British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
English and Welsh Courts - Miscellaneous
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
English and Welsh Courts - Miscellaneous >>
Curo Places Ltd v Ingram [2025] EWCC 26 (28 May 2025)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/Misc/2025/CC26.html
Cite as:
[2025] EWCC 26
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
|
|
Neutral Citation Number: [2025] EWCC 26 |
|
|
|
In the County Court at Bath
B e f o r e :
District Judge Byass
____________________
Between:
|
Curo Places Limited
|
(Claimant)
|
|
- and -
|
|
|
Emma Ingram
|
(Defendant)
|
____________________
____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
On 28 May 2025, District Judge Byass sitting in the County Court at Bath as a District Judge of the County Court, sentenced the Defendant EMMA INGRAM in that case, to a fine of £100 plus costs of £313 payable at a sum of £20 per fortnight for contempt of Court on breach of an Injunction Order dated 6 January 2025 (made final on 28 January 2025). The basis of the sentence imposed is that EMMA INGRAM was in breach of the Injunction dated 6 January 2025, by
- On 17 January 2025 attending St Anne's Avenue Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH and attempting to communicate with a resident identified within the injunction;
- On 9 March 2025 attending St Anne's Avenue and attempting to speak to two residents identified within the injunction;
- On 18 March 2025 coming in and out of a flat on St Anne's Avenue, Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH with a baseball bat;
- On 18 March 2025 the Defendant was found to be within a flat at St Anne's Avenue Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH;
- On 25 March 2025 a video was produced to the Claimant by Avon & Somerset Police which showed the Defendant outside a flat on St Anne's Avenue Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH and inside a flat on St Anne's Avenue Keynsham, Bristol BS31 2EH on 7 March 2025.
These breaches were contrary to the terms of the Injunction Order dated 6 January 2025 to which the Defendant EMMA INGRAM was subject.