Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
AIB Investment Nominees Ltd, Duncove Ltd & Berryvale Ltd/ Tenants of Arthur's Quay Ctr. [1993] IECA 247 (15th December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/247.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 247
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
AIB Investment Nominees Ltd, Duncove Ltd & Berryvale Ltd/ Tenants of Arthur's Quay Ctr. [1993] IECA 247 (15th December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA/222/92E - AIB Investment Nominees Limited, Doncove Ltd and Berryvale
Ltd/Tenants at Arthur's Quay Centre.
Decision
No: 247
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by AIB Investment Nominees Limited, Doncove Limited and Berryvale
Limited on 30 September, l992 with a request for a certificate under Section
4(4) of the Competition Act, l99l or, in the event of a refusal by the
Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under Section, 4(2) in
respect of leases between AIB Investment Nominees Limited, Doncove Limited,
Berryvale Limited and their tenants at Arthur's Quay Centre.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the leases relating to 40 shop and other units in
Arthur's Quay Shopping Centre, Arthurs Quay, Limerick between AIB Investment
Nominees Limited, Doncove Limited and Berryvale Limited as landlords and their
tenants.
(b) The
parties involved
3. AIB
Investment Nominees Limited, Doncove Limited and Berryvale Limited are the
owners and landlords of the Arthur's Quay Shopping Centre. The tenants are
engaged in various trading and professional activities at the centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
standard lease notified in draft form contains the following restricted user
clauses viz.
(a) Under
clause 4.21 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not to assign, transfer or
underlet or part with the possession or occupation of the Demised Premises or
any part thereof or suffer any person to occupy the Demised Premises or any
part thereof as a Licensee or as concessionaire and in no circumstances or
event to an assignee who would carry on any business of a non-retail nature
including Banks and Building Societies
BUT
SO THAT NOTWITHSTANDING
the foregoing the Landlord shall not unreasonably withhold its consent..."
(b) Under
clause 4.22 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not without the prior
consent in writing of the Landlord or its Agent thereunder lawfully authorised
to use or permit or suffer or allow the Demised Premises or any part or parts
thereof to be used for any purpose other than as set forth in Part II of the
First Schedule hereto..
.Provided
Always And It Is Hereby Agreed And Declared
that upon any application by the Tenant or any under-Tenant of the Tenant for
liberty to alter or change the aforesaid permitted user of the Demised Premises
the Landlord shall not unreasonably withhold its consent..."
(c) Under
clause 4.23.2 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not at any time to use
the Demised Premises or any part thereof or allow the same to be used as a
butcher shop or a greengrocers shop or as a Building Society or Bank or for the
sale of food for consumption on or off the Demised Premises or for the sale of
Aran knit goods or machine representations of Aran knit goods or second-hand
goods."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
5. The
Landlords have supplied details of the permitted user under clause 4.22
applicable to each lease whereby the tenant is restricted to particular
specified retail or service activities. They have also advised that exclusive
user has been granted in respect of 4 tenancies covering a newsagents,
footwear, a pharmacy, a restaurant and a bank.
6. A
standard 695 year lease in respect of 4 office units was also notified, the
permitted user in which was defined as "offices". The standard restrictive
covenants and obligations in the lease were similar to those for the shop units
with the exception of the clauses described at paras. 4(a) and (c) above, which
were omitted.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
7. The
Authority considers that AIB Investment Nominees Limited, Doncove Limited,
Berryvale Limited and the tenants are undertakings and that the notified leases
are agreements between undertakings. The agreements have effect within the
State.
8. The
Authority considers that the notified agreements, and their restricted user
clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and obligations, do not have
the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in
trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State, for
the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2 September, l993 in
respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil of l0 September, l993,
pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the notified agreements
between AIB Investment Nominees Limited, Doncove Limited, Berryvale Limited and
their tenants does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
9. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreements between AIB Investment Nominees Limited,
Doncove Limited, Berryvale Limited and their tenants in relation to the leases
of premises at Arthur's Quay Shopping Centre, Arthur's Quay, Limerick, notified
under Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no. CA/222/92E), do not
offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
15
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority