Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Allen, R (on the application of) v Coroner for Inner London North [2009] EWCA Civ 738 (25 June 2009)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/738.html
Cite as: [2009] EWCA Civ 738
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
(MR JUSTICE BLAKE)
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
(President of the Queen's Bench Division)
LORD JUSTICE DYSON
and
LORD JUSTICE HOOPER
____________________
| The Queen on the application of ALLEN |
Appellant |
|
| - and - |
||
CORONER FOR INNER LONDON NORTH |
Respondent |
____________________
WordWave International Limited
A Merrill Communications Company
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
THE RESPONDENT DID NOT APPEAR AND WAS NOT REPRESENTED.
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
- For the reasons given in the court's written judgment, which has been provided to the parties and is now available for publication, this appeal is dismissed. There is, however, an error in the judgment as circulated which needs to be corrected. The first paragraph starts off by saying that it is an application for judicial review. That is inaccurate. It was an appeal against a refusal of permission to apply for judicial review. Accordingly the first sentence of the judgment is to be amended so that it reads: "This is an appeal against a refusal of permission to apply for judicial review".
- The parties have proffered a draft order which provides first of all that the appeal is dismissed, second that there is no order for costs, and third that the claimant's costs are assessed in accordance with legal aid regulations. The proffered order also proposes to provide that any application for permission to appeal be made at a future day; however, since this is an application for permission for judicial review, and since it is refused on appeal, there is, as the court understands, no further appeal. Therefore, the fourth paragraph of the draft order is deleted, and in its place, since the parties are not here, will be put "liberty to apply" in respect only of the form of this order.
Sir Anthony May:
Order: Appeal dismissed.