British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Navenby/Savage Plastic Packaging Ltd/Savpack/Noel Savage [1993] IECA 35 (24th September, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/35.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 35
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Navenby/Savage Plastic Packaging Ltd/Savpack/Noel Savage [1993] IECA 35 (24th September, 1993)
Notification
No. CA/864/92E - Navenby Limited/Savage Plastic Packaging Limited/Savpak
Limited/Noel Savage and others
Decision
No. 35
Introduction
1. An
agreement between Navenby Limited (Navenby) and Noel Savage, Kevin Savage,
Christopher Kiernan, and Industrial Credit Corporation (the vendors) containing
a non-compete clause pursuant to the sale of the entire issued share capital of
Savage Plastic Packaging Limited (Savage) and Savpak Limited (Savpak) was
notified to the Competition Authority on 30 September 1992. The notification
requested a certificate or, in the event of a certificate being refused, a
licence.
The
Facts
(a) The
Subject of the Notification
2. The
notification relates to an agreement dated 28 April 1989 between the vendors
and Navenby whereby the vendors agree to sell the entire issued share capital
of Savage and Savpak to Navenby. The agreement also contains a non-compete
provision.
(b) The
Parties
3. Savage
and Savpak are limited companies incorporated in the State. Prior to its sale,
the vendors had a 100% interest in both companies. Navenby is a limited
company with registered offices at 41-45 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2. As
part of the sale agreement, the vendors have received shares in Navenby by way
of consideration for the sale of Savage and Savpak.
(c) The
Arrangements
4. The
notification relates to an agreement, dated 28 April 1989, for the sale of the
entire share capital of Savage and Savpak to Navenby. The agreement contained
a non-compete clause which prevented the vendors from becoming involved in any
business which competed with those sold for a period of two years from the date
of completion. This period expired on 28 April 1991.
Assessment
(a) Section
4(1)
5. Section
4(1) of the Competition Act states that 'all agreements between undertakings,
decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as
their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition
in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State are
prohibited and void'.
(b) The
Undertakings and the Agreement
6. Section
3(1) of the Competition Act defines an undertaking as ´a person being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service.' The parties to the present agreement are the vendors and Navenby.
Navenby is limited company with registered offices in Dublin. It is engaged
for gain through its interest in Savage and Savpak, both of which are engaged
for gain in the packaging business. Prior to completion of the agreement, the
vendors were the beneficial owners of the companies and were therefore
undertakings within the meaning of the Act at the time of the agreement. This
is consistent with the Authority's decisions in ACT/Kindle and Scully/Tyrrell.
(c) Applicability
of Section 4(1)
7. As
the sale of business was completed prior to 1 October, 1991, the date on which
the Competition Act came into force, this element of the agreement had been
discharged by performance before the Act commenced. The property which was the
subject of the agreement had been transferred. In the Authority's view, the
prohibition in Section 4(1) only applies to a current or continuing contractual
commitment or one entered into subsequent to the coming into force of the Act.
As the merger or sale element of the 1991 transaction was discharged prior to
the commencement of the Act, that aspect of the arrangements does not come
within the scope of Section 4(1).
8. The
non-compete clause had also expired before the Act came into force. Thus, in
the Authority's view, there was not an agreement between undertakings in
existence at, or since, the time the Act came into force. The notification is
therefore invalid and the Authority is unable to grant a certificate or licence.
The
Decision
9. In
the Authority's opinion, Navenby Limited, Noel Savage, Kevin Savage,
Christopher Kiernan, and Industrial Credit Corporation are undertakings within
the meaning of Section 3(1) of the Competition Act. As the entire agreement
had expired before 1 October 1991, the notified arrangements do not constitute
an agreement which was in existence at the time, or since, the Act came into
force; it cannot be validly notified under Section 7(1) or 7(2) of the
Competition Act and the Authority cannot issue a certificate or licence in
respect of the notification.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
Massey
Member
24
September 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority