British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >>
Hewlett-Packard GmbH & Anor v Waters Corporation & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 718 (10 May 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/718.html
Cite as:
[2002] EWCA Civ 718
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
|
|
Neutral Citation Number: [2002] EWCA Civ 718 |
|
|
A3/2001/1133 |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
CHANCERY DIVISION
PATENTS COURT
(Mr Justice Pumfrey)
|
|
Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2 Friday 10th May, 2002 |
|
|
|
B e f o r e :
LORD JUSTICE ALDOUS
LORD JUSTICE TUCKEY
LORD JUSTICE RIX
____________________
|
(1) HEWLETT-PACKARD GmbH |
|
|
(2) AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES DEUTSCHLAND GmbH |
|
|
Claimants/Appellants |
|
|
- v - |
|
|
(1) WATERS CORPORATION |
|
|
(2) WATERS LIMITED |
|
|
Defendants/Respondents |
|
____________________
(Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of
Smith Bernal Reporting Limited, 190 Fleet Street,
London EC4A 2AG
Tel: 020 7421 4040
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
____________________
MR R WYAND QC and MR D ALEXANDER (Instructed by Messrs Bird & Bird, London) appeared on behalf of the Appellants
MR G HOBBS QC and MR T MITCHESON (Instructed by Messrs Shoosmiths) appeared on behalf of the Respondents
____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
- LORD JUSTICE ALDOUS: We do not believe this is a case in which permission to appeal should be granted. Although the principles applied in Wheatley could be of interest to their Lordships' House, we do not see that the issues of infringement raised in this case are an apt vehicle for that purpose. The difference in view with the German court is probably due to the procedure as they have a split trial. In those circumstances, Mr Hobbs' submission as to problem and solution does not apply in Germany, where different courts decide infringement and validity. Their Lordships will have to decide whether this is an appropriate vehicle to look at application of the Protocol.