Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> Societa Industriale Metallurgica di Napoli (Simet) v High Authority of the ECSC. [1967] EUECJ C-25/65 (26 May 1967)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1967/C2565.html
Cite as: [1967] EUECJ C-25/65

[New search] [Help]

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.

61965O0025
Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 May 1967.
Società Industriale Metallurgica di Napoli (Simet) v High Authority of the ECSC.
Case 25-65.
European Court reports
French edition 1967 Page 00145
Dutch edition 1967 Page 00140
German edition 1967 Page 00150
Italian edition 1967 Page 00130
English special edition 1967 Page 00113

++++
IN CASE 25/65
SOCIETA INDUSTRIALE METALLURGICA DI NAPOLI ( SIMET )
V
HIGH AUTHORITY OF THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY,
HAVING REGARD TO THE JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY THE COURT ON 2 MARCH 1967 IN JOINED CASES 25 AND 26/65 ( SOCIETA INDUSTRIALE METALLURGICA DI NAPOLI, SIMET, AND ACIAIERIE FERRIERE DI ROMA, FERAM, V HIGH AUTHORITY );

WHEREAS BY THE AFORESAID JUDGMENT, THE HIGH AUTHORITY OF THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY WAS ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS OF CASE 25/65;
WHEREAS IN REPLY TO THE STATEMENT OF FEES AND EXPENSES SENT ON 27 MARCH 1967 BY ARTURO COTTRAU, COUNSEL FOR THE SIMET COMPANY, TO THE HIGH AUTHORITY, THE AGENT OF THE LATTER, ITALO TELCHINI, BY LETTER DATED 6 APRIL 1967, INFORMED MR COTTRAU ' THAT IN PURSUANCE OF A PRACTICE HITHERTO ADOPTED IN SIMILAR CASES, THE HIGH AUTHORITY WAITS UNTIL THE COURT HAS PRONOUNCED UPON THE SETTLEMENT OF FEES BEFORE CONSIDERING THE QUESTION OF PAYING THEM ' AND THAT IT WAS THEREFORE APPROPRIATE THAT HE SHOULD MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE COURT IN THIS MATTER, ' IN CONFORMITY WITH ARTICLE 74 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ';
WHEREAS MR COTTRAU, ON 14 APRIL 1967, MADE AN APPLICATION TO THE COURT FOR AN ORDER FROM WHICH NO APPEAL SHALL LIE REGARDING PAYMENT OF THE COSTS WHICH HE STATES HE HAS ADVANCED;
WHEREAS, IN ITS OBSERVATIONS LODGED ON 25 APRIL 1967, THE HIGH AUTHORITY STATED, AS REGARDS THE AMOUNT OF THE COSTS, THAT IT WAS CONTENT TO LEAVE THE MATTER FOR THE DECISION OF THE COURT, BUT THAT IT WAS OPPOSED TO THE LIQUIDATED FEES AND EXPENSES BEING PAID TO MR COTTRAU PERSONALLY;
WHEREAS, UNDER ARTICLE 74(1 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE, THE CHAMBER TO WHICH THE CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED SHALL MAKE AN ORDER CONCERNING THE COSTS TO BE RECOVERED ONLY ' IF THERE IS A DISPUTE ';
WHEREAS, IN THIS CASE, AT THE DATE ON WHICH THE APPLICANT APPLIED TO THE COURT FOR AN ORDER, THERE EXISTED BETWEEN THE PARTIES NO DISPUTE REGARDING EITHER THE AMOUNT OF THE COSTS TO BE RECOVERED OR THEIR PAYMENT;
WHEREAS, THEREFORE, AS THE CONDITIONS LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 74(1 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ARE NOT FULFILLED, THE APPLICATION MUST BE DISMISSED AS INADMISSIBLE;

THE COURT ( SECOND CHAMBER )
COMPOSED OF : R . MONACO, PRESIDENT, CH . L . HAMMES ( RAPPORTEUR ) AND A.M . DONNER, JUDGES,
ADVOCATE-GENERAL : J . GAND
REGISTRAR : A . VAN HOUTTE
HEREBY ORDERS :
THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE APPLICANT IN THE MAIN ACTION FOR AN ORDER CONCERNING THE COSTS TO BE RECOVERED IS DISMISSED .

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010