British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
DCU/Bank of Ireland [1994] IECA 293 (10th March, 1994)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1994/293.html
Cite as:
[1994] IECA 293
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
DCU/Bank of Ireland [1994] IECA 293 (10th March, 1994)
Notification
No. CA/436/92E - NIHE, Dublin (now Dublin City University)/Allied Irish Banks plc
Decision
No. 293
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Allied Irish Banks plc (AIB) on 30 September 1992 with a request
for a certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in the
event of a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a
licence under
Section 4(2), in respect of a licence agreement between Dublin
City University and AIB.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the grant of a licence by Dublin City University as
grantor to AIB as licensee to provide bank facilities on the premises of the
Dublin City University at Glasnevin, Dublin 9.
(b) The
parties involved
3. AIB
is the largest commercial bank in Ireland with a wide branch network throughout
the State. Dublin City University, as successor to NIHE, Dublin is a self
governing body and a designated institution under the Higher Education
Authority. It is primarily engaged in the provision of third level education
and research.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified agreement was made on 3 December, 1985 between The National Institute
for Higher Education, Dublin and AIB for a term of 20 years from 7 October,
1982. The restricted user clauses in the licence are as follows:
(a) Under
clause 3(21) the licensee covenants "To use the Licensed Premises as a bank
only and in particular but without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing
not to use any part of the Licensed Premises for business purposes (other than
as a bank) or as a residence...."
(b) Under
clause 3(26) the licensee covenants "Not to assign or let or share or part with
possession of the Licensed Premises or any part thereof."
(c) Under
clause 5(6) it is agreed that "During the term hereof and provided the
Licensee is using the Licensed Premises for carrying on its business as a
Banker, the Grantor will not permit in any manner or mode whatsoever the user
of any other part of the building or the grounds thereof for the provision of
any banking or ancillary service which may be in competition with the
Licensee's business as aforesaid."
In
addition there are a number of other provisions relating to the occupation and
maintenance of the premises.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4(1)
5.
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991 refers to agreements between undertakings and
Section 3(1) of
the Act defines undertaking as a "person being an individual, a
body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for gain in the
production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a service."
According to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the VHI case, as delivered by
Finlay C.J, the words "for gain" connote merely an activity carried on or a
service supplied, as in this case, which is done in return for a charge or
payment". Dublin City University is engaged in the provision of the service of
third level education and research for which it receives substantial revenue by
way of fees etc and it is therefore an undertaking engaged for gain in the
provision of a service. AIB is an undertaking engaged for gain in the
provision of banking and other financial services. The notified agreement is
therefore an agreement between undertakings. The agreement has effect within
the State.
6.
The
agreement notified contains standard restrictions and obligations on both
parties which are necessary for the maintenance of a proper relationship in
regard to the operation of the licence and the occupation of the premises.
These do not raise issues under the
Competition Act. The agreement also
provides for exclusivity in relation to the operation by AIB of the banking
concession. In a number of earlier decisions the Authority has already
indicated its view that exclusive user clauses in the letting of premises in a
particular shopping centre or building complex do not offend against
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act. For similar reasons this view also applies in
relation to the grant of an exclusive concession to use premises in a building
complex for the purposes of a business. In this instance there are several
other banks within a radius of 2 miles of the campus. The Authority therefore
considers that the notified agreement between NIHE, Dublin, now Dublin City
University, and AIB does not offend against
section 4(1) of the
Competition
Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between NIHE, Dublin, (now Dublin City
University) and Allied Irish Banks plc in relation to a banking facility in
Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9 notified under
Section 7 on 30
September 1992 (notification no. CA/436/92E), does not offend against
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
10
March 1994
© 1994 Irish Competition Authority