British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Town and County Investments Ltd / Coffee Garden Ltd [1993] IECA 78 (5th October, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/78.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 78
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Town and County Investments Ltd / Coffee Garden Ltd [1993] IECA 78 (5th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 5 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, l99l.
Notification
No: CA/257/92E - Town and County Investments plc/ Coffee Garden Ltd.
Decision
No: 78
Price
£0.30
£0.70
incl. postage.
Notification
No. CA/257/92E - Town and County Investments plc/ Coffee Garden Ltd
Decision
No. 78
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Town and County Investments plc on 30 September 1992 with a
request for a certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in
the event of a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a
licence under
Section 4(2), in respect of a lease between Town and County
Investments plc and Coffee Garden Ltd.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns a sublease relating to Unit 5 at Navan Shopping Centre,
Navan, Co. Meath between Town and County Investments plc as landlord and Coffee
Garden Ltd. as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Town
and County Investments is a public limited company involved in property
investment and development. Coffee Garden Ltd trades at Navan Shopping Centre
as a restaurant/coffee bar.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified shopping centre sub-lease was executed on 27 March 1990 for a term of
35 years from 1 March 1990. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as
follows:-
(a) Under
clause 4.13 (a) the Tenant covenants
"Not
to use the whole or any part of the Demised premises
............
(ix) As
a barber's shop or hairdressing salon
(x)
............
(xi) ...otherwise
than for the Permitted use PROVIDED ALWAYS that notwithstanding anything herein
contained the Tenant shall not be bound to ensure that food or drinks sold on
the Demised premises shall be consumed on the Demised premises
(b) Under
clause 4.13(b) the tenant covenants
"Subject
as aforesaid not to use the whole or any part of the Demised premises for any
business other than the Permitted Use without the previous consent in writing
of the Head Landlord and the Landlord which consents shall not be unreasonably
withheld."
Permitted
Use is defined in clause 1(16) as ..
"use
as or for the purposes of a coffee shop and premises for the sale of fast food
and drinks including the sale of fast food and drinks in disposable containers
but not the sale of "takeaway food" or food for the consumption off the
premises."
(b) Under
clause 4.(15) the tenant covenants
"Not
to transfer assign underlet ......... part with nor share possession or control
of the Demised Premises or any part thereof
SAVE
AND EXCEPT
as is permitted ........(a) The Tenant may transfer assign ....the whole (but
not part only) of the Demised Premises with the previous consents in writing of
the Head Landlord under the Head Lease and of the Landlord which consents shall
not be unreasonably witheld."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Town and County Investments plc and Coffee Garden Ltd
are undertakings and that the notified lease is an agreement between
undertakings. The agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clause and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Town and County Investments plc and Coffee Garden
Ltd does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Town and County Investments plc and
Coffee Garden Ltd in relation to the lease of Unit 5 at Navan Shopping Centre,
Navan, Co. Meath notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification
no. CA/257/92E), does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act,
1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
5
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority