British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >>
Rall v Hume [2001] EWCA Civ 153 (17 January 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/153.html
Cite as:
[2001] EWCA Civ 153
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
|
|
Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 153 |
|
|
NO: B3/2001/0082 |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM BASINGSTOKE COUNTY COURT
(SITTING AT ALDERSHOT AND FAREHAM)
(HHJ ANTHONY THOMPSON QC)
|
|
Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2 17th January 2001 |
|
|
|
B e f o r e :
LORD JUSTICE POTTER
-and-
LORD JUSTICE SEDLEY
____________________
____________________
(Computer Aided Transcript of the Stenograph
Notes of Smith Bernal Reporting Limited
190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG
Telephone No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7404 1424
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
____________________
MR J BATE-WILLIAMS (instructed by Stuchbery Stone, London SW1 2HF) appeared on behalf of the Appellant.
MR P STEWART (instructed by Amery Parkes, Hampshire RG21 7BG) appeared on behalf of the Respondent.
____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Wednesday, 17th January 2001
- LORD JUSTICE POTTER:For reasons which we shall put in writing and deliver later without the necessity for the parties to attend, this appeal will be allowed to the extent of an order that the trial date stand with a direction that copies of the videos be viewed by the claimant and her medical experts prior to trial, with leave to the defendant to cross-examine upon the content of the videos, upon the basis of footage selected by the defendant totalling not more than 20 minutes' running time, such footage not to include any footage of the claimant within her own home and to be identified and communicated to the claimant's solicitors by 1pm on 19th January 2001.
- I should have commenced my judgment by indicating that permission to appeal in this case is granted and the appeal allowed to the extent that I have already mentioned.
- Appellant ordered to pay defendant's costs in the sum of £2793.