British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
H Williams & Co Ltd/ Glenberg [1993] IECA 199 (3rd December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/199.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 199
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
H Williams & Co Ltd/ Glenberg [1993] IECA 199 (3rd December, 1993)
Notification
No. CA/1004/92E- H. Williams and Company Ltd/ Glenberg
Decision
No. 199.
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Glenberg on 30 September 1992 with a request for a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in the event of a refusal by
the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2),
in respect of a Conveyance Agreement between H.Williams and Company Ltd and
Glenberg.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the conveyance agreement relating to the sale of Unit 4,
at Shankill Shopping Centre, Shankill, Co. Dublin between H.Williams and
Company Ltd as vendor and Glenberg as purchaser.
(b) The
parties involved
3. H.
Williams and Company Ltd traded as a supermarket and was engaged in the letting
of units at shopping centres. Glenberg is the property holding company for the
Peter Mark chain of hairdressing saloons. Peter Mark, an unlimited company,
which operates the hairdressing business, is a subsidiary of Glenberg.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified conveyance agreement was executed on 10 September 1984. The vendor
indicated in the agreement was H. Williams and Company Ltd "which expression
shall include and be deemed to include ...its successors and assigns" while the
purchaser indicated was Glenberg Ltd "which expression shall include and be
deemed to include ....his executors, administrators and assigns". The
restrictive user clause in the agreement is as follows:-
(a) Under
clause D (b) of the agreement "The Purchaser hereby covenants with the Vendor
to perform and observe the covenants conditions and stipulations set out in the
Fourth Schedule hereto to the intent that the burden of such of the same
covenants.....shall run with and bind the sold land....."
The
Fourth Schedule includes a covenant by the purchaser "Not to use the sold land
for any purpose other than as a Hairdressing Salon provided always that the
Vendor shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to change of use where no
other portion of the retained property is at that time being used for that use."
(b) Under
clause D (d) "the Vendor hereby covenants with the purchaser to the effect that
the covenants will be a burden on the retained property for the benefit of the
sold land and not to permit any part of the retained property to be used as a
Hairdressing Salon."
The
"retained property" is defined as so much of the estate (i.e. the area of
Shankill Shopping Centre shown on the plan annexed to the agreement) that does
not comprise the sold land.
The
agreement also required the purchaser to comply with other covenants related to
the upkeep of the premises and its environs together with a requirement on the
lessee to contribute towards the common facilities in the Shopping Centre and
its management.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that at the time the agreement was executed H.Williams and
Company Ltd and Glenberg Ltd were undertakings and that the notified agreement
is an agreement between undertakings. The agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
sale agreement contains a permitted user clause whereby the purchaser is
restricted to using the premises for the purpose of a hairdressing salon while
the vendor covenanted not to allow the remaining area of the shopping centre to
be used for a similar purpose. In its Notice on Shopping Centre Leases which
was published in Iris Oifigiuil on 10 September 1993 (pp.665-667) the Authority
expressed its conclusion that such restricted user clauses do not generally
offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act 1991 for the reasons stated
in that notice. The Authority would also take the view that the inclusion of
similar covenants in agreements for the sale or transfer of landlord or lessee
interests in shopping centre leases similarly do not have the object or effect
of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in trade in any goods or
services in the State or in any part of the State, for the reasons given in the
Notice. The Authority therefore considers that the notified agreement between
H. Williams and Company Ltd and Glenberg does not offend against
Section 4 (1)
of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between H. Williams and Company Ltd and
Glenberg in relation to the sale of unit 4, Shankill Shopping Centre, Shankill,
Co. Dublin notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992 (notification no.
CA/1004/92E), does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
3
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority