British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >>
Commission vs Belgium (European citizenship) [1998] EUECJ C-323/97 (09 July 1998)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1998/C32397.html
Cite as:
[1998] EUECJ C-323/97
[
New search]
[
Help]
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
9 July 1998 (1)
(Right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections)
In Case C-323/97,
Commission of the European Communities, represented by Pieter van Nuffel, of
its Legal Service, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the
office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, also of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre,
Kirchberg,
applicant,
v
Kingdom of Belgium, represented by Jan Devadder, General Adviser in the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, External Trade and Cooperation with Developing
Countries, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the
Belgian Embassy, 4 Rue des Girondins,
defendant,
APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to bring into force within the
prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to
comply with Council Directive 94/80/EC of 19 December 1994 laying down detailed
arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in
municipal elections by citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which
they are not nationals (OJ 1994 L 368, p. 38), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed
to fulfil its obligations under that directive,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
composed of: H. Ragnemalm, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen,
G.F. Mancini, P.J.G. Kapteyn (Rapporteur) and G. Hirsch, Judges,
Advocate General: G. Cosmas,
Registrar: R. Grass,
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 7 May 1998,
gives the following
Judgment
- By application lodged at the Court Registry on 17 September 1997, the Commission
of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC
Treaty for a declaration that, by failing to bring into force within the prescribed
period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with
Council Directive 94/80/EC of 19 December 1994 laying down detailed
arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in
municipal elections by citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which
they are not nationals (OJ 1994 L 368, p. 38, hereinafter 'the directive'), the
Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.
- Under the first paragraph of Article 14 of the directive, Member States were to
bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to
comply therewith before 1 January 1996 and inform the Commission thereof
forthwith.
- Since it had not received any notification concerning the transposition of the
directive into Belgian law and had no other information enabling it to conclude that
the Kingdom of Belgium had complied with that obligation, the Commission gave
that State formal notice by letter of 27 February 1996 to submit its observations
within two months.
- Having received no reply from the Belgian authorities, the Commission, by letter
of 27 November 1996, issued a reasoned opinion in which it found that, by not
adopting the measures necessary to comply with the directive, the Kingdom of
Belgium had failed to fulfil its obligations thereunder, and called upon it to take the
necessary measures within two months.
- By letter of 28 March 1997, the Belgian authorities replied that the Government
was examining the difficulties raised by the transposition of the directive into
national law, which required Article 8 of the Belgian Constitution to be revised
first.
- In view of the fact that, in the meantime, no progress had been made, the
Commission decided to bring this action.
- While not denying that the directive has not been implemented within the
prescribed time-limit, the Kingdom of Belgium explains that the delay is due to the
need to revise Article 8 of the Belgian Constitution, pursuant to the rules of
procedure provided for in Article 195 of the Constitution. The Belgian
Government further states that the process of implementing the directive is at a
very advanced stage. The implementing law should thus be adopted during the
second quarter of 1998 and published in the Moniteur Belge in the fourth quarter
of 1998.
- The Court has consistently held that a Member State may not plead provisions,
practices or circumstances existing in its internal legal system in order to justify a
failure to comply with the obligations and time-limits laid down in a directive (see,
in particular, Case C-107/96 Commission v Spain [1997] ECR I-3193, paragraph 10).
- Since the directive has not been transposed into national law within the prescribed
period, the Commission's action must be considered to be well founded.
- Accordingly, it must be held that, by failing to bring into force within the prescribed
period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with
the directive, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the
first paragraph of Article 14 thereof.
Costs
11. Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be
ordered to pay the costs. Since the Kingdom of Belgium has been unsuccessful, it
must be ordered to pay the costs.
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
hereby:
1. Declares that, by failing to bring into force within the prescribed period the
laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with
Council Directive 94/80/EC of 19 December 1994 laying down detailed
arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and to stand as a
candidate in municipal elections by citizens of the Union residing in a
Member State of which they are not nationals, the Kingdom of Belgium has
failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 14 of that
directive;
2. Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.
RagnemalmSchintgen
Mancini
KapteynHirsch
|
Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 9 July 1998.
R. Grass
H. Ragnemalm
Registrar
President of the Sixth Chamber
1: Language of the case: French.