British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions >>
Nursing and Midwifery Council v Armstrong [2018] EWHC 3311 (Admin) (14 November 2018)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2018/3311.html
Cite as:
[2018] EWHC 3311 (Admin)
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
|
|
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 3311 (Admin) |
|
|
CO/4377/2018 |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
|
|
Royal Courts of Justice
|
|
|
14 November 2018 |
B e f o r e :
MR JUSTICE SWIFT
____________________
|
NURSING AND MIDWIFERY COUNCIL |
Applicant |
|
- and - |
|
|
ARMSTRONG |
Respondent |
____________________
MR M BELLIS (instructed by the Nursing and Midwifery Council) appeared on behalf of the Applicant.
THE RESPONDENT did not appear and was not represented.
____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
If this Transcript is to be reported or published, there is a requirement to ensure that no reporting restriction will be breached. This is particularly important in relation to any case involving a sexual offence, where the victim is guaranteed lifetime anonymity (Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992), or where an order has been made in relation to a young person.
This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.
MR JUSTICE SWIFT:
- The first step to be taken now will consideration of the Rule 33 application. If that is successful, that will be the end of the proceedings. If that is not successful, then there will be a merits hearing.
- Again, you are asking for a further 4 months. I cannot help but notice that even though this is a restriction of practise of order rather than a suspension it has been in place over an extended period now. I appreciate there had have some unavoidable delays in terms of the criminal process but it is still 19 months or so since April last year when the criminal proceedings were discontinued
- I also appreciate there have been some difficulties obtaining sufficient medical evidence to deal with the Rule 33 application. But I think minds do need to be focused on cases where restrictions or suspensions have been in place over extended periods of time. It is unsatisfactory that professional disciplinary proceedings remain open over extended periods. I will make the order this time, but I would not expect a further application to be necessary, unless there were genuinely compelling reasons for that application.
CERTIFICATE
Opus 2 International Ltd. Hereby certifies that the above is an accurate and complete record of the judgment or part thereof.
Transcribed by Opus 2 International Ltd. (Incorporating Beverley F. Nunnery & Co.) Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers 5 New Street Square, London EC4A 3BF Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737 admin@opus2.digital
This transcript has been approved by the Judge.
|