British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Crumlin/ Light Bite [1994] IECA 279 (4th February, 1994)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1994/279.html
Cite as:
[1994] IECA 279
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Crumlin/ Light Bite [1994] IECA 279 (4th February, 1994)
Notification
No CA/460/92E - Crumlin Investments Ltd/Light Bite
Decision
No: 279
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Light Bite on 30 September, 1992 with a request for a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, 1991 or, in the event of a refusal
by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section
4(2), in respect of a lease between Crumlin Investments Ltd and Light Bite.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of the Supermarket unit at Crumlin Shopping
Centre, Crumlin Rd., Dublin 12 between Crumlin Investments Ltd as Landlord and
Light Bite as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Crumlin
Investments Ltd is engaged in the letting of shop units at Crumlin Shopping
Centre. Light Bite is a subsidiary of Power Supermarkets Ltd which is engaged
in the business of supermarkets throughout the State.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified shopping centre lease was executed on 1 January 1979 for a term of 35
years from 17 October 1974. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as
follows:-
(a) Under
clause 4 (19)(a) the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not to use or occupy
the demised premises or any part thereof or permit the same to be used or
occupied except with the consent in writing of the Landlord (such consent not
to be unreasonably withheld but in considering and giving such consent the
Landlord shall be entitled to have full regard to the principles of good estate
management for any other purpose than the trade and business of a supermarket
Retail Store but not for any of the trades or businesses of jeweller (other
than for sale of costume jewellery), watchmaker, hairdresser, beautician,
restauranteur, Bank, Building Society, Travel Agent, employment agent,
accommodation agent, model or photographic agent, auctioneer, estate agent or
credit company or for the sale of motor accessories, sports goods and
equipment, furniture and foods cooked on the premises other than chickens
cooked on the premises or any of them and
PROVIDED
that
an area not exceeding 10,000 square feet can be used for the retail sale of
shoes, textiles clothing of all descriptions and costume jewellery and the
remainder of the demised premises being used for the sale and storage of food
and other products now sold in Supermarkets including intoxicating liquor for
consumption off the premises."
(b) Under
clause 4(16) the tenant covenants
"(a) Not
to assign underlet or part with the possession control or occupation of nor to
franchise the use of part only of the demised premises Provided Always that the
Tenant may franchise the use of (an area) in the demised premises not exceeding
in area ten thousand square feet to Penneys Limited.
(b)
Not
to assign underlet or part with the possession of control or occupation of nor
to franchise the use of the whole of the demised premises without the licence
in writing of the Landlord first obtained which licence shall not be
unreasonably withheld in the case of a respectable and responsible assignee or
underlessee proof of which is furnished to the Landlord
PROVIDED
ALWAYS
....."
(c) Under
clause 7(6) the Landlord covenants "Not during the term to grant a Lease for or
to sell or permit or suffer the sale by any of its Tenants or so far as within
the Landlord's control any sub or under tenants of groceries or food products
in or over an area exceeding 3,000 square feet in any one Unit forming part of
the Shopping Centre unless so ordered or directed by any Court of competent
jurisdiction."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the standard lease.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
5. The
Authority considers that Crumlin Investments Ltd and Light Bite are
undertakings and that the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings.
The agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Crumlin Investments Ltd and Light Bite does not
offend against
section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Crumlin Investments Ltd and Light Bite
in relation to the lease of the premises at Crumlin Shopping Centre, Crumlin
Road, Dublin notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no.
CA/460/92), does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
4
February 1994
© 1994 Irish Competition Authority