BAILII
British and Irish Legal Information Institute


Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Davies, R (on the application of) v Parole Board [2001] EWCA Civ 413 (21 March 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/413.html
Cite as: [2001] EWCA Civ 413
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 413
C/200/6240

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
(Mr Justice Maurice Kay)

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2
Wednesday 21 March 2001

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE SIMON BROWN
Vice President of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division
LORD JUSTICE TUCKEY
LORD JUSTICE MANCE
____________________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
THE QUEEN on the application of JAMES DENIS DAVIES
Applicant
AND:
THE PAROLE BOARD
Respondent

____________________

(Computer Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of
Smith Bernal Reporting Limited, 180 Fleet Street,
London EC4A 2AG
Tel: 020 7421 4040
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

The Applicant did not appear and was not represented
The Respondent did not appear and was not represented
____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

    Wednesday 21 March 2001

  1. LORD JUSTICE SIMON BROWN: There is before the court an application by Mr Davies for permission to appeal against the order of Maurice Kay LJ on 4 February 2000 refusing him permission to apply for judicial review of a decision of the parole board of 4 August 1999 that he was not suitable for early release.

  2. The court was notified yesterday that Mr Davies no longer wished to pursue this application and it is unsurprising, therefore, that he does not appear today.

  3. It is unsurprising also that he has chosen not to pursue this matter, given that he has long since been released from his term of imprisonment so that in any event the proposed challenge would be entirely academic.

  4. There is no need to say more. The application is refused.

  5. LORD JUSTICE TUCKEY: I agree.

  6. LORD JUSTICE MANCE: I agree.

    7. ORDER: Application refused

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010