Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
An Post/Postmasters [1995] IECA 400 (27th April, 1995)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1995/400.html
Cite as:
[1995] IECA 400
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
An Post/Postmasters [1995] IECA 400 (27th April, 1995)
Competition
Authority Decision of 27 April 1995 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No. CA/837/92E - An Post / Postmasters.
Decision
No. 400
Introduction
1.
Notification was made by An Post on 30 September, 1992 with a request for a
certificate under
Section 4(4)of the
Competition Act, 1991 or, in the event of
a refusal by the Competition Authority to grant a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2) in respect of a standard agency agreement between An Post and the
Postmasters.
The
Facts
(a)
The Subject of the Notification
2.
The notification concerns a standard agency agreement between An Post as the
Principal and the Postmasters as agents of An Post to provide a "counter
business" - the retail activities carried on in a post office - in sub-post
offices on behalf of the company.
(b)
The parties involved
3.
An Post is the state owned company engaged in the operation of the national
postal service. The company also operates money transmission services and
provides agency services for Government Departments, An Post National Lottery
Company, Telecom Eireann and other bodies. The company's turnover in 1993 was
£271.8m on which a profit of £7.1m ws made. The Postmasters of whom
there were 1,914 in September, 1992 operate the sub-post offices on behalf of
An Post.
(c)
The service and the market
4.
The service concerned in this notification is the provision of Counter
Services, that is the service activities carried on in post offices, by
Postmasters in sub-post offices to the public on behalf of An Post.
Counter
services include receipt, registration and dispatch of letter and parcel mails
and express delivery mails; sale of postage and saving stamps; sale of TV and
dog licences; government publications; postal and money orders; saving
certificates and prize bonds; operation of a savings bank service; and Social
Welfare, Telecom Eireann and other agency businesses. The business is made up
of the statutory monopoly activities of An Post, together with services which
An Post operates on behalf of other bodies such as NTMA, Government Departments
and Telecom Eireann.
5.
There were 2009 post offices on 1 September, 1992, and of these 95 were
owned by An Post and managed by its employees and the remaining 1,914 sub-post
offices were operated on a sub-contract basis by self employed Postmasters.
Over £3 billon worth of transactions are carried out annually at over
2,000 post offices throughout the State. Many Sub Postmasters are also engaged
in other retail activities as, for example, newsagents.
(d)
The agreement
6.
The notified agreement is a standard agreement, which incorporates a Book of
Rules, between An Post and the Postmasters and is of unlimited duration.
The
sub postmaster is appointed to a sub post office to provide services on behalf
of An Post, for which s/he is paid by way of commission calculated on the
volume of business transacted. The sub postmaster provides the premises from
which the business is conducted. Appointment to the position of postmaster is
by competition, but the appointee does not become an employee of An Post.
7.
Under rule 2.12 Postmasters are restricted from being the proprietor of a
newspaper, either wholly or jointly, or from taking part in the editing,
printing or management of a newspaper. The Postmaster is allowed to hold an
agency for the sale or delivery of newspapers, but not to engage an employee to
deliver a newspaper which is usually not posted, at the same time as a postal
delivery.
8.
Under rule 2.13 the Postmaster is restricted from holding certain
occupations, either as principal or agent, while employed by An Post as the
Postmaster of a Sub-Post Office. These include banking or money lending
business, or a business connected with a building, provident or friendly
society which involves the receipt of money on deposit. Any business connected
with a parcel delivery company, or with carriers of parcels is also forbidden.
The business of an agency for the collection and distribution of news, the
management, printing or publishing of a newspaper or as a correspondent for a
newspaper is also prohibited. Philately and bookmaking activities are also
restricted. Postmasters are restricted from carrying on on their own account
any activity which An Post might in the future require the Postmaster to
perform on behalf of the company. Postmasters and part time officers are
permitted to engage in the Life Insurance business under certain conditions,
i.e. Postmasters must make it clear to all that they are involved in the Life
Insurance business in a private capacity; the Post office can not be used for
that purpose and it can not be transacted during official hours or while
wearing the official uniform and the insurance money must at all times be kept
separate from the Post Office money.
9.
Under rule 2.14 the Postmasters are prevented from trading in jewellery,
watches, plate or other articles in the office, while outside the Post office,
they must not act as agents or sell any article of merchandise while on duty.
10.
Rule 2.15 restricts the Postmasters from any connection with, ownership or
management of a public house, unless there is no direct access between the
public house and the Post Office. The Post office portion of the premises
should not itself be licensed.
11.
Under rule 2.16 Postmasters are prevented from holding positions as
Collectors of Rents, Debts or Rates; Assistance Officer; Health Inspector;
Officer of a Circuit Court; Sheriff's Officer; Process or Summons Server or
Garda Siochana. The spouse of a person holding a position forbidden to servants
of An Post is ineligible as Postmaster.
12.
Under rule 2.19(a) no officer of An Post can take out a patent or seek
provisional protection for an invention without first obtaining the consent of
the company. Any officer who applies for a patent without the consent of An
Post can be dismissed.
(e)
Submissions of the parties
13.
In support of its request for a certificate, An Post submitted that the
arrangements between the company and the Postmasters did not have the effect of
preventing, restricting or distorting competition in the State or in any part
of the State. They claimed that the arrangements were akin to those of
exclusive dealing contracts with commercial agents and that the EC Notice of
1962 found that such contracts were not caught by Article 85(1). They submitted
that by using the same criteria, the agreement between An Post and the
Postmasters would be found not to contravene
Section 4(1) of the
Competition
Act, 1991. Furthermore, they claimed that the EC Commission Notice of 1979
concerning sub-contract agreements concluded that such arrangements did not
contravene Article 85(1). They submitted that the arrangements between An Post
and the Postmasters was of a sub-contract nature and consequently, following
the same criteria, the arrangements did not contravene
Section 4(1) of
the Act.
They also made a number of submissions in support of a request for a licence,
which it is not necessary to consider in this decision.
Assessment.
(a)
Section 4(1)
14.
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act states that 'all agreements between
undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices
which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion
of competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of
the State are prohibited and void'.
(b) The
Undertakings and the Agreement
15
.
Section 3(1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as ´a person
being an individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons
engaged for gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the
provision of a service.' An Post are engaged for gain in the provision of
postal services and other services such as savings banks and other savings
products, parcels, postal and money order business, Social Welfare and other
agency business as well. The Postmasters are self employed operators, acting as
agents for An Post. Consequently, they are all undertakings within the meaning
of
section 3(1) of the
Competition Act. The agreement is therefore an agreement
between undertakings. The agreement has effect within the State.
Applicability
of Section 4(1)
16.
The Authority considers that Postmasters are agents of An Post. The
Authority does not consider that Postmasters are subcontractors for An Post.
They sell goods and services and receive monies on behalf of An Post and are
remunerated by reference to the volume of services they provide.
They
do not own the goods they sell and the takings of the business are remitted
without deduction to An Post. The postmaster operates as an auxiliary organ of
the principal. The agency agreement between An Post and postmasters is not
itself offensive under
section 4(1). The Authority has stated in its decision
on the Conoco consignee agreement
[1]
that where an agency agreement itself does not offend it is possible that
certain clauses of it might do so. In this agreement, none of the clauses
themselves offend against
section 4(1).
The
Decision
17.
In the opinion of the Authority, An Post and the Postmasters are undertakings
within the meaning of
Section 3(1) of the
Competition Act, and the notified
arrangements for the provision of postal and other services in Sub-Post Offices
by the Postmasters on behalf of An Post constitute an agreement between
undertakings. In the Authority's opinion the agreement does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
18.
The Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the standard agreement between An Post and the Postmasters
for the provision of postal and other services in Sub-Post Offices,
(CA/837/92E), notified to the Competition Authority on 29 September, 1992 under
section 7(1), does not offend against
section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
Massey
Member
27
April, 1995.
[ ] 1
Decision no. 286 of 25.2.94.
© 1995 Irish Competition Authority