British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >>
Commission v Greece (Agriculture) [1998] EUECJ C-386/97 (15 October 1998)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1998/C38697.html
Cite as:
[1998] EUECJ C-386/97
[
New search]
[
Help]
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
15 October 1998 (1)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 95/23/EC -
Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
In Case C-386/97,
Commission of the European Communities, represented by Maria Condou
Durande, of its Legal Service, acting as Agent, with an address for service in
Luxembourg at the office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, of its Legal Service, Wagner
Centre, Kirchberg,
applicant,
v
Hellenic Republic, represented by Nana Dafniou, Legal Assistant in the Special
European Community Legal Service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ioannis
Chalkias, Legal Adviser in the State Legal Service, and Foteini Dedousi, Agent for
Legal Proceedings in the same Service, acting as Agents, with an address for service
in Luxembourg at the Greek Embassy, 117 Val Sainte-Croix,
defendant,
APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed
period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with
Council Directive 95/23/EC of 22 June 1995 amending Directive 64/433/EEC on
conditions for the production and marketing of fresh meat (OJ 1995 L 243, p. 7),
the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and
that directive,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
composed of: P.J.G. Kapteyn, President of the Chamber, G. Hirsch, G.F. Mancini,
H. Ragnemalm and R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), Judges,
Advocate General: A. La Pergola,
Registrar: R. Grass,
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 18 June 1998,
gives the following
Judgment
- By application lodged at the Court Registry on 12 November 1997, the Commission
of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC
Treaty for a declaration that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the
laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council
Directive 95/23/EC of 22 June 1995 amending Directive 64/433/EEC on conditions
for the production and marketing of fresh meat (OJ 1995 L 243, p. 7, hereinafter
'the Directive'), the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the
EC Treaty and the Directive.
- Under the first subparagraph of Article 2(1) of the Directive, Member States were
to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to
comply with the Directive by 1 July 1995 and forthwith to inform the Commission
thereof.
- Since it had not received any communication relating to the transposition of the
Directive into Greek law, and had no information to show that the Hellenic
Republic had fulfilled that obligation, the Commission gave formal notice to that
State by letter of 27 February 1996, calling on it to submit its observations within
a period of two months.
- In the absence of any reply from the Greek authorities, the Commission, on 17
March 1997, sent a reasoned opinion to the Hellenic Republic, calling on it to take
the measures necessary to comply with its obligations under the Directive within
two months of its notification.
- By letter of 17 April 1997, the Hellenic Government informed the Commission that,
in order to transpose the Directive, it had prepared a draft presidential decree
which had been submitted for signature.
- Having, however, received no communication thereafter regarding the adoption of
measures to transpose the Directive, the Commission brought the present
proceedings.
- The Hellenic Republic does not dispute that the Directive was not transposed
within the prescribed period.
- As the Directive was not transposed within the period prescribed therein, the
Commission's action must be considered well founded.
- Accordingly, it must be held that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period
the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the
Directive, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the
Directive.
Costs
10. Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be
ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party's
pleadings. Since the Commission applied for costs and the Hellenic Republic has
been unsuccessful, the latter must be ordered to pay the costs.
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
hereby:
1. Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws,
regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council
Directive 95/23/EC of 22 June 1995 amending Directive 64/433/EEC on
conditions for the production and marketing of fresh meat, the Hellenic
Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
2. Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.
KapteynHirsch
Mancini
RagnemalmSchintgen
|
Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 15 October 1998.
R. Grass
P.J.G. Kapteyn
Registrar
President of the Sixth Chamber
1: Language of the case: Greek.