British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Royal Liver Trustees Ltd/Anika Enterprises Ltd [1993] IECA 181 (3rd December, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/181.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 181
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Royal Liver Trustees Ltd/Anika Enterprises Ltd [1993] IECA 181 (3rd December, 1993)
Notification
No. CA/549/92E - Royal Liver Trustees Ltd/Anika Enterprises Ltd.
Decision
No. 181.
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by Royal Liver Trustees Ltd on 30 September 1992 with a request for a
certificate under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in the event of
a refusal by the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2), in respect of a lease between Royal Liver Trustees Ltd and Anika
Enterprises Ltd.
The
Facts
(a)
The subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of Unit 7, Royal Liver Assurance Retail Park,
Naas Road, Dublin 12 between Royal Liver Trustees Ltd as Landlord and Anika
Enterprises Ltd as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Royal
Liver Trustees Ltd is the corporate trustee of the Royal Liver Friendly
Society, whose registered office is in Liverpool, and it is involved in the
investment of funds and in the letting of commercial properties. Anika
Enterprises Ltd trading as Atlantic Homecare is involved in the retailing of
DIY Home Improvement products, Furniture and Garden goods.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified shop lease was executed on 15 September 1990 for a term of 35 years
from 1 July 1990. The restricted user clauses in the lease are as follows:-
(i) Under
clause 2 (3) (a) the tenant covenants "not without the prior consent in writing
of the Landlord or its agents...to use or to permit or suffer or allow the
premises or any part or part thereof to be used for any other purpose other
than as set forth in Part II of the First Schedule hereto and for no other
purpose or purposes whatsoever.......
PROVIDED
ALWAYS AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND DECLARED
that upon application.......the Landlord shall not unreasonably withhold its
consent to such proposed change of user but in considering the matter full
account will be taken of....the fact that the premises form part of an estate
in which it is necessary and desirable....that the nature of the businesses
carried on...should be.....as diverse as possible and of the proper balance of
quality and user in a Retail Park.....".
Part
II of the First Schedule reads under the heading Permitted User "A Retail
D.I.Y. Home Improvement and Furniture Centre and
ancillary
thereto a Garden Centre as shown on the map...."
(ii) Under
clause 2(4) the tenant covenants
(a) Not
to assign licence franchise underlet part with or sublet or share possession or
occupation of part only of the premises.
(b) Not
without the prior consent of the Landlord (such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld but which may be subject to reasonable conditions) to assign underlet
or part with or sub-let or share possession or occupation of the whole of the
Premises."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Royal Liver Trustees Ltd and Anika Enterprises Ltd are
undertakings and that the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings.
The agreement has effect within the State.
6. In
its Notice of 2 September 1993 on Shopping Centre Leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993, pp.665-667) the Authority stated its view that such lease
agreements and their restricted and exclusive user clauses and the other
standard restrictive clauses and obligations, do not generally have the object
or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in trade in any
goods or services in the State or in any part of the State, for the reasons
given in the Notice. The Naas Rd retail park is to a degree dissimilar to the
normal shopping centre because of its emphasis on retail warehousing and
because of Planning Act requirements for a retail park which may limit the
diversity of the trading activities that might be carried on. Nevertheless the
Authority would take the view that this reduction in diversity is compensated
for by the concentration of retail activities of a generic kind, i.e. DIY/Home
Improvements/Furnishings , at the retail park which leads to enhanced
competition. The Authority therefore considers that the notified agreement
between Royal Liver Trustees Ltd and Anika Enterprises Ltd does not offend
against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Royal Liver Trustees Ltd and Anika
Enterprises Ltd in relation to the lease of the premises at Unit 7 Royal Liver
Assurance Retail Park, Naas Rd., Dublin 12 notified under
Section 7 on 30
September 1992 (notification no. CA/549/92E), does not offend against
Section 4
(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
3
December 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority