Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> J.G. Evans & Ors v Commission of the European Communities. (Action for annulment) [1999] EUECJ T-148/98 (29 September 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1999/T14898.html
Cite as: [1999] EUECJ T-148/98

[New search] [Help]

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.

61998B0148
Order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber)of 29 September 1999.
J.G. Evans and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
Action for annulment - Lateness - Inadmissibility.
Joined cases T-148/98 and T-162/98.
European Court reports 1999 Page II-02837

1 Procedure - Time-limits for bringing proceedings - Mandatory - Time-barred - Excusable error - Meaning
(ECSC Treaty, Art. 33)
2 Procedure - Requirement as to the facts to be adduced - Facts adduced must be specific and detailed

1 The period prescribed for bringing an action for annulment is mandatory and is not subject to the discretion of the parties or the Court, since it was established in order to ensure that legal positions are clear and certain and to avoid any discrimination or arbitrary treatment in the administration of justice. The notion of excusable error by virtue of which it may be possible to obtain an extension of the mandatory time-limit concerns only exceptional circumstances in which, in particular, the conduct of the institution concerned has been, either alone or to a decisive extent, such as to give rise to a pardonable confusion in the mind of the party concerned.
2 A party may only put forward, in support of its claims, facts which are sufficiently specific and detailed for the Court to regard them, at the very least, as credible and to enable the opposing party to contest them in an effective manner and, if appropriate, to submit evidence in rebuttal. That requirement as to the facts to be adduced, which relates to matters known only to the applicants, ensures that the Court does not come to rule on circumstances which are purely theoretical or are contrived solely for the purposes of the action.

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010