British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Power Supermarkets Ltd/D Horkan Ltd [1993] IECA 102 (13th October, 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1993/102.html
Cite as:
[1993] IECA 102
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Power Supermarkets Ltd/D Horkan Ltd [1993] IECA 102 (13th October, 1993)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 13 October 1993 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
No. CA/818/92E - Power Supermarkets Ltd/D. Horkan Ltd
Decision
No. 102
Price £0.30
£0.70 incl. postage
Notification
No. CA/818/92E - Power Supermarkets Ltd/D. Horkan Ltd
Decision
No. 102
Introduction
1. Notification
was made by D. Horkan Ltd on 30 September 1992 with a request for a certificate
under
Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act 1991 or, in the event of a refusal by
the Competition Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under
Section 4(2),
in respect of a lease between Power Supermarkets Ltd and D.Horkan Ltd.
The
Facts
(a) The
subject of the notification
2. The
notification concerns the lease of Unit 4 at Hartstown Neighbourhood Shopping
Centre, Hartstown, Clonsilla, Co. Dublin between Power Supermarkets Ltd as
Landlord and Hartstown Newsagents Ltd as tenant.
(b) The
parties involved
3. Power
Supermarkets Ltd is engaged in the business of a supermarket and the letting of
units at shopping centres. Its successor in title, Wanze Properties Ltd, is
also engaged in the letting of shop units. D. Horkan Ltd is engaged in the
business of newsagents at several locations in County Dublin.
(c) The
notified arrangements
4. The
notified shopping centre lease was executed on 4 February 1986 for a term of
10,000 years from 1 October 1983. The restricted user clauses in the lease are
as follows:-
(a) Under
clause 4.26.1 the tenant covenants
"Not
without the prior consent in writing of the Landlord ..... to use or to permit
or suffer or allow the Demised Unit or any part or parts thereof to be used for
any purpose other than as set forth in Part II of the First Schedule hereto and
for no other purpose or purposes whatsoever...."
Part
II of the First Schedule reads under the heading "Permitted User"-
"As
a shop to be used as a Newsagency/Confectionery/ Tobacconist and other than for
food retailing (except a small amount of convenience groceries in an area not
exceeding 10% of the net selling area) and other than as an Off Licence
Premises
AND
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND DECLARED
that the Landlord shall be entitled in its absolute discretion to refuse its
consent to any proposed change of user if the alternative user will be the same
as or in competition with any part of the trade or business for the time being
carried on upon any other portions of the Centre whether being carried on by
the Landlord or otherwise......"."
(b) Under
clause 4.25.1 the tenant covenants
"
Not to assign transfer or underlet or part with the possession or occupation of
the Demised unit or any thereof.....
BUT
SO THAT NOTWITHSTANDING
the
foregoing the landlord ....shall not unreasonably withhold its consent......"
(c) Under
clause 4.36 the tenant covenants
"Not
without the prior consent in writing of the Landlord to assign lease or let or
permit to be granted conveyed assigned......any one or more units ....as retail
shopping outlets containing or totalling more than 2000 square feet to any
person...."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The applicability of Section 4 (1)
5. The
Authority considers that Power Supermarkets Ltd and D. Horkan Ltd are
undertakings and that the notified lease is an agreement between undertakings.
The agreement has effect within the State.
6. The
Authority considers that the notified agreement, and its restricted and
exclusive user clauses and the other standard restrictive clauses and
obligations, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any
part of the State, for the reasons given in the Notice of the Authority of 2
September 1993 in respect of shopping centre leases (Iris Oifigiuil 10
September 1993 pp.665-667). The Authority therefore considers that the notified
agreement between Power Supermarkets Ltd and D. Horkan Ltd does not offend
against
Section 4 (1) of the
Competition Act 1991.
The
Certificate
7. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate.
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Power Supermarkets Ltd and D. Horkan
Ltd in relation to the lease of Unit 4 at Hartstown Neighbourhood Shopping
Centre, Hartstown, Clonsilla, Co. Dublin notified under
Section 7 on 30
September 1992 (notification no. CA/818/92E), does not offend against
Section 4
(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
13
October 1993
© 1993 Irish Competition Authority