British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Drakebury Construction Ltd/Governor & Company of the Bank of Ireland [1993] IECA 233 (15th December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/233.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 233
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Drakebury Construction Ltd/Governor & Company of the Bank of Ireland [1993] IECA 233 (15th December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA/339/92E - Drakebury Construction Ltd/ Governor and Company of the Bank
of Ireland
Decision
No. 233
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland (Bank of Ireland)
on 30 September, 1992 with a request for a certificate under
Section 4(4) of
the
Competition Act, 1991 or, in the event of a refusal by the Competition
Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2) in respect of a
lease between Drakebury Construction Ltd and the Bank of Ireland.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the Notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of unit 126 in the Eyre Square Centre, Galway
City between Drakebury Construction Ltd as landlord and the Bank of Ireland as
tenant.
(b) The
Parties Involved
3. Drakebury
Construction Ltd is the freeholder and original landlord of the Eyre Square
Centre, Galway. The Bank of Ireland is the second largest commercial bank in
the State with a country wide network of 290 branch offices.
(c) The
Notified Arrangements
4. The
notified lease was made on 13 March, 1991 for a term of 999 years. The
restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:
(a) Under
clause 4.11.2 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not without the prior
consent in writing of the Landlord or its Agent thereunto lawfully authorised
to use or to permit or suffer or allow the Demised Premises or any part or
parts thereof to be used for any purpose other than for the Permitted Business
and for no other purpose or purposes whatsoever....
PROVIDED
ALWAYS AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND DECLARED
that upon any application by the Tenant or any authorised under-tenant or the
Tenant for liberty to alter or change the Permitted Business the Landlord shall
not unreasonably withhold its consent to such proposed change of user..."
(b) Under
clause 1 Permitted Business is defined as "in relation to the Demised Premises
generally the business of provision of financial services in general including
(but without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing) banking, building
society, investment, financial dealing and consultancy, money dealing,
provision and use at all times and for all purposes of Automatic Teller
Machines, hire purchase leasing, discounting, dealing in exchange and
securities and any other business normally carried on or ancillary to banking
but in relation to the part of the Demised Premises more particularly described
and delineated on Plan B annexed hereto and thereon coloured yellow only the
provision and use at all times and for all purposes of an automatic teller
machine.
(c) Under
clause 4.25.1 the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not to assign, transfer,
underlet or part with the possession or occupation of the Demised Premises or
any part thereof without first notifying the Landlord and procuring that the
assignee or sub-lessee shall enter into a direct covenant with the Landlord to
perform and observe the covenants and conditions on the Tenant's part contained
in this Lease".
d) Under
clause 5.6 the landlord covenants with the tenant "Not for the period
commencing on the Term Commencement Date and expiring ten years after the date
of issue of the Certificate of Practical Completion under the Development
Agreement, to instal or operate or permit or suffer or allow to be installed or
operated by any person, other than the Tenant, an Automatic Teller Machine in
(or fronting onto) the Malls at Levels One and Two within the Centre or in any
lobby adjacent to the Malls
BUT
EXCLUDING
any Automatic Teller Machine located in a store or lobby not designed
exclusively for the use of an Automatic Teller Machine lobby".
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
5. The
Authority considers that Drakebury Construction Ltd and the Bank of Ireland are
undertakings and that the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings.
The agreement has effect within the state.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September, 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil of 10
September, 1993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreement between Drakebury Construction Ltd and the Bank of Ireland
does not offend against
section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Drakebury Construction Limited and the
Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland in relation to the lease of the
premises at Eyre Square Centre, Galway, notified under
Section 7 on 30
September, 1992 (notification no. CA/339/92E), does not offend against
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
15
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority