Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Viva/McDonald [1993] IECA 34 (24th September, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/34.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 34
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Viva/McDonald [1993] IECA 34 (24th September, 1993)
Notification
No. CA/14/93 - Viva Travel/McDonald Travel.
Decision
No. 34
Introduction
1. An
agreement for the sale by Grainne McDonald Travel Limited (McDonald Travel) of
the assets and goodwill of a travel agency business located in Dun Laoghaire to
Viva Travel Dun Laoghaire Limited (Viva) was notified to the Competition
Authority on 14 April 1993. The notification requested a certificate under
section 4(4), or failing that, a licence under Section 4(2) of the Competition
Act.
The
Facts
(a) The
Subject of the Notifications
2. The
notification relates to an agreement, dated 7 January 1993, between Viva Travel
Dun Laoghaire Limited, John and Mary O'Donoghoe, William Murphy and Grainne
McDonald Travel Limited, for the sale by McDonald Travel of the assets and
property, including goodwill, of its travel agency business located at Dun
Laoghaire, to Viva. The agreement included certain non-compete provisions.
The parties indicated in a letter dated 27 July 1993 their intention to amend
the non-compete provisions after the Authority had expressed some concern
regarding their duration.
(b) The
Parties
3. McDonald
Travel and Viva are travel agents based in Ireland and engaged in the travel
agency business. McDonald Travel has operated the business concerned in Dun
Laoghaire for about 13 years and continues to trade from a premises in Dame
Street in Dublin City. Viva is a new firm entering the market. Messrs.
William Murphy and John O'Donoghoe are directors of McDonald Travel while Ms.
Mary O'Donohoe was a guarantor on foot of the company's lease of the premises
in Dun Laoghaire.
(c) The
Products and the Market
4. The
agreement concerns the sale of a travel agency business. The relevant market
is that for travel agency services. The Authority considers that the market
for such services is largely a localised one, with travel agents, particularly
those located outside of centre city areas, attracting customers from the
immediate vicinity of the business. It is true that consumers in the Dun
Laoghaire area may very well compare the services offered by a local travel
agent with those of agents located in Dublin city. Consumers in other parts of
Dublin city or of the country generally are unlikely, however, to go to an
agency located in Dun Laoghaire when shopping around. Thus, while to some
extent the business is competing with others located in Dublin city, the
Authority believes that the relevant geographical market is Dun Laoghaire and
its environs.
(d) The
Arrangements
5. The
arrangements provide for the acquisition by Viva of Mc Donald Travel's Dun
Laoghaire business. Under the terms of the agreement as notified, McDonald
Travel and Mr. and Mrs. O'Donohoe and Mr. Murphy undertook not to:
(i)
engage in a travel agency business in Dun Laoghaire or within a five mile
radius for a period of five years;
(ii)
advertise that Grainne McDonald Travel has moved to Dame Street and the name is
not to be used in advertising, except in respect of particular customers
[1]
for a period of 15 months;
(iii)
advertise, market or attempt to solicit clients of the business or any
individuals who were clients within the previous two years, for a period of two
years
[2].
(e) Submissions
of the Parties
6. Viva
argued that the restriction contained in the agreement was necessary to enable
them, as a new entrant to build up the business to the extent that they would
be in a position to compete fairly with any competing business that McDonald
Travel might open in Dun Laoghaire. They pointed out that McDonald Travel was
a commercial concern with considerable experience in the relevant line of
business and that, were it to be allowed compete with Viva immediately, this
would be unfair.
(f) Subsequent
Developments
7. The
Authority expressed some concerns regarding the duration of the non-compete
clause in the agreement, whereupon the parties agreed to shorten the duration
of the restriction on being engaged in a travel agency business in Dun
Laoghaire or within a radius of five miles from five years to three. Viva
argued strongly that under the circumstances three years was the minimum period
of restriction required to secure the transfer of the goodwill of the business.
They pointed out that McDonald Travel had operated in Dun Laoghaire for 13
years, that it continued to trade from Dame Street and that the vendors could
easily re-open in Dun Laoghaire in the absence of a non-compete clause.
Assessment
(a)
Section 4(1)
8. Section
4(1) of the Competition Act states that ´all agreements between
undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices
which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion
of competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of
the State are prohibited and void'.
(b) The
Undertakings and the Agreement
9. Section
3(1) of the Competition Act defines an undertaking as ´a person being an
individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged for
gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of a
service.' McDonald Travel and Viva are both corporate bodies engaged in the
provision of travel agency services for gain, and are therefore undertakings.
The arrangements constitute an agreement between undertakings.
(c) Applicability
of Section 4(1)
9 In
the Authority's view the only issue which arose under section 4(1) related to
the non-compete clauses. The sale of business itself is, if anything,
pro-competitve, since it enables a new firm to enter the market. The
Authority's views on non-compete clauses in such agreements have been set out
in a number of decisions. Provided the restriction does not exceed what is
necessary for the protection of that goodwill in terms of its duration,
geographic coverage and subject matter, then it does not, in the Authority's
opinion, offend against Section 4(1). In General Semiconductor, the Authority
indicated that it considers a period of two years to be generally adequate for
such purposes
[3].
10. The
restrictions on engaging in the travel agency business in Dun Laoghaire or
within a radius of five miles are not offensive in terms of subject matter and
geographic scope. The duration of the restriction was five years from the date
of completion. This is considerably longer than what the Authority normally
considers adequate to secure the transfer of the goodwill. The parties
subsequently agreed to reduce the duration of the restriction to three years.
While this still exceeds what the Authority considers adequate in most cases,
in this instance it believes such a period is justified. Viva is a new entrant
to the market, consumers only deal with a travel agent infrequently, and
McDonald Travel could still compete, to some extent, from their Dame Street
premises.
11. The
Authority has previously certified a three year non-compete clause in the case
of a similar business for similar reasons in Athlone Travel
[4].
In allowing a three year non-compete clause in that instance it stated that:
´the
Authority believes that a period of three years is justified in this case for
similar reasons to those outlined in Nallen/O'Toole. Consumers tend to
purchase the products in question infrequently perhaps once a year. In
addition personal contact with customers is an important factor in the
business....In addition although Athlone Travel only began operating tours to
Blackpool in May 1991, it is still active in the travel business. It might
therefore be relatively easy for it to quickly recapture its former customers
if it were to resume offering tours to Blackpool. For these reasons it
wouldappear that the period specified in the agreement is no more than is
required to secure the complete transfer of the goodwill.'
12. The
restrictions on advertising McDonald Travel's move to Dame Street for 15
months, and on soliciting former customers for up to two years, do not offend
against section 4(1) since they do not go beyond what is necessary to secure
the transfer of the goodwill of the business.
The
Decision
13. In
the Authority's opinion, McDonald Travel and Viva are undertakings within the
meaning of Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, and the notified arrangements
for the acquisition by Viva of the Dun Laoghaire business of McDonald Travel,
constitute an agreement between undertakings. The Authority believes that in
the light of the amendments proposed to clause 9(l) in the letter of 27 July
1993, the restrictions in the agreement are no more than is necessary to secure
the transfer of the goodwill of the business to Viva. The agreement of 7
January 1993 for the acquisition of the Dun Laoghaire business of McDonald
Travel by Viva between Viva Travel Limited, Grainne McDonald Travel Limited,
Mr. and Mrs. O'Donohoe and Mr. Murphy, as amended by the letter of 27 July
1993, does not, in the Authority's opinion, offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
14. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement of 7 January 1993 for the acquisition of the
business of McDonald Travel Dun Laoghaire between Viva Travel Limited, Grainne
McDonald Travel Limited, Mr. and Mrs. O'Donohoe and Mr. Murphy, (notification
no. CA/14/93), notified on 14 April 1993 under
Section 7, as amended by the
letter of 27 July 1993, does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition
Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
Massey
Member
24
September 1993.
[ ] 1 The
restriction does not apply to existing corporate/business account clients who
have already transferred to the Dame Street business of McDonald Travel.
[ ]2 The
restriction does not apply to existing corporate/business account clients who
have already transferred to the Dame Street business of McDonald Travel.
[ ]3 Competition
Authority decision no. 10, GI/General Semiconductor Industries, (CA/51/92 and
CA/52/92), 23 October 1992.
[ ]4 Competition
Authority decision no. 3, Athlone Travel/Michael Stein Travel, 4 June 1992.
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority