British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Michael Reilly & Sons (now Nabol Developments Ltd)/ Phoenix Newsagents Ltd [1993] IECA 240 (15th December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/240.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 240
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Michael Reilly & Sons (now Nabol Developments Ltd)/ Phoenix Newsagents Ltd [1993] IECA 240 (15th December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA/513/92E - Michael Reilly and Sons Ltd (now Nabola Developments
Ltd)/Phoenix Newsagents Ltd
Decision
No. 240
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Phoenix Newsagents Ltd on 30 September 1992 with a request for a
certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991, or in the event of
a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2) in respect of a lease between Michael Reilly and Sons Ltd and
Phoenix Newsagents Ltd.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of a shop unit, Unit 7, Maynooth Shopping
Centre, Maynooth, Co. Kildare between Michael Reilly and Sons Ltd as landlord
and Phoenix Newsagents Ltd as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Michael
Reilly and Sons Ltd was engaged in the letting of shop units at Maynooth
Shopping Centre. Its successor in title, Nabola is now similarly engaged.
Phoenix Newsagents Ltd, which purchased the tenancy interest in Unit 7 in
December 1988 carries on the business of newsagents at the centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified shopping centre lease was executed on 1 November 1982 for a period of
30 years from 1 September 1982. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as
follows:
(a) Under
clause 10 section III of the agreement the tenant covenants "To use the
demised premises for the purpose of a Newsagents shop only and not without the
Landlord's consent in writing which shall not be unreasonably withheld to use
or permit or suffer the same or any part thereof to be used for any other
purpose (such permitted use to include retail sale of stationery cards toys and
allied goods........)
(b) Under
clause 12 section III the tenant covenants "not to assign sublet part with or
share possession of a part (as distinct from the whole) of the demised premises
under any circumstances whatever or the whole of the demised premises without
the prior consent in writing of the Landlord (such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld).....
(c) Under
a separate covenant attached to the agreement the landlord covenants with the
original tenant ..and their permitted assigns "that for so long as the within
demised premises are used for the user permitted by Clause 10 of
Section 3 of
the within Lease that neither we the landlord nor any of our tenants in the
Maynooth Shopping Centre shall carry on or permit to be permitted to carry on
in the said Centre the business of a newsagency including the retail sale of
stationery cards toys and allied goods."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Michael Reilly and Sons Ltd were and its successors
Nabola Developments Ltd, and Phoenix Newsagents Ltd are undertakings and that
the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings. The agreement has
effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other restrictive clauses and obligations, does
not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting
competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of
the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2 September
1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10 September 1993,
pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the notified agreement
between Michael Reilly and Sons Ltd (now Nabola Developments Ltd) and Phoenix
Newsagents Ltd does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Michael Reilly and Sons Ltd (now
Nabola Developments Ltd) and Phoenix Newsagents Ltd in relation to the lease of
the premises at Unit 5 Maynooth Shopping Centre, Maynooth, Co. Kildare
notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no. CA/513/92E),
does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
15
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority