Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Richfield Investments Ltd/ The Governor & Co. of The Bank Ireland [1993] IECA 76 (5th October, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/76.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 76
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Richfield Investments Ltd/ The Governor & Co. of The Bank Ireland [1993] IECA 76 (5th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 5 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, l99l.
Notification
No: CA/338/92E - Richfield Investments Ltd/The Governor and Company of the
Bank of Ireland.
Decision
No: 76
Price
£0.40
£0.80 incl. postage.
Notification
No. CA/338/92E - Richfield Investments Ltd/The Governor and Company of the
Bank of Ireland.
Decision
No: 76
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland (Bank of Ireland)
on 30 September, l992 with a request for a certificate under Section 4(4) of
the Competition Act, l99l or, in the event of a refusal by the Competition
Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under Section 4(2), in respect of a
lease between Richfield Investments Ltd (Richfield) and the Bank of Ireland.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the leases of shop units 18, 19 and 20 in the Thomond
Shopping Centre, Roxboro Road, Limerick, between Richfield as Landlord and the
Bank of Ireland as tenant.
(b) The
parties
3. The
Bank of Ireland is the second largest commercial bank in the State with a
network of 290 branches including the branch at Thomond Shopping Centre.
Richfield is the landlord and owner of the Thomond Shopping Centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified lease in respect of units 19 and 20 was executed on 4 December 1980
for a term of 999 years from 1 November 1980. The restricted user clauses in
this lease are as follows:-
(a) Under
clause C 13 (a) the tenant covenants "Not to assign, sub-let, part with or
share possession or occupation of the demised premises or any part thereof ....
without the consent in writing of the Landlord first obtained."
(b) Under
clause C 11 the tenant covenants "To use the demised premises only for the
carrying on of the trade, provision of the services or sale by retail of the
goods set out in the Fourth Schedule hereto and not without the Landlord's
consent in writing to use or permit or suffer the same or any part thereof to
be used for the carrying on of any other trade, provision of any other service
or the sale of any other goods or for any other purpose whatsoever......"
(c) Under
clause 6 of the First Part to the Second Schedule "The Landlord hereby agrees
not to allow any other unit or part of the Centre to be used as a Commercial
Bank."
5. The
notified lease in relation to Unit 18 was executed on 27 May, l992 for a term
of 999 years from 1 October, l99l. The restricted user clauses in this lease
are as follows:
(a) Under
clause C(9) the tenant covenants with the landlord:
"To
use the demised premises only for the carrying on of the trade, provision of
the services or sale by retail of the goods set out in the Fourth Schedule
hereto ......."
(b) Under
clause C(13)(a) the tenant covenants with the landlord
"Not
to assign, sub-let, part with or share possession or occupation of the demised
premises or any part thereof or suffer any person to occupy or use the demised
premises or any part thereof as Licensee without the consent in writing of the
Landlord being first obtained."
(c) Clause
6 to First Part of the Second Schedule reads
"The Landlord hereby agrees not to allow any other unit or part of the Centre
to be used as a Commercial Bank."
(d) In
the Fourth Schedule, the Limitation of user clause reads
"The
premises shall be used as a Commercial Bank premises and for banking related
and associated Services and Businesses only, and the Landlord hereby agrees not
to allow any other unit or part of the Centre to be used as a Commercial Bank."
6. In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in both leases.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
7. The
Authority considers that the Bank of Ireland and Richfield Investments Ltd are
undertakings and that the notified lease is a agreement between undertakings.
The agreement has effect within the State.
8. The
Authority considers that the notified agreements, and their restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, do not have the object of effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreements between Richfield Investments Limited and the Bank of
Ireland do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
9. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreements between Richfield Investments Limited and
the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland in relation to the lease of the
premises at Thomond Shopping Centre, notified under Section 7 on 30 September
1992 (notification no. CA/338/92E), do not offend against Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
5
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority