British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions >> Karahojevs, R (on the application of) v Prosecutors Generals Office Latvia [2012] EWHC 3561 (Admin) (27 November 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/3561.html
Cite as: [2012] EWHC 3561 (Admin)
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
Strand London WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
| THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF KARAHOJEVS | Claimant | |
| v | ||
| PROSECUTORS GENERALS OFFICE LATVIA | Defendant |
____________________
WordWave International Limited
A Merrill Communications Company
165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7404 1424
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
The Defendant was not represented
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
- MR JUSTICE COLLINS: This is an appeal under section 26 of the Extradition Act against a decision of the District Judge which directed the appellant's removal to Latvia in respect of a European Arrest Warrant. The issue raised before the District Judge, and the only issue raised, was what I may call the Assange point. That is to say, the assertion that the request through the Prosecutor General's Office was not a request by a judicial authority.
- The decision in the Magistrates' Court preceded the final decision of the Supreme Court in Assange and in fact decided in the way that the Supreme Court eventually decided. Since that is the only ground which has been relied on, it is clear that there can be no merit any more in this appeal and it must therefore be dismissed.
- I should say that the information before the court was that the appellant's representatives were going to see him on, I think, Thursday or Friday of last week and would notify the court whether the appeal was to be withdrawn. Whether or not the court has been so notified, it is clear that the appeal cannot, in the circumstances, be allowed. Accordingly, I dismiss it.