If you found BAILII useful today, would you consider making a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES
BUSINESS LIST (ChD)
7 Rolls Buildings Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1NL |
||
B e f o r e :
and
Master Kaye
____________________
Peter Breitenbach and others |
Claimants |
|
- and - |
||
Canaccord Genuity Financial Planning Limited |
Defendant |
____________________
Jamie Smith QC and Shail Patel (instructed by Macfarlanes) for the Defendant
Hearing date: 18th May 2020
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Mr Justice Fancourt and Master Kaye:
MR JUSTICE FANCOURT:
a. First, how different are the material facts in the Claremont claims from the Invicta 43 claims? In other words, how much will a decision on the section 14A issue in the Claremont claims add to a decision that is only persuasive and not binding.b. Second, how different are the individual facts within the Claremont claims; that is to say, how many additional claimants will be needed in order to create a valuable and persuasive decision on the section 14A issue in the Claremont claim.
c. Third, how beneficial is a decision on the section 14A issue in the Claremont claims likely to be; and
d. Fourth, what is the impact in terms of additional cost and time likely to be.