If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
FAMILY DIVISION
Strand London WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
B E T W E E N:
____________________
PAUL ANDREW HARRIS | ||
and | ||
AGNIESKA MALGORZATA HARRIS |
____________________
MR N ANDERSON (instructed by Paradigm Family Law) appeared on behalf of the Respondent
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
MR JUSTICE COHEN:
'Mr Hollow, on behalf of the husband, sought to argue that the order of 13 November 2015 should be interpreted as being tied to the actual childcare costs. I do not accept this; the figure was put on the basis of assessment of the reasonable requirements of the mother and child'.
That was said in the context of looking at the position globally, as between mother and child, but in my judgment the judge was right to say that the approach that he should adopt was not one that kept her to bare minimum.
Discussion as to costs of the appeal.