British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Denis Farrell/Peter Mark [1993] IECA 72 (5th October, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/72.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 72
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Denis Farrell/Peter Mark [1993] IECA 72 (5th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 5 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, l99l.
Notification
No: CA/1020/92E - Denis Farrell/Peter Mark.
Decision
No: 72
Price
£0.30
£0.70 incl. postage.
Notification
No: CA/1020/92E - Denis Farrell/Peter Mark.
Decision
No: 72
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Peter Mark on 30 September, 1992 with a request for a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, 1991 or, in the event of a refusal
by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section
4(2), in respect of a lease between Denis Farrell and Peter Mark.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of unit no. 4 Market Yard, St. Kieran's Street,
Kilkenny between Denis Farrell as lessor and Peter Mark as lessee.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Peter
Mark is an unlimited company carrying on the business of hairdressing at
approximately 48 outlets in the State including the Market Yard salon. Denis
Farrell is the owner and landlord of shop units at Market Yard.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified lease was made on 1 September, 1986 for a period of 35 years. The
restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:
(a) Clause
3.20 recites "The entire dwelling is developed as a single unit and Lessor
will not make any lettings or sale of any unit for a business or purpose which
would be in competition with the business carried on in any other unit and for
this purpose the lessee shall have the exclusive use of the demised premises
for the purposes of a ladies and gents hairdressers/hairdressing salon and the
retail sale of allied products only. The lessee shall be permitted to use the
demised premises for the sale of fashion products and for no other purposes
save with the lessor's written consent which consent shall not be unreasonably
refused....."
(b) Under
clause 3.22 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not to assign transfer or
underlet or part with the possession or occupation of the demised premises or
any part thereof as a licensee but so that notwithstanding the foregoing the
lessor shall not unreasonably withhold its consent...."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
5. The
Authority considers that Peter Mark and Denis Farrell are undertakings and that
the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings. The agreement has
effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Denis Farrell and Peter Mark does not offend against
section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Denis Farrell and Peter Mark in
relation to the lease of the premises at Market Yard, St. Kieran's Street,
Kilkenny, notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no.
CA/1020/92E), does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
5
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority