British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >>
Ashleigh-Nicholson v Staffordshire Police & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 995 (2 July 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/995.html
Cite as:
[2002] EWCA Civ 995
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
|
|
Neutral Citation Number: [2002] EWCA Civ 995 |
|
|
B2/2001/2680 |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
CIVIL DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT
BIRMINGHAM COUNTY COURT
(Mr Recorder Harbage)
|
|
The Royal Courts of Justice The Strand London Tuesday 2 July 2002 |
|
|
|
B e f o r e :
LORD JUSTICE DYSON
MR JUSTICE WALL
____________________
Between:
|
CHARLES ASHLEIGH-NICHOLSON |
Claimant/Applicant |
|
and: |
|
|
(1) CHIEF CONSTABLE OF STAFFORDSHIRE POLICE |
|
|
(2) CHIEF CONSTABLE OF WEST MIDLANDS POLICE |
Defendants/Respondents |
____________________
The Applicant did not appear and was not represented
The Respondent did not appear and was not represented
____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Tuesday 2 July 2002
- LORD JUSTICE DYSON: Mr Ashleigh-Nicholson, who is a litigant in person, has not appeared this morning. It is now ten past ten. A letter was sent to him on 6 June, at the address notified to the court, informing him that his application would be heard today at or after ten o'clock.
- In these circumstances, it seems to me that his application should be dismissed. When considering the matter on the papers, I refused his application, saying:
"There is no real prospect of overturning the central findings of fact which led the Recorder (who applied the correct legal principles) to dismiss the claim."
- In preparing for this application this morning, I have reviewed the papers, and I remain of the view that I expressed on the papers.
- Accordingly, I would dismiss this application, first because the applicant has not appeared, but secondly because I remain of the view that I expressed on the papers.
- MR JUSTICE WALL: I agree. I have also had the opportunity to read all the papers in the case and, like my Lord, I see no real prospect of Mr Ashleigh-Nicholson overturning the Recorder's central findings of fact. I agree therefore with the course my Lord proposes.
ORDER: Application refused