British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Erin Executor and Trustee Co Ltd/Peter Mark [1993] IECA 98 (13th October, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/98.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 98
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Erin Executor and Trustee Co Ltd/Peter Mark [1993] IECA 98 (13th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Notification
No. CA/1014/92E - Erin Executor and Trustee Company Ltd/Peter Mark
Decision
No. 98
Price
£0.30
£0.70 incl. postage.
Notification
No: CA/1014/92E - Erin Executor and Trustee Company Ltd/Peter Mark
Decision
No. 98
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Peter Mark on 30 September, l992 with a request for a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, l99l or, in the event of a refusal
by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section
4(2), in respect of a lease between Erin Executor and Trustee Company Ltd and
Peter Mark.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of unit 309B in the Dun Laoghaire Shopping
Centre, Dun Laoghaire, Co. Dublin between Erin Executor and Trustee Company
Ltd, as successor in title to MEPC Ireland Ltd, as Landlord and Peter Mark as
tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Peter
Mark is an unlimited company carrying on the business of hairdressing with
approximately 48 outlets in the State including the salon at Dun Laoghaire
Shopping Centre. Erin Executor and Trustee Company Ltd is an investment
holding company and owner and landlord of the Dun Laoghaire Shopping Centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. Two
leases were notified. The earlier lease was made on 6 December, l976 for a term
of 35 years from 29 September 1976. The restricted user clauses in this lease
are as follows:
(a) Under
clause 4.26 the tenant covenants with the landlord:
"Not
to assign transfer or under let or part with the possession or occupation of
the Demised Unit or any part thereof or suffer any person to occupy the Demised
Unit or any part thereof as a licensee or as concessionaire But So That
Notwithstanding the foregoing the Landlord shall .....not unreasonably withhold
its consent...."
(b) Under
clause 4.28 the tenant covenants with the landlord:
"Not
without the prior consent in writing of the Landlord or its Agent thereunto
lawfully authorised to use or to permit or suffer or allow the Demised Unit or
any part or parts thereof to be used for any purpose other than as set forth in
Part II of the First Schedule hereto and for no other purpose or purposes
whatsoever...."
(c)
In the First Schedule, Part II of the lease the permitted user is defined as
"Hairdressing
salon, allied trades, and hairdressing training centre, and for the sale of
fashion."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
5. Under
a supplemental lease dated 2 April 1990 additional space adjacent to the
existing premises was leased for the unexpired term of the original lease
subject to "the several covenants provisos and conditions in the Principal
Indenture shall apply to the Demised Unit and to the additional premises.....
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
6. The
Authority considers that Peter Mark and Erin Executor and Trustee Company
Limited are undertakings and that the notified lease is an agreement between
undertakings. The agreements have effect within the State.
7. The
Authority considers that the notified agreements, and their restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993 pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreements between Erin Executor and Trustee Company Limited and Peter
Mark do not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
8. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreements between Erin Executor and Trustee Company
Limited and Peter Mark in relation to the lease of the premises at Dun
Laoghaire Shopping Centre, notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992
(notification no. CA/1014/92E), do not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
13
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority