Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> Societe rhenane d'exploitation et de manutention (Sorema) v High Authority of the ECSC. [1964] EUECJ C-36/64R (17 September 1964)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1964/C3664R.html
Cite as: [1964] EUECJ C-36/64R

[New search] [Help]

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice. This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment.

61964O0036
Order of the President of the Court of 17 September 1964.
Société rhénane d'exploitation et de manutention (Sorema) v High Authority of the ECSC.
Case 36-64 R.
European Court reports
French edition 1965 Page 00451
Dutch edition 1965 Page 00459
German edition 1965 Page 00474
Italian edition 1965 Page 00431
English special edition 1965 Page 00348

++++
IN CASE 36/64 R
SOCIETE RHENANE D' EXPLOITATION ET DE MANUTENTION ' SOREMA ', A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE IN STRASBOURG, 11 RUE FISCHART, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGERS AND BY R . GARON, ADVOCATE OF THE STRASBOURG BAR, 8 RUE DU MARCHE, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CHAMBERS OF CHARLES TURK, ADVOCATE AT THE COURT OF LUXEMBOURG, 6 RUE BRASSEUR,
APPLICANT,
V
HIGH AUTHORITY OF THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY, LUXEMBOURG, REPRESENTED BY ITS AGENTS, MESSRS . MATTHIES AND OLIVIER, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT ITS OFFICES, 2 PLACE DE METZ,
DEFENDANT,

APPLICATION TO SUSPEND THE OPERATION OF DECISION NO 15/64 OF 15 JULY 1964 OF THE HIGH AUTHORITY, CONTESTED IN THE MAIN APPLICATION .

WHEREAS THE APPLICANT HAS ALLEGED THAT THE EXECUTION OF DECISION NO 15/64 OF 15 JULY 1964 WOULD INVOLVE IRREPARABLE DAMAGE FOR IT;
WHEREAS, NONETHELESS, THE CIRCUMSTANCES FOLLOWING UPON THE JUDGMENT IN CASE 67/63 OF 19 MARCH 1964 AND IN PARTICULAR THE ATTITUDE ADOPTED BY OKU DO NOT APPEAR TO JUSTIFY THIS ALLEGATION;
WHEREAS THE APPLICANT HAS NOT PUT FORWARD FACTS OR ARGUMENTS CAPABLE OF INVALIDATING THIS FINDING;
WHEREAS CONSEQUENTLY THE CONDITIONS NECESSARY FOR THE GRANT OF A SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF THE DECISION HAVE NOT BEEN MET;
WHEREAS, THEREFORE, THE APPLICATION FOR SUSPENSION MUST BE DISMISSED;

THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
HEREBY ORDERS :
1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED .
2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010