Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
The Direct Debiting Committee [1995] IECA 442 (23rd November, 1995)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1995/442.html
Cite as:
[1995] IECA 442
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
The Direct Debiting Committee [1995] IECA 442 (23rd November, 1995)
Competition
Authority decision of 23 November , 1995 relating to a proceeding under Section
4 of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No. CA/125/92E - The Direct Debiting Committee.
Decision
No. 442.
Introduction
1. The
Direct Debiting Committee (DDC) Rules and Originators Guide for the Direct
Debiting Scheme were notified to the Competition Authority on 25 September,
1992. The Rules regulate arrangements for the operation of the direct debiting
system. Since the original notification was received the rules have been
updated with a fourth edition of the rules being issued in 1994. At the time
of the notification the DDC consisted of the four associated banks and the
Central Bank of Ireland. TSB Bank has since joined. The notification
requested a certificate under Section 4(4), or in the event of a refusal by the
Authority to grant a certificate, a licence under Section 4 (2). Notice of
intention to take a favourable decision was published on 13 October, 1995 and
no submissions were received. The Minister for Finance was invited to make a
submission pursuant to Section 4 (5).
The
Facts
(a)
The Subject of the Notification
2. The
notification concerns the DDC Rules and Originators Guide for the Direct
Debiting Scheme. The parties to the agreement, with the exception of the
Central Bank, each provide banking services to the general public. The Rules
are agreed between the parties.
(b)
The Parties
3. The
parties to the arrangements are Allied Irish Banks plc, The Governor and
Company of the Bank of Ireland, National Irish Bank Ltd., Ulster Bank Ltd. and
the Central Bank of Ireland. Each of these is a member of the DDC which is an
unincorporated association. TSB Bank became a member of the DDC after the
arrangements were notified. The first four are known as the associated banks.
They are essentially clearing banks which provide a broad range of retail and
wholesale banking services and were traditionally responsible for the money
transmission system. AIB and the Bank of Ireland are Irish registered
institutions. Ulster Bank is a subsidiary of the UK National Westminster Bank
group and National Irish Bank is a subsidiary of the National Australia Bank
group. The Ulster Bank and National Irish Bank are much smaller in terms of
size than Bank of Ireland and AIB. TSB bank emerged as a result of a series of
amalgamations of the various trustee savings banks which had been located
throughout the State. The Central Bank of Ireland was established by the
Central Bank Act 1942. Its function is to operate as a central bank, i.e. to
regulate commercial banks and other financial institutions, to provide banking
services to the Government and to operate monetary and exchange rate policy.
(c)
The Product and the Market
4.
The arrangements involve the rules of the DDC for the operation of the Direct
Debiting System. Direct debits are a mechanism for payment of regular, and
principally variable, payments. They constitute the only means recognised by
the banks involved whereby a payer may authorise payment, until further notice,
from his bank account, of sums which are variable as to time and/or amount at
the discretion of the payee. The scheme was first introduced to Ireland in
1967. It is designed for use by persons (known as originators) such as
insurance companies, public utilities, hire purchase and instalment finance
companies, building societies and manufacturers who generate large volumes of
periodic payments from their clients. The scheme is designed to provide an
efficient system of collecting such payments. An originator is able to collect
amounts due from a payer by originating direct debits upon an account of the
payer. The payer provides prior authorization for the collection of such
payments and can nominate an account with any financial institution within the
State to whom a national sorting code number has been allocated for payments
clearing purposes. The institution need not be a member of the DDC. An
originator must be sponsored by one of the DDC member banks. Customers of
other banks can become originators by means of an arrangement between the
account holding bank and a DDC member bank.
5. Direct
debits provide one means of making payment transfers. Cash, cheques, and in
the case of personal customers, standing orders, credit cards and ATM cards can
also be used for such payments. From the point of view of the originator
direct debits ensure prompt payment of bills. Payers are provided with a
simple, safe and convenient service for the payment of bills as they fall due.
Direct debits eliminate the need to write out and post cheques, to queue at
cash offices or banks and eliminate the risk of overlooking payment dates.
Some data on the size of the market is given below. Cheques are by the most
common cashless payment medium. In 1993 total cheque payments amounted to
£323bn with credit transfer payments amounting to £290bn. In
contrast total direct debit payments amounted to £34bn.
Table
1: Details of Payment Transactions (1994)
|
Number
|
Value
|
Cheques
|
164m
(1993)
|
£323bn
(1993)
|
Direct
Debits
|
31m
|
£34bn
|
Credit
Transfers
|
71m
|
£290bn
|
ATM
Transactions
|
74m
|
£3.2bn
|
Credit
Card Transactions
|
29m
|
£1.2bn
|
Source:
Irish Bankers Federation.
(d)
The Arrangements
7. The
Terms, Conditions and Criteria for membership of the Direct Debit scheme as a
sponsoring institution provide that all credit institutions which are
supervised by the Central Bank and are authorised to provide money transmission
services may become sponsoring banks provided they satisfy certain criteria.
These provide that:
(i)
the institution must be a member of the Dublin Banks Clearing Committee;
[1] (ii)
the institution must abide by the DDC rules;
(iii)
the institution must do its utmost to keep direct debit by paper to a minimum;
(iv)
the institution must provide magnetic media in a format compatible with all
banks' computer systems.
Institutions
are required to pay an equitable share of the annual operating costs. New
entrants are required to pay an entry cost equivalent to 5% of the past
development costs of the scheme.
8. The
arrangements involve the DDC rules in respect of the direct debiting system.
The original notification involved the third edition of the rules which had
been in force since 1988. The rules were revised and a fourth edition was
issued in 1994 but this involved only very minor changes. They include
provisions for the admission of originators. These provide
inter
alia
that
as a condition of participation a prospective originator must execute a form of
Direct Debiting Indemnity. Under this the originator undertakes to indemnify
the banks against any loss arising from his direct debiting operations. It is
a principle of the scheme that a payer has the right to seek and obtain an
immediate refund from his bank branch when a direct debit has been charged to
his account in error or where a payment is in dispute. If the originator was
at fault, the bank branch will send a direct debiting indemnity claim to the
originator.
9. The
rules require that the prospective originator be a customer of a bank in
Ireland. Sponsoring banks are the members of the DDC. The rules also specify
the format to be followed in the direct debiting instruction. Provisions are
also included
inter
alia
regulating
the provisions of advance notice to payers (in the case of variable amount
instructions only), amendments to the payer's instructions, amalgamation of
payments and input requirements and procedures.
(e)
Submissions of the Parties
10. In
support of its request for a certificate the DDC stated that its objective was
to allow sponsoring institutions to co-operate to provide a payments system
which was highly secure, efficient and reliable. They stated that detailed
rules were essential to protect the integrity of the scheme and reduce risks.
The DDC stated that although the scheme involved co-operation between banks,
this did not impact upon competition on how direct debiting services were
provided by individual banks. It was also stated that no applicant for
sponsoring membership had been declined. The DDC also presented a number of
arguments in support of their request for a licence but these are not
considered here.
(f)
Other information.
11. On
15 October 1984 the Irish Banks Standing Committee notified the DDC rules to
the EU Commission.
[2]
The Commission found that the notified arrangements did not infringe Article
85(1) of the Treaty of Rome and granted a negative clearance.
(g)
Subsequent developments
12. The
Authority, pursuant to
Section 4 (5) of the
Competition Act, 1991, invited the
Minister for Finance to offer observations on the notified arrangements. The
Minister welcomed the notification of the Committee's rules as improving the
transparency of the money transmission system and providing an opportunity to
establish the competitiveness of the system. The Minister was concerned that
the DDC should seek to be as open and accessible as possible to institutions
that might wish to participate in money transmission services. With regard to
the rules of operation of the DDC, he expressed the view that the thresholds
applied for membership, the costs of membership and other provisions should not
be prohibitive for institutions wishing to participate.
Assessment
(a)
Section 4(1)
13.
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act states that ´all agreements between
undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices
which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion
of competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of
the State are prohibited and void.'
(b)
The Undertakings and the Agreement
14.
Section
3(1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as ´a person being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service.' The parties to the present arrangement are the four associated
banks, TSB Bank and the Central Bank. All of them are corporate bodies engaged
in the provision of banking services for gain and are therefore undertakings
within the meaning of
the Act. The DDC is therefore an association of
undertakings. The Direct Debiting Rules of the DDC constitute an agreement
between undertakings. They also constitute a decision by an association of
undertakings.
(c)
Applicability of Section 4(1)
15. The
arrangements between the various banking institutions regarding the direct
debiting system are not anti-competitive per se. It is open to any licensed
financial institution to become a sponsoring bank and thence to provide direct
debiting services. The rules simply deal with practical matters such as the
format of direct debit mandates. The rules do not affect competition between
financial institutions in their provision of direct debiting services to
customers. The DDC Rules, as notified do not include any provisions which
prevent, restrict or distort competition.
The
Decision
16. In
the Authority's opinion the associated banks, TSB Bank and the Central Bank of
Ireland are undertakings within the meaning of
Section 3(1) of the
Competition
Act, and the DDC rules constitute an agreement between undertakings. The rules
also constitute a decision by an association of undertakings.
In
the Authority's opinion the Direct Debiting Committee Rules and Originators'
Guide of the Direct Debiting Scheme, (CA/125/92E), notified on 25 September
1992 under
Section 7, as amended by the Fourth Edition 1994, do not offend
against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act.
The
Certificate
17. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that, in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the Direct Debiting Committee Rules and Originators' Guide
of the Direct Debiting Scheme, (CA/125/92E), notified on 25 September 1992
under
Section 7, as amended by the Fourth Edition 1994, do not offend against
section 4(1) of the
Competition Act.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
Massey
Member
23
November, 1995.
[ ] 1
The DBCC rules are the subject of a separate Authority notification.
[ ]2
Commission Decision of 30 September 1986, OJ L295/28, 18.10.86.
© 1995 Irish Competition Authority