Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Aviette Trust Company Ltd/Tenants of Firhouse Shopping Centre [1993] IECA 267 (15th December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/267.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 267
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Aviette Trust Company Ltd/Tenants of Firhouse Shopping Centre [1993] IECA 267 (15th December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA/871/92E - Aviette Trust Company Ltd/ Tenants of Firhouse Shopping Centre.
Decision
No: 267
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Aviette Trust Company Limited on 30 September, l992 with a request
for a certificate under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, l99l or in the
event of a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a
licence under Section 4(2) in respect of leases between Aviette Trust Company
Ltd and its tenants at Firhouse Shopping Centre.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the leases in respect of shop units in the Firhouse
Shopping Centre, Tallaght, Dublin 24 between Aviette Trust Company Ltd as
landlord and 14 tenants.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Aviette
Trust Company Ltd is the owner and landlord of the Firhouse Shopping Centre,
Tallaght, Dublin 24. The tenants are engaged in various retail and service
activities at the shopping centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. 6
standard shopping centre leases were notified viz
(i) The
standard lease relating to l, lA, 8 and l5 has the following restricted user
clauses viz.
(a) Under
clause 3.2(3) the tenant covenants with the landlord "To keep the Demised
Premises for the use
Provided
Always
that the premises or any part thereof shall not be used for the sale, vending,
consumption or otherwise of any type of food stuffs on the said premises for
human or animal consumption only and, not without the Landlord's prior consent
in writing, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, to use or permit or
suffer the same or any part thereof to be used for any other purpose."
(b) Under
clause 3.2(5) the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not to assign transfer or
underlet or part with the possession or occupation of the demised premises or
any part thereof or suffer any person to occupy the demised premises or any
part thereof as a licencee
BUT
SO THAT NOTWITHSTANDING
the foregoing the Landlord shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to an
assignment of the entire or a suitable portion thereof (hereinafter called "a
portion") or underletting of the entire or a portion of the demised premises..."
(c) Under
clause 3.10 the tenant covenants "Subject to the provisions of 3.2(3) hereof,
the tenant ......hereby covenants with the Landlord not to use or permit to be
used the Demised Premises or any part thereof for the sale of food or food
products."
(ii) The
lease notified for unit 4 has a term of 35 years. The restricted user clauses
in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause 12(a) the tenant covenants with the landlord:
"...and
not to use or permit the premises hereby demised to be used for any purpose
other than for the sale and hire of videos and ancillary electrical goods
specifically related to videos and excluding televisions and radios..."
(b) Under
clause 30 the tenant covenants with the landlord
(a) Not
to assign, underlet or part with or share the possession of any part of the
demised premises.
(b) Not,
without the consent of the Lessor, to assign, underlet or part with or share
the possession of the whole of the demised premises except to a suitable and
solvent Lessee ......
(iii) The
lease notified for unit 13 has a term of 35 years. The restricted user clauses
in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause 12 the tenant covenants with the landlord "...and not to use or permit
the premises hereby demised to be used for any purpose other than a Dry
Cleaning Service
(b) Under
clause 30 the tenant covenants with the landlord not to assign, underlet or
part with or share the possession of any part of the demised premises.
not
to assign, underlet or part with or share the possession of the whole of the
demised premises except to a suitable and solvent tenant and subject to the
consent of the Lessor Provided Always ....
(iv) The
lease notified for units 5/6 has a term of 10,000 years. The restricted user
clauses in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause l2 the tenant covenants with the landlord "...and not without the prior
written consent of the Lessor which consent shall not be unreasonably refused
or withheld to use or permit the premises hereby demised to be used for any
purpose other than for the sale of haberdashery, soft furnishings, linens,
household linens, furniture, carpets, curtain rails, wallpaper and paint.
(b) Under
clause 31 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not to assign, underlet or
part with or share the possession of all or any part of the demised premises
without the consent of the Lessor which shall not be unreasonably refused or
withheld."
(v) The
lease notified in respect of the supermarket unit has a term of 9,980 years
from l December, l99l. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause 3.2(2) the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not without the prior
consent in writing of the Landlord or its agent thereunto lawfully authorised,
to use or to permit or suffer or allow the Demised Premises or any part
thereof, to be used for any purpose other than as a general supermarket and
ancilliary goods or services or other retail trades or businesses which do not
require planning permission for change of use...
PROVIDED
ALWAYS AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND DECLARED
that upon any application by the Tenant or any under-tenant of the Tenant for
liberty to alter or change the aforesaid permitted use of the Demised Premises
the Landlord shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to such proposed
change of user."
(b) In
a supplementary letter to the lease the landlord confirmed to the tenant
subject to the existing uses granted in the Centre ........"that you, your
successors and assigns shall have the exclusive right from the date hereof to
use the entire of the Demised Premises as a General Supermarket and we hereby
undertake not to let or sell any other unit in the Centre for a period of 21
years which would entitle the occupant to use same for the business of a
General Supermarket or unit for the sale of Liquor, Wines or Spirits off the
premises subject to the proviso herein contained and we will not permit any
Tenant occupying any unit in the Centre or any Assignee of the Tenant within
the Centre to use any unit or part thereof for such purposes ............"
(vii) The
standard lease notified in respect of units 2, 3, 7, 9, l0/ll, 12 and l4
contains the following restricted user clauses viz.
(a) Under
clause 12 the tenant covenants with the landlord "...and not to use or permit
the premises hereby demised to be used for any purpose other than
."
(b) Under
clause 30 the tenant covenants with the landlord
Not
to assign, underlet or part with or share the possession of any part of the
demised premises
Not,
without the consent of the Lessor, to assign, underlet or part with or share
the possession of the whole of the demised premises..."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in all the leases.
5. Aviette
has supplied details of the permitted user attaching to each tenancy whereby
the tenant is restricted to particular specified retail or service activities.
In addition details of exclusive user granted in respect of Unit 12 as a
Sports/Leisure/Hobby shop has been supplied.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
6. The
Authority considers that Aviette Trust Company Ltd and its tenants are
undertakings and that the notified leases are agreements between undertakings.
The agreements have effect within the State.
7. The
Authority considers that the notified agreements, and their restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September, l993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil of l0
September, l993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreements between Aviette Trust Company Ltd and its tenants does not
offend against section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
8. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreements between Aviette Trust Company Ltd and its
tenants in relation to the lease of premises at Firhouse Shopping Centre,
Tallaght, Dublin 24, notified under Section 7 on 30 September, l992
(notification no. CA/871/92E), do not offend against Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
15
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority