British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >>
J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd & Anor v Graham & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 117 (6 February 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/117.html
Cite as:
[2002] 1 WLR 1150,
[2001] 2 EGLR 69,
[2001] Ch 804,
[2001] 2 WLR 1293,
[2001] 7 EGCS 161,
(2001) 82 P & CR DG1,
[2001] NPC 29,
[2001] EWCA Civ 117,
(2001) 82 P & CR 23,
[2001] 18 EG 176,
[2001] HRLR 27
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[Buy ICLR report:
[2002] 1 WLR 1150]
[Buy ICLR report:
[2001] Ch 804]
[
Help]
|
|
Neutral Citation Number: [2001] EWCA Civ 117 |
|
|
A3/2000/0232 CHANF |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
(CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY DIVISION
(Mr Justice Neuberger)
|
|
The Royal Courts of Justice The Strand London WC2A Tuesday 6 February 2001 |
|
|
|
B e f o r e :
LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY
LORD JUSTICE KEENE
SIR MARTIN NOURSE
____________________
Between:
|
J A PYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANR |
|
|
Claimants/Appellants |
|
|
and: |
|
|
CAROLINE GRAHAM & ANR |
|
|
Defendants/Respondents |
|
____________________
MR J GAUNT QC (instructed by Darbys Mallam Lewis) appeared on behalf of the Appellants
MR K LEWISON QC (instructed by Burges Salmon) appeared on behalf of the Respondents
____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Tuesday 6 February 2001
- LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY: Mr Lewison has applied for permission to appeal to the House of Lords. He points out that the House of Lords has not considered the question of adverse possession before, and that this case involves an unprecedentedly large area of land. He refers to a number of elements in the case which, he says, would justify granting permission, in particular the special element of the grazing licence and consideration of proof of the mental element of intention to possess.
- In my judgment, however, this is not a fit case for permission to appeal to be granted by this court. It is a matter for their Lordships' House. The court has applied the law settled in its previous decision of Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran [1990] Ch 623 to the special facts of this case.
- LORD JUSTICE KEENE: I agree.
- SIR MARTIN NOURSE: I agree.
ORDER: Application refused