BAILII
British and Irish Legal Information Institute


Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> SA Chanel v Cepeha Handelsmaatschappij NV. [1969] EUECJ R-31/68 (3 June 1969)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1969/R3168.html
Cite as: [1969] EUECJ R-31/68
[New search] [Help]
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.
   

61968O0031(00)
Order of the Court of 3 June 1969.
SA Chanel v Cepeha Handelsmaatschappij NV.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Arrondissementsrechtbank Rotterdam - Netherlands.
Case 31-68.
European Court reports 1970 Page 00403

 
   






++++
IN CASE 31/68
REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY BY THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK, ROTTERDAM, FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THAT COURT BETWEEN
SA CHANEL, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE IN NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE ( FRANCE ),
AND
CEPEHA HANDELSMAATSCHAPPIJ NV, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE IN ROTTERDAM,



ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 85 OF THE EEC TREATY AND THE RULES GOVERNING ITS APPLICATION,



BY JUDGMENT OF 3 DECEMBER 1968 THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK, ROTTERDAM, MADE A REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 85 OF THE TREATY .
THE COURT WAS NOTIFIED BY COMMUNICATION OF 29 JANUARY 1969 FROM THE SAID COURT THAT AN APPEAL HAD BEEN LODGED AGAINST THAT JUDGMENT ON 23 JANUARY 1969 AND THAT " AS A RESULT EXECUTION OF THE JUDGMENT IS DEFERRED ".
IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE COMMUNICATION JUDGMENT MUST BE SUSPENDED .



THE COURT
HEREBY ORDERS :
JUDGMENT IN THE PRESENT CASE IS SUSPENDED PENDING NOTIFICATION TO THE COURT THAT THE APPEAL HAS BEEN DECIDED .

 
  © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved
About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010