Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> Charles Lux v Court of Auditors of the European Communities. [1983] EUECJ C-69/83R (20 May 1983)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1983/C6983R.html
Cite as: [1983] EUECJ C-69/83R

[New search] [Help]

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.

61983O0069
Order of the President of the Court of 20 May 1983.
Charles Lux v Court of Auditors of the European Communities.
Case 69/83 R.
European Court reports 1983 Page 01785

APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES - SUSPENSION OF OPERATION - CONDITIONS GOVERNING GRANT
( RULES OF PROCEDURE , ART . 83 ( 2 ))

IN CASE 69/83 R
CHARLES LUX , AN OFFICIAL OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , RESIDING AT 17 RUE BERTHOLET , LUXEMBOURG , REPRESENTED BY EDMOND LEBRUN OF THE BRUSSELS BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE APPLICANT ' S RESIDENCE ,
APPLICANT ,
V
COURT OF AUDITORS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY , JEAN-AIME STOLL , ACTING AS AGENT , ASSISTED BY LUCETTE DEFALQUE OF THE BRUSSELS BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT ITS SEAT , 29 RUE ALDRINGEN ,
DEFENDANT ,

APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM MEASURE SUSPENDING THE OPERATION OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS CHANGING THE ALLOCATION OF POSTS AS BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT ' S SECTOR AND THE STAFF AND OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE SECTOR AND OF A DECISION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS REASSIGNING THE APPLICANT TO THE LATTER SECTOR ,

11 BY VIRTUE OF ARTICLE 83 ( 2 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE IT IS FOR THE APPLICANT TO ESTABLISH , ON THE ONE HAND , THE CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO URGENCY AND , ON THE OTHER HAND , THE FACTUAL AND LEGAL GROUNDS ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE CASE FOR THE INTERIM MEASURES APPLIED FOR .

12 IT IS SUFFICIENT TO STATE IN THIS CASE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS NOT SUBMITTED ANY EVIDENCE TO SHOW THE URGENCY OF THE MEASURE APPLIED FOR AND THERE IS NO NEED TO CONSIDER THE SECOND REQUIREMENT REFERRED TO IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PROVISION .

13 IT WOULD APPEAR , IN FACT , FROM THE INFORMATION RECEIVED AT THIS STAGE , THAT AS THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN REASSIGNED TOGETHER WITH HIS POST AND AS BOTH DECISIONS ADOPTED FOR THAT PURPOSE ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNULMENT , IF HE IS SUCCESSFUL IN THOSE PROCEEDINGS HE WILL AUTOMATICALLY REVERT TO THE POSITION AS IT WAS PRIOR TO THE CONTESTED DECISIONS .

14 THE APPLICATION FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF THE CONTESTED DECISIONS MUST THEREFORE BE DISMISSED .

ON THOSE GROUNDS ,
THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECOND CHAMBER , REPLACING THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 96 ( 1 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ,
HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :
1 . THE APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES IS DISMISSED .

2.THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010