England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Rama, R (on the application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 353 (15 March 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/353.html
Cite as: [2004] EWCA Civ 353

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

		Neutral Citation Number: [2004] EWCA Civ 353
		C4/2003/1664(A)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
(MR JUSTICE ELIAS)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London, WC2

15th March 2004

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE BROOKE
VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, CIVIL DIVISION
____________________

	THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF PUJA RAMA	Claimant/Appellant
	-v-
	IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL	Defendant/Respondent
	SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT	Interested Party

____________________

(Computer-Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of
Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

The Appellant did not appear and was not represented
The Respondent did not appear and was not represented
____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT

LORD JUSTICE BROOKE: This is an application for permission to apply for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal which refused permission to appeal from the determination of an adjudicator. It was dismissed because the appellant did not comply with an order of Master Gladwell, but she then applied for her application to be reinstated.

I received this morning a letter from the appellant asking for the matter to be adjourned. The documents that she sent with the papers could not be read and in these circumstances I consider that it would be wrong to adjourn the matter, particularly as she did not attend when she asked for an oral hearing before the High Court judge.

It is another case in which an adjudicator did not accept the appellant's case. There is a risk that she may face trial when she returns to Nepal, but the adjudicator did not believe many of the matters that the appellant told her. In those circumstances, the Immigration Appeal Tribunal were unable to identify any point of law to justify an appeal and the High Court judges in turn could see no point of law to justify judicial review.

So far as the appeal to this court is concerned, the appellant's notice of appeal is in very vague terms. I can see no point of law here to justify an appeal to this court. Both the present case and the case of Gurung, which I have just heard, are in my judgment totally without merit.

I therefore dismiss the application in Rama.

ORDER: Application to reinstate the application for permission to appeal refused.

(Order not part of approved judgment)

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010