British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >>
SA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 794 (20 June 2008)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/794.html
Cite as:
[2008] EWCA Civ 794
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
|
|
Neutral Citation Number: [2008] EWCA Civ 794 |
|
|
Case No: C5/2007/2927 |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL
[AIT No: AA/02936/2007]
|
|
Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
|
|
20th June 2008 |
B e f o r e :
LORD JUSTICE PILL
LORD JUSTICE HOOPER
and
LORD JUSTICE MOSES
____________________
Between:
|
SA
|
Appellant
|
|
- and -
|
|
|
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
|
Respondent
|
____________________
(DAR Transcript of
WordWave International Limited
A Merrill Communications Company
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
____________________
Mr A Jafar (instructed by Messrs Russell Wise) appeared on behalf of the Appellant.
Ms S Broadfoot (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) appeared on behalf of the Respondent.
____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Lord Justice Hooper:
- The appellant claimed asylum. That application was refused. He appealed on both asylum and human rights grounds. The appeal was rejected. On an application for reconsideration it was held that it was arguable that the immigration judge had made an error of law. However, on reconsideration it was held that there was no error of law and from that decision the appellant appealed to this court with leave. We heard full argument from counsel for the appellant this morning. At the conclusion of that argument we indicated that we did not wish to hear from the respondent, thus showing our tentative view that the appeal had to be dismissed. At that point an application was made by counsel on behalf of the appellant, with the consent of counsel for the respondent, that the appeal be dismissed by consent. We agree to that course and make that order and we order the appellant to pay costs in the sum of £500.
Lord Justice Moses:
- I agree.
Lord Justice Pill:
- I also agree.
Order: Appeal dismissed