Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
E.R. Squibb & Clonmel Healthcare [1999] IECA 540 (24th March, 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1999/540.html
Cite as:
[1999] IECA 540
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
E.R. Squibb & Clonmel Healthcare [1999] IECA 540 (24th March, 1999)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 24 March 1999 relating to a proceeding under
Section
4 of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No. CA/25/96: E.R. Squibb & Clonmel Healthcare Ltd
Decision
No. 540
Price
£0.60
£1.00
incl. postage
Competition
Authority Decision of 24 March 1999 relating to a proceeding under
Section
4 of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No. CA/25/96: E.R. Squibb & Clonmel Healthcare Ltd
Decision
No. 540
Introduction
1.
Notification was made by E.R. Squibb & Clonmel Healthcare Ltd on 15 August
1996 with a request for a certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act
1991 or, in the event of a refusal by the Competition Authority to grant a
certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2) in respect of an exclusive licensing
agreement.
The
Facts
(a)
Subject of the Notification
2.
The notification concerns an agreement dated 14th June, 1996, together with two
related side letters, one dated 14th June, 1996 and the other dated 5th July,
1996 pursuant to which Clonmel Healthcare Limited is granted by E.R. Squibb
& Sons Inc. a licence under Squibb's Irish patent no. 44707 permitting
Clonmel to import the substance Captopril and to convert same into a finished
pharmaceutical product for human use and to market and sell the finished
pharmaceutical product in Ireland from the date of the licence through to the
expiry of the patent in accordance with its terms in February, 1997. The
licence is exclusive, save as to the existing rights granted in favour of
Squibb's Irish affiliate, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Limited of
Swords, County Dublin.
(b)
The Notifying Party Involved
3.
E.R. Squibb & Sons Inc. have a registered address at P.O. Box 400,
Princeton, N.J.
085405
U.S.A.
They are incorporated under laws of the State of Delaware in the U.S.A. and are
a subsidiary Company of Bristol Myers Squibb Company of 345, Park Avenue, New
York, N.Y. 10154. The latter are also incorporated under the laws of the State
of Delaware. Bristol-Myers Squibb is a diversified world-wide health and
personal care company whose principal business is pharmaceuticals, consumer
products, nutritionals and medical devices. E.R. Squibb & Sons Inc. does
not itself market or have sales of Captopril in Ireland. All such sales are
effected through a subsidiary company of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
established within the State, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Limited,
which is responsible for the marketing and sale of all Bristol-Myers Squibb
pharmaceutical products in Ireland. Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals
Limited is established at Watery Lane, Swords, Co. Dublin.
4.
Clonmel Healthcare Limited is an Irish company with registered office at
Waterford Road, Clonmel, Co. Tipperary. It is engaged in the manufacture and
distribution of pharmaceuticals for Irish and export markets. The company is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of The Cross Group, a private Irish owned holding
company.
(c)
The Products & Markets
5.
The Notifying Parties claimed that the licence granted relates to the
importation and subsequent manufacture into finished pharmaceutical form of the
product generally known as Captopril. Captopril is an anti-hypertensive agent
and was the first of a group of agents known as ace-inhibitors (angiotension
converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors). Captopril is used in the treatment of
hypertension and the treatment of post myocardial infarction. It is used
separately in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy and congestive heart
failure. The Notifying Party claimed that whilst Captopril was the first
ACE-inhibitor on the market, it is now one of 13 ace-inhibitors on the market.
Other ace-inhibitors include Innovace, Zestril Tritace, Coversyl, Accupro.
6.
The Notifying Party further claimed that in addition to other ACE-inhibitors,
Captopril also competes against 150 other products in the cardiovascular
preparations market in its indicated therapeutic areas.
7.
The Authority is of the view that the relevant market for the purposes of this
notification is the cardiovascular preparations products market (inclusive of
ACE - Inhibitors). The market share, by value, achieved by the product
Captopril in the relevant market, is approximately [ ].
(d)
Structure of the Market
8.
The total pharmaceutical turnover in Ireland is approximately [ ] of which the
proportion spent on relevant cardiovascular preparations is approximately [ ]
million. Of the total turnover of Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Limited,
approximately [ ] is attributable to sales of products in the relevant
cardiovascular preparations market. The Notifying party claimed that
Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Limited has an estimated market share of
approximately [ ] in the Irish Pharmaceutical market. In the field of the
relevant market, Captopril has a market share of approximately [ ] by value and
approx [ ] measured by prescription sales. Clonmel Healthcare Limited, which
has not marketed Captopril based products before the agreement, has a [ ]
share, by value, of the Irish pharmaceutical market.
9.
Clonmel Healthcare currently has three products in the cardiovascular
therapeutic category. Annual sales of these products amount to [ ] of the
value of this market segment (cardiovascular products).
(e)
The Notified Arrangement
10.
The Notification concerns an exclusive licence agreement between the Notifying
Parties pursuant to which Squibb grants to Clonmel licence under its Irish
patent No. 44707 covering proline derivatives, including the substance commonly
known as Captopril, pursuant to which Clonmel, under Clause 1, is permitted to
import the substance and to convert the same into a finished pharmaceutical
product for human use and for the marketing and sale thereof in Ireland from
the date of licence through to the expiry of the patent in accordance with its
terms in February, 1997.
11.
In consideration of the rights granted under Clause 1, an agreed lump sum,
under Clause 2, is due from Clonmel to Squibb but payable over a term expiring
on the 31st December, 2000 and subject to adjustment in the event that Clonmel
sales of the product exceed certain agreed levels over the period in question.
The rights granted by Squibb are valid for a period of 8 months only, upon the
expiration of which such period any and all Notifying Party authorised or
permitted to sell pharmaceutical products in the State will be free to
introduce generic products equivalent to the product licensed to Clonmel.
12.
No restrictions are contained in the Clauses of the agreement as to the right
of the Notifying Party to take independent commercial decisions save that it is
expressly indicated that Clonmel is not, by virtue of the Agreement, entitled
to import the substance from any country in which a patent or similar right
corresponding to the patent under which the licence is granted in the State
shall be in force in which the manufacture or supply of the substance would
infringe a valid patent or other intellectual property right of Squibb.
Further, Clonmel has no right to confer any rights under the licence on third
parties.
(f)
Submissions by the Notifying Parties
13.
The Notifying Party claimed that they did not believe that the agreement, or
any aspects of the agreement, restricted the Notifying Party in their
commercial freedom to take independent commercial decisions.
14.
In reply to the Authority’s query on the expiry of the licence, by virtue
of the Patent Expiry Date, Clauses 8(a) and 9, the Notifying Party, in a letter
dated 4 March 1999, stated that for the purposes of Clause 8(b), “the
agreement is still in existence and will continue in full force and effect
until December 31 2000, in the context of continued payments of all monies due
to E.R. Squibb & Sons Inc pursuant to the agreement”.
Arguments
in Support of the Grant of a Certificate
15.
The Notifying Party claim that the agreement and its provisions do not have as
their object or affect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition
in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State
within the meaning of
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act.
16.
The Notifying Party claim that the granting of a licence by E.R. Squibb is
procompetitive as this permits an early entry into the market in advance of
patent expiry, resulting in a direct competitor against Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceuticals Limited within the lifetime of the patent and an additional
competitor against other ACE-inhibitors and those other products already
competing in the cardiovascular preparations market.
Arguments
in Support of the Grant of a Licence
17.
The Notifying Party submitted arguments in support of the granting of a
Licence. However, the Authority is of the opinion that the grant of a Licence
does not apply in this particular instance.
(g)
Submissions by Third Parties
18.
There were no submissions by third parties.
(h)
Assessment
(a)
Applicability of Section 4(1)
19.
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act states that “all agreements between
undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted
practices, which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or
distortion of competition in goods or services in the State or in any part of
the State are prohibited and void”.
(b)
The Undertakings and the Agreement
20.
Section 3(1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as ‘a person,
being an individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service’. E.R.Squibb & Clonmel Healthcare Ltd are corporate bodies
engaged for gain in the manufacture and distribution of cardiovascular
preparations products. They are therefore undertakings and the agreement is an
agreement between undertakings. The agreement has effect within the State
(c)
The Exclusive Agreement
21.
It is the view of the Authority that the Clauses in the exclusive licensing
agreement do not restrict competition. The agreement is an exclusive licence
agreement whereby E.R. Squibb & Sons Inc. permits Clonmel to import the
substance Captopril and to convert same into a finished pharmaceutical product
and to market and sell the finished product in the State. Clonmel Healthcare
Ltd is not precluded from selling any other products in the Territory and is
free to introduce generic products equivalent to the product licensed on expiry
of the patent. Inter-brand competition is not restricted and with many other
producers in the market, the level of competition is not diluted.
22.
Licensing in this case, for example, where market shares are relatively small
and where there is effective competition, simply allows E.R. Squibb & Sons
Inc to transfer their know-how to Clonmel Healthcare Ltd and although the
agreement contains clauses that allow a transfer of goodwill, no aspects of the
agreement restrict the Notifying Party in their freedom to take independent
commercial decisions.
23.
The Authority is of the view that the cardiovascular preparations products
market (inclusive of ACE - Inhibitors) in the State is characterised by a
large number of competing products. The Authority opines that rather than
eliminating competition, the agreement introduces an element of competition to
the market which would not otherwise arise in advance of patent expiry in 1997.
The Authority is therefore of the view that the agreement does not prevent,
restrict or distort competition.
24.
Therefore the Authority is of the opinion that the Agreement does not
constitute restrictions on competition within the meaning of
section 4(1) of
the Act.
The
Decision
25.
In the Authority’s opinion E.R. Squibb & Sons Inc & Clonmel
Healthcare Ltd are undertakings within the meaning of
section 3(1) of the
Competition Act and the notified arrangement constitutes an agreement between
undertakings. In the Authority’s opinion the exclusive licensing
agreement dated 14th June, 1996 does not contravene
section 4(1) of the
Competition Act.
The
Certificate
The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that, in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the exclusive licence agreement dated 14th June, 1996
between ER Squibb & Sons Inc. and Clonmel Healthcare Limited notified under
section 7 of the
Competition Act on 15 August 1996 (Notification No. CA/25/96)
does not contravene
section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991, as amended.
For
the Competition Authority
Professor
Patrick McNutt
Chairperson
24
March 1999
© 1999 Irish Competition Authority