Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Omni Park Ltd/Tenants at Omni Centre [1993] IECA 189 (3rd December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/189.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 189
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Omni Park Ltd/Tenants at Omni Centre [1993] IECA 189 (3rd December, 1993)
Notification
No: CA/1102/92 - Omni Park Limited/Tenants of Omni Park Centre.
Decision
No: 189.
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Omni Park Limited on 30 September, l992 with a request for a
certificate under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, l99l or, in the event of
a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2) in respect of a standard lease between Omni Park Limited and its
tenants.
The
Facts
(a) Subject
of the notification
2 The
notification concerns the standard lease relating to the units in the Omni Park
Centre, Swords Road, Dublin 9 between Omni Park Ltd. as landlord and the tenants.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Omni
Park Ltd is a limited liability company and it is the owner and landlord of the
Omni Park Centre. The other parties are the tenants who are involved in
various trading or service activities at the centre.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
standard shopping centre lease notified contains the following restricted user
clauses viz.
(I) Under
clause 4 (12) the tenant covenants with the landlord "Not to transfer assign
underlet mortgage charge hold in trust for another part with nor share
possession or control or occupation of the Property or any part thereof
SAVE
AND EXCEPT
as is permitted and subject to full compliance with the requirements set out..."
(II) Under
clause 4(21) the tenant covenants with the landlord
"(a) Not
to use the whole or any part of the Property ................
(v)
for
the sale of food or foodstuffs
(vi)
as
a restaurant
(vii) without prejudice to the generality of sub-paragraph (v) and (vi) as a
fried fish shop or
as a shop for the sale of hot food for consumption off the premises.
(viii) for the sale of any intoxicating liquor ..........
..........
(xii) as a department store
(xiii) as a barber's shop or hairdressing salon or beauty salon
(xv)
as an opticians
(xvii)
without prejudice to the foregoing so as to contravene the Supermarket User
Protection Clause the Department Store User Protection Clause or the Restaurant
User Protection
(xvi) subject to paragraph (b) of this sub-clause otherwise than for the
Permitted Use
(b) Subject
as aforesaid not to use the whole or any part of the Property for any business
other than the Permitted Use without the previous consent in writing of the
Landlord which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld
(c) Without
prejudice to the generality of sub-paragraph (xv) of paragraph (a) of this
sub-clause of this clause to observe the Core Restrictions as defined in the
Supermarket User Protection Clause the Core Restrictions as defined in the
Department Store User Protection Clause and the Core Restrictions as defined in
the Restaurant User Protection Clause."
(c) The
Third Schedule contains the Core Restrictions involving covenants by the
Landlord not to use or permit the use in the centre by any other tenant of an
area exceeding 1,500 sq feet for the sale of foodstuffs, an area exceeding
5,000 sq. feet as a department store and an area exceeding 2,000 sq. feet as a
Restaurant (excluding fast food shops and a coffee shop).
In
addition there are a number of other restrictive covenants and obligations in
the standard lease.
5. Omni
Park have also supplied details of the permitted user under clause 4.21 (b)
applying to each of 16 leases whereby the tenant is restricted to particular
specified retail or service activities. They have also supplied details of the
exclusive user granted by way of side letters for a period (generally from
October 1991) of five years for the 16 units which include a chemist, coffee
shop, butchers, bakers, bookshop, dry cleaners, opticians, camera shop and an
ATM Machine. In addition exclusivity has been granted by covenants in the
leases in respect of a supermarket, department store, restaurant and medical
centre.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
6. The
Authority considers that Omni Park Limited and its tenants are undertakings and
that the notified leases are agreements between undertakings. The agreements
have effect within the State.
7. The
Authority considers that the notified agreements, and their restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September, l993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil of l0
September, l993, pp. 665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the
notified agreements between Omni Park Limited and its tenants does not offend
against section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
The
Certificate
8. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreements between Omni Park Limited and its tenants in
relation to the lease of the premises in the Omni Park Centre, Swords Rd,
Dublin 9 notified under Section 7 on 30 September, l992 (notification No
CA/1102/92), do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
3
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority