Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Irish Life Assurance plc / First National Building Society [1999] IECA 548 (16th April, 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1999/548.html
Cite as:
[1999] IECA 548
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Irish Life Assurance plc / First National Building Society [1999] IECA 548 (16th April, 1999)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 16 April 1999 relating to a proceeding under Section 4 of
the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No. CA/1045/92E - Irish Life Assurance plc/First National Building Society.
Decision
No. 548
Price £0.80
£1.30
incl. postage
Notification
No. CA/1045/92E - Irish Life Assurance plc/First National Building Society.
Decision
No. 548
Introduction.
1 Notification
was made by Irish Life Assurance plc on 30 September 1992 with a request for a
Certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, 1991 or, in the event of
a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2), in respect of a Tied Agency Agreement between Irish Life
Assurance plc and First National Building Society (FNBS).
The
Facts
(a)
Subject of the Notification
2 The
notification concerns a Tied Insurance Agency Agreement whereby the Insurer
(Irish Life) appoints FNBS as a tied insurance agent.
(b)
The Parties Involved
3 The
notifying party, Irish Life Assurance plc, has its registered offices at Lower
Abbey Street, Dublin 1. The company transacts all forms of individual life
assurance, group pension schemes, pensions for the self employed, annuities and
investment savings. Irish Life’s total assets in 1997 were £6.4bn
and its gross premium income was £520m.
4 The
First National Building Society has its registered offices at Skehan House,
Booterstown, Dublin. The society’s core business is the advancement of
loans for mortgages. FNBS and its subsidiaries are also involved in a number
of personal financial service areas. Its total assets under management in 1997
amounted to £4,885m. Loans and advances to customers were £2,593m in
the same period. In September of this year FNBS changed its status from a
building society to a public limited company named First Active plc.
(c)
The Product and the Market
5 The
markets affected by this agreement are (i) that for the sale of life assurance
products in Ireland and (ii) that for the services of insurance intermediaries
for life assurance. The insurance products covered by the Agreement are: whole
life and endowment assurances; s.60 and s.119 life assurances; serious illness
cover; personal pensions for self employed persons; employers pension schemes
for employees; group and individual permanent health schemes; single premium
life assurance and investment contracts; Additional Voluntary Contribution
contracts. These may constitute one product market or several separate product
markets. The Authority considers that it is not necessary to determine which
products form separate markets since the Agreement applies to all the products.
6 In
Ireland, there are approximately 31 companies providing life assurance and
pension products. Life products are sold/distributed in four ways:-
- directly
by the insurer’s office to the consumer;
- through
tied agents who are contractually committed to selling the life products of one
particular office;
- through
agents, who sell the life products of more than one company;
- through
brokers, who sell the life products of five or more companies.
7 Insurance
products are complex in nature. Most customers are not able to evaluate
products accurately at the time of buying, since only after some years have
passed does it become possible to know whether the investment was good or poor.
Customers typically cannot make buying decisions as between insurance products
without either significant search costs or specialist advice.
8 In
its Decision No. 495,
[1]
the
Authority found that the total premium income received by all life offices
selling life products was IR£1,622bn and total claims were £1.3 bn in
1995. Moreover, in that decision the Authority also found that most life
products are sold through agent or broker intermediaries; approximately 53% for
new Annual Premium business and 59% for new Single Premium business (1995
data), 23% of Annual Premiums and 28% of Single Premiums of new business was
sold through employees and 21% Annual Premiums and 8% Single Premiums were sold
through tied agents. The remaining 3% Annual Premiums and 5% Single Premiums
were sold through over the counter sales or some through telephone sales.
9 The
terms broker, agent and tied agent are defined in the Insurance Act 1989.
"Intermediaries" as used in the Agreement is an umbrella term for brokers,
agents and tied agents. The service provided by an insurance intermediary is a
combination of services to the insurance company and to the retail customer.
They are not clearly, or exclusively, or continuously the agent of either the
insurer or the customer. To the retail customer, brokers and agents offer a
service of information about a number of insurance products, which a customer
would otherwise have to collate from different insurance companies. These
intermediaries may also offer the customer the service of advice as between the
different products. Tied agents and company employees can offer only the
service of explaining one or more products of a single insurance company.
Intermediaries are not paid directly by the customer for their services but by
the insurer whose product they ultimately sell. To the insurer, the
intermediary is selling the service of promoting and distributing its product.
10 Irish
Life have indicated that there are several companies competing in the Irish
market for the products in question. In terms of ‘investment type’
products, life offices compete with retail banks, building societies and An
Post. According to the notifying party the market for the distribution of life
products is highly competitive with direct sales forces competing with
insurance intermediaries and other independent financial advisors such as
accountants or solicitors. There are few limits on entry to the market for
life insurance intermediary services. Recent entry into the market by Ark Life
and Equitable Life demonstrates that barriers to entry into this market have
not been prohibitive.
11 Irish
Life submits
that
its sales figures in respect of the products/services affected by this
agreement for 1993 was £61.7m. It estimated that First National’s
turnover in Irish Life’s products for 1994 was [ ] and that this
represented [ ] of the total market for all companies in these services in
Ireland. It further submitted that its market share of the life assurance and
pensions business has declined in the 1990s. Its market share in the relevant
products/services in Ireland has declined from [ ] in 1991 to [ ] in
1994.
(d)
The Notified Arrangements
12 This
notification concerns a draft Tied Agency Agreement whereby the FNBS has agreed
to market and sell the insurer’s contracts to the public and to service
customers of such contracts. FNBS has acted as the “tied insurance
agent” (as defined in the Insurance act 1989) of Irish Life Assurance plc
since 1, April 1991.
The
agreement is of an indefinite duration.
13 FNBS
is empowered to act as a tied agent for the sole purpose of a) procuring and
endeavouring to procure the completion of proposals to the insurer in respect
of the insurer’s products by persons with whom the society deals and b)
advising persons with whom the society deals about the insurance products,
about the sale of such products and about the exercise of rights conferred or
derived from such products.
14 The
provisions of the agreement relate for the most part to obliging the Tied
Insurance Agent to comply with the requirements imposed on Tied Insurance
Agents under the
Insurance Act 1989. Other provisions in the agreement relate
to maintaining the image and integrity of Irish Life products and the
responsibility of Irish Life for acts or omissions of a Tied Insurance Agent.
15 Under
the agreement the society must act according to the law in carrying out its
functions; bring to the attention of the insurer any breach of the act, the
code of conduct for intermediaries or this agreement; not engage any employee
in the marketing or sale of the insurer’s products who would be
unacceptable to the insurer; ensure that all employees are subject to proper
training and supervision; pay promptly all sums due to the insurer by the
society or any client of the society; indemnify the insurer and maintain
adequate insurance to cover all liability.
16 Under
Clause 5.18 FNBS agrees “not to enter into a tied agency agreement or
arrangement as defined in
S.51(3) of the
Insurance Act, with anyone or any
entity other than the Insurer.”
17 Clause
6 of the notified agreement relates to commission. It provides that the
commission is “subject always to the maximum levels of commission
allowable under the current version of the Insurance Industry
Federation’s agreement on maximum rates of remuneration for life
business.”
18 The
insurer may terminate the agreement if the society breaches any provision of
the agreement, Act, or code of conduct, or is adjudged insolvent. Each party
may terminate the agreement by giving 6 months’ written notice. On
termination of the agreement the society agrees to no longer represent itself
as a tied agent or intermediary of the insurer, returning all property and
stationery of the insurer. The tied agent may not transfer any of its rights
under the agreement without the prior consent of the insurer.
19 On
termination of the agreement the society also undertakes for a period of one
year,
“not
to procure directly or indirectly any policy holder of the insurer in respect
of which the Society was originally, or at any time, the selling agent, to
relinquish, cancel, surrender, discontinue or otherwise dispose of any contract
or other business with the insurer or to in any way directly or indirectly
approach or solicit any policy holder for such purpose.”
(e)
Submission of the Parties
20 Irish
Life submits that the agreement has neither the object nor the effect of
preventing, restricting or distorting competition in the State. It submits
that no clause of the draft agreement enforces absolute territorial protection.
Furthermore, there is no restriction on intra-brand competition as the services
in question are available from more than one source (brokers, agents, direct
sales forces).
21 Irish
Life submits that the arrangements contribute to improving the provision of
services by extending the availability of Irish Life products to customers of
FNBS. Customers of the FNBS are also customers of retail banks operating in the
market for life assurance. Irish Life believes that the effect of the
agreement is to increase competition and choice for the consumer.
22 Finally,
Irish Life submits that the arrangement does not afford the undertakings the
possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the
services in question. The only restriction on FNBS is to act as a tied agent
which they believe is necessary to ensure the improvement in distribution.
There is no agreement amounting to absolute territorial protection. The
exclusivity of the agreement does not afford Irish Life the opportunity of
preventing other life companies from entering or expanding in the relevant
market.
(f)
Subsequent Developments
23 On
10 December 1998, the Authority issued a Statement of Objections to the
notifying party indicating its intention to refuse to issue a certificate or
grant a licence to the notified arrangements because these arrangements
required that the parties adhere to the Insurance Industry Federation agreement
on maximum rates of remuneration for life business. By letter dated 14
January, the notifying party stated that it no longer adhered to the IIF
agreement and it was fully aware of its obligation not to do so. Accordingly,
on 16 February 1999, Irish Life Assurance plc. issued a letter to First Active
plc. (formally First National Building Society) stating that “ on 5
February 1998, Decision No. 495 of the Competition Authority found the Irish
Insurance Federation’s Agreement on Maximum Rates of Remuneration for
Life Business (the IIF Agreement) to be anti-competitive and in contravention
with
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991 and that it did not satisfy the
conditions of
Section 4(2). In the interests of ensuring that both of our
organisations can demonstrate compliance with the Authority’s ruling, we
confirm that Irish Life will not enforce any provisions relating to the maximum
levels of commission payable under IIF Commissions Agreement and waives any
rights relating to such provisions”.
The
Assessment
(a)
Section 4(1)
24
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991, as amended, states that “all
agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and
concerted practices, which have as their object or effect the prevention,
restriction or distortion of competition in goods or services in the State or
in any part of the State are prohibited and void.”
(b)
The Undertakings and the Agreement.
25
Section
3(1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as “a person being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service.”
26 The
parties to the agreement are Irish Life Assurance plc and FNBS. Irish Life
Assurance plc is involved in the transaction of life assurance and pension
business in Ireland and the provision of investment management services. It is
also involved in other areas of personal financial services. Irish Life
,
therefore, is an undertaking within the meaning of Section 3(1) of the
Competition Act. FNBS is also an undertaking engaged in the provision of a
service associated with the same goods, i.e. the distribution of life and
pension products in the State. The Agreement is an agreement between
undertakings having effect within the State.
(c)
The Applicability of Section 4(1)
27 The
agreement creates an agent-principal relationship between FNBS and Irish Life
plc. The Authority considers that FNBS is an intermediary between Irish Life
and the purchasers of life assurance and pension schemes. It concludes the
sale of products on behalf of Irish Life. The Authority considers that FNBS is
an auxiliary organ forming an integral part of Irish Life’s distribution
business, and it concludes that FNBS can be considered to be a commercial agent
of Irish Life.
28 The
Authority has stated in the Conoco consignee agreement
[2]
that the relationship of principal and agent does not in itself contravene
section 4(1), and that certain restrictions which are necessary to that
relationship also do not offend. The arrangement is such that FNBS as a tied
agent for Irish Life must “refer all proposals of insurance to the
undertaking with whom he has made or entered in to the agreement or
arrangement.” As such, FNBS is prevented from selling the products of
other life offices. The Authority takes the view that the
“exclusivity” of the agreement does not prevent other life offices
from distributing their life and pension products through other intermediaries
(agents, brokers and tied agents) or their direct sales forces. Moreover,
there is nothing in the agreement that prevents FNBS from entering the market
directly or becoming the tied insurance agent of another insurer. FNBS may
switch to another life office with 6 months notice. The Authority considers,
therefore, that the agreement between Irish Life and FNBS, insofar as it
creates an exclusive agency relationship between the principal and the
commercial agent, does not contravene
Section 4(1).
29 Even
though the basic arrangement of commercial agency may not contravene
Section
4(1), certain clauses in the agreement might occasionally do so. Clause 8.3 of
the agreement precludes FNBS from procuring any policy holder of the insurer in
respect of which the Society was the selling agent for a period of one year
after the termination of the agreement. During the term of the agreement the
special relationship of the agent and principal means that the agent is wholly
integrated into the distribution system of the principal and is privy to the
principal’s affairs, with contacts with the principal’s customers
which could enable him to compete unfairly with his principal or the agent who
succeeds him. The EU Directive on Commercial Agents provides for a maximum
post term non-compete clause of 2 years from termination. As the provisions of
this clause are restricted to clients of which FNBS is agent and for a period
of one year only, the Authority considers that this clause does not contravene
Section 4(1).
30 Clause
6 provides that commission shall be “subject always to the maximum levels
of commission allowable under the current applicable version of the Insurance
Industry Federation’s Agreement on maximum rates of remuneration for life
business” (“the IIF Agreement”).
31 In
its Decision 495
[3],
the
Authority refused to issue a certificate or grant a licence to the IIF
Agreement. It concluded that that Agreement had both the object and the effect
of preventing, restricting or distorting competition between insurers in the
market for life insurance products in the State, and that it did not meet the
requirements for a licence. In that decision, the Authority established that
virtually all distribution of life products in the State is through
intermediaries and a fixed charge for this form of distribution is paid by
virtually all customers. The charge is not disclosed and is not related to the
actual cost of distribution to the individual customer. In that decision the
Authority stated its view that it is restrictive of competition to fix the
maximum commission payable to intermediaries. It does not provide an insurance
company with the incentive to compete for customers’ business by reducing
the level of commission payable by the customer, as intermediaries are more
likely to sell the products of those companies offering higher commission.
Moreover, fixing maximum rates of commission facilitates the sharing by
competitors of information about an element of their costs. It removes some of
the uncertainty as to competitors’ prices which is a important component
of price competition.
[4] 32
The
Authority also considered that the maximum rates of commission may be treated
by insurers as a minima which may have the effect that all insurers will pay
the same level of commission, thereby eliminating competition between them as
regards an element of their costs. Furthermore, the Authority believed that
fixing a maximum commission has the effect of removing any incentive for
competition between brokers, agents and tied agents on price and quality of
service.
33 The
agreement under consideration here is a vertical agreement between Irish Life
and its tied insurance agent, FNBS. Insofar as its vertical aspects are
concerned, the Authority considers that the agreement does not contravene
Section 4(1). However, Clause 6 of the agreement requires the parties to adhere
to the IIF Agreement, a horizontal industry-wide agreement which the Authority
has already found to be in breach of Section 4(1). The Authority considered
that this requirement contravened Section 4(1).
On
16 February 1999, Irish Life confirmed to First Active that it had waived all
rights to and would not enforce any provisions of its agreement with First
Active (formally First National Building Society), which related to the IIF
Commission’s agreement. It has sent a copy of this letter to the
Authority. In the opinion of the Authority, therefore, the agreement between
Irish Life and its tied insurance agent, FNBS, does not prevent, restrict or
distort competition within the meaning of Section 4(1) of the Competition Act,
1991.
(d)
The Decision
34 The
Competition Authority considers that Irish Life Assurance plc and FNBS are
undertakings and that the Tied Agency Agreement is an agreement between
undertakings. In the opinion of the Authority, the agreement as amended by
letter of waiver dated 16 February 1999 does not contravene
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991, as amended.
The
Certificate
1. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate :
2. The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the Tied Insurance Agency Agreement between Irish Life
Assurance plc. and First National Building Society (Notification No.
CA/1045/92E), notified on 30 September 1992, and amended by letter of waiver
dated 16 February 1999, does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition
Act, 1991, as amended.
For
the Competition Authority
Isolde
Goggin
Member
April
1999
[1]
For a comprehensive overview of the life assurance market, see Competition
Authority Decision No 495 of 8 February 1998 (Irish Insurance Federation
agreement on maximum rates of remuneration for life business)
[2]
Decision No. 286 of 25 February 1994
[4]
The views of the Authority on price fixing and the recommendation of prices by
a trade association are set out in detail in Decision No. 335. The Irish Stock
Exchange Rules on Government Gilts.
© 1999 Irish Competition Authority