British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Mall Holdings Ltd/Cassidy's Familys Pharmacies Ltd [1993] IECA 250 (15th December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/250.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 250
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Mall Holdings Ltd/Cassidy's Familys Pharmacies Ltd [1993] IECA 250 (15th December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA/198/92E - Mall Holdings Ltd/Cassidy's Family Pharmacies Ltd
Decision
No: 250
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Cassidy's Family Pharmacies Ltd (Cassidy's) on 29 September, l992
with a request for a certificate under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act,
l99l or, in the event of a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a
certificate, a licence under section 4(2), in respect of a lease between Mall
Holdings Ltd and Cassidy's.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of shop unit 5 at the Crescent Shopping
Centre, Dooradoyle, Limerick between Mall Holdings Ltd as Lessor and Cassidy's
as lessee.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Mall
Holdings Ltd is engaged in the letting of shop units at Crescent Shopping
Centre. Cassidy's trades as a retail pharmacy at the shopping centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified lease was made on 11 December, 1978 for a term of 32 years from 1
November, 1973. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause E 12 the tenant covenants with the landlord "..... not to use or suffer
to be used the demised premises or any part thereof for Banking purposes nor as
a Restaurant nor for any purpose other than a Chemist's shop without the
consent of the Lessor under its seal first obtained."
(b) Under
clause E 15 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not to assign (other than
by way of Mortgage) or under-let or share or part with the possession of the
demised premises or any part thereof or otherwise alienate same without the
previous written consent of the Lessor such consent not to be unreasonably
with-held."
(c) Under
a separate letter dated 26 February, 1976 Mall Holdings stated " ......reaffirm
that the only condition agreed was that we would not let another unit as an
individual pharmacy."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment-
The Applicability of Section 4(1)
5. The
Authority considers that Mall Holdings Ltd and Cassidys are undertakings and
that the notified agreement is an agreement between undertakings. The
agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Mall Holdings Ltd and Cassidy's Family Pharmacies
Ltd does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Mall Holdings Ltd and Cassidy's Family
Pharmacies Ltd in relation to the lease of the premises at the Crescent
Shopping Centre, Dooradoyle, Limerick notified under Section 7 on 29 September,
1992 (notification no. CA/198/92E), does not offend against section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
15
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority