If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber)
17 March 2005 (1)
(Article 48 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 39 EC) - Freedom of movement for workers - Civil servant undergoing preparatory practical training - Practical training completed in another Member State - Reimbursement of travel expenses limited to the domestic stretch of the journey)
In Case C-109/04,REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany), made by decision of 17 December 2003, received at the Court on 2 March 2004, in the proceedings Karl Robert Kranemannv
Land Nordrhein-Westfalen,THE COURT (First Chamber),
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 27 January 2005,
gives the following
-˜Is a national legal provision under which a trainee lawyer who completes part of his prescribed training at a place of his choosing in another Member State is entitled to reimbursement of travelling expenses only to the amount incurred for the domestic stretch of the journey compatible with [Article 48 of the Treaty]?-™
The scope of Article 48 of the Treaty
Restriction on the free movement of workers
1 - Language of the case: German.