British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Arthur's Quay Developments Ltd/ Power Supermarkets Ltd [1993] IECA 245 (15th December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/245.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 245
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Arthur's Quay Developments Ltd/ Power Supermarkets Ltd [1993] IECA 245 (15th December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA/587/92E - Arthur's Quay Developments Ltd/ Power Supermarkets Ltd
Decision
No: 245
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Power Supermarkets Limited on 30 September, l992 with a request for
a certificate under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, l99l or, in the event
of a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence
under Section 4(2) in respect of a lease between Arthur's Quay Developments
Limited and Power Supermarkets Ltd.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease relating to the supermarket unit in Arthur's
Quay Centre, Arthur's Quay, Limerick between Arthur's Quay Developments Limited
as landlord and Power Supermarkets Ltd as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Power
Supermarkets Limited is engaged in the business as a supermarket with outlets
throughout the State. Arthur's Quay Developments Limited was the developer and
landlord of the Arthur's Quay Centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified lease was part of an agreement for lease dated 6 May 1988 with a term
of 700 years from l May, l989 or such other date that may be agreed by the
parties. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause 4.21 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not during the first
fifteen years of the term hereby granted without the prior consent in writing
of the Landlord or its Agent thereunto lawfully authorised to use or permit or
suffer or allow the Demised Premises or any part or parts thereof to be used
for any purpose other than as set forth in Part II of the First Schedule hereto
and for no other purpose or purposes whatsoever
PROVIDED
ALWAYS AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND DECLARED
that
upon any application by the Tenant or any under-Tenant of the Tenant for
liberty to alter or change the aforesaid permitted user of the Demised Premises
the Landlord shall not unreasonably withhold its consent..."
(b) Under
clause 5.6.1 the landlord covenants with the tenant "For so long as the Demised
Premises are used as a Supermarket the Landlord for itself its successors and
assigns hereby covenants with the Tenant that it its successors and assigns
will not lease or sell any unit in the Shopping Centre other than Units in the
area hatched in Blue on the map annexed hereto in Appendix A for the purposes
of a butchers shop or a greengrocers shop."
(c) Under
Clause 5.6.2 the landlord covenants with the tenant "For so long as the Demised
Premises are used as a Supermarket the Landlord hereby covenants to refuse its
consent to a change of user of any unit in the Shopping Centre other than a
unit in the area hatched in Blue on the map annexed hereto in Appendix A
whereby the Unit would be used as a Butchers shop or a Greengrocers shop."
(d) In
the First Schedule, Part II the permitted user is defined as follows "As a
Supermarket and/or Departmental Shop or Store and/or Retail Shop or store
including the sale or baking of food or food products of all kinds trading by
way of licensing and franchising and making concessions and for the sale of
Intoxicating Liquor whether for consumption on or off the premises."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
5. The
Authority considers that Power Supermarkets Limited and Arthur's Quay
Developments Limited are undertakings and that the notified lease is an
agreement between undertakings. The agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September, l993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil of l0
September, l993, pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Arthur's Quay Developments Limited and Power
Supermarkets Ltd does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act,
l99l.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Arthur's Quay Developments Limited and
Power Supermarkets Ltd in relation to the lease of the premises at Arthur's
Quay Centre, Arthur's Quay, Limerick notified under Section 7 on 30 September
1992 (notification no. CA/587/92E), does not offend against Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
15
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority