British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Max Developments Ltd/ McCormack [1993] IECA 40 (5th October, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/40.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 40
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Max Developments Ltd/ McCormack [1993] IECA 40 (5th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 5 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, l99l.
Notification
No: CA/207/92E - Max Developments Ltd/Wilhelmina McCormack.
Decision
No: 40
Price
£0.30
£0.70 incl. postage.
Notification
No. CA/207/92E - Max Developments Ltd/Wilhelmina Mc Cormack
Decision
No. 40
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Wilhelmina McCormack on 30 September 1992 with a request for a
certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in the event of
a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2), in respect of a lease between Max Developments Ltd and Wilhelmina
Mc Cormack.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of a shop unit, Unit 21, at Donaghmede Shopping
Centre, Donaghmede, Dublin 13 between Max Developments Ltd as landlord and
Wilhelmina Mc Cormack as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Max
Developments Ltd the present Landlord is engaged in the letting of shop units
at Donaghmede Shopping Centre. Wilhelmina Mc Cormack who now holds the tenancy
interest in unit 21 is engaged in the business of hairdressing at Donaghmede
Shopping Centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified shopping centre lease was executed on 7 June 1973 for a period of 35
years from 1 April 1973. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause c(12) of the agreement the tenant covenants
"To
use the demised premises only for the carrying on of the trade, provision of
services or sale by retail of the goods set out in the Fourth Schedule hereto
and not without the Landlord's consent in writing to use or permit to suffer
the same or any part thereof to be used for the carrying on of any other trade,
provision of any other service or the sale of any other goods or for any other
purpose whatever....."
The
Fourth Schedule under the heading "Limitation of user clause" reads
"The
premises are to be used as a Male and Female Hairdressers shop only."
(b) Under
clause c(14)(a) the tenant covenants with the landlord
"Not
to assign, sublet, part with or share possession or occupation of the demised
premises or any part thereof or suffer any person to occupy or use the demised
premises or any part thereof as licensee without the consent in writing of the
Landlord being first obtained........
(c) Under
clause 6 of the First Part of the Second Schedule to the Lease the Landlord
undertakes
"not
to demise any other male or female hairdressing shop unit in the Donaghmede
Town Centre during the currency of this lease for so long as Unit 21 is
continuously used as a Hairdressers shop only....."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Max Developments Ltd and Wilhelmina Mc Cormack are
undertakings and that the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings.
The agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Max Developments Ltd and Wilhelmina McCormack does
not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Max Developments Ltd and Wilhelmina Mc
Cormack in relation to the lease of the premises at Unit 21, Donaghmede
Shopping Centre, Donaghmede, Dublin 13 notified under
Section 7 on 30 September
1992 (notification no. CA/207/92E), does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of
the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
5
October 1993.
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority