61963O0060 Order of the President of the Court of 1 July 1963. Acciaierie Ferriere Pietra Oddino v Haute Autorité de la CECA. Case 60-63 R. European Court reports French edition 1965 Page 00037 Dutch edition 1965 Page 00036 German edition 1965 Page 00042 Italian edition 1965 Page 00034 English special edition 1965 Page 00027
++++ IN CASE 60/63 R ACCIAIERIE FERRIERE PIETRA ODDINO, AN UNDERTAKING IN THE PERSONAL NAME OF PIETRA ODDINO, AT VIA DALMAZIA 5, BRESCIA, REPRESENTED AND ASSISTED BY ODOARDO VALSARIATI, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CHAMBERS OF CAMILLE WAGNER, 31 RUE DES ROSES, APPLICANT, V HIGH AUTHORITY OF THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER, DR ITALO TELCHINI, ITS AGENT APPOINTED FOR THAT PURPOSE, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT ITS OFFICES, 2 PLACE DE METZ, DEFENDANT, APPLICATION FOR THE SUSPENSION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEASURES DISPUTED IN THE MAIN APPLICATION . WHEREAS, THE PLEADINGS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS BEING SUFFICIENTLY CLEAR, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO DECIDE UPON THE APPLICATION WITHOUT SUMMONING THE PARTIES TO APPEAR; WHEREAS DECISION NO 7/63, WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THE REQUEST FOR SUSPENSION, IS OF A GENERAL NATURE AND IS NOT CAPABLE OF IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION; WHEREAS THE DEFENDANT DISPUTES THAT THE LETTERS OF 8 APRIL AND 10 MAY 1963 CONSTITUTE DECISIONS CAPABLE OF IMPLEMENTATION; WHEREAS, WHATEVER THE NATURE OF THE LETTERS REFERRED TO, IT APPEARS CLEARLY FROM THE DEFENDANT'S REPLY THAT THE HIGH AUTHORITY HAS NO INTENTION OF PROCEEDING TO RECOVER THE DISPUTED AMOUNTS BY WAY OF AN ENFORCEABLE DECISION; AND WHEREAS CONSEQUENTLY THE CONDITIONS OF URGENCY OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO JUSTIFY AN ORDER FOR SUSPENSION ARE ABSENT; THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES HEREBY ORDERS : 1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED; 2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .
APPLICATION FOR THE SUSPENSION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MEASURES DISPUTED IN THE MAIN APPLICATION . WHEREAS, THE PLEADINGS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS BEING SUFFICIENTLY CLEAR, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO DECIDE UPON THE APPLICATION WITHOUT SUMMONING THE PARTIES TO APPEAR; WHEREAS DECISION NO 7/63, WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THE REQUEST FOR SUSPENSION, IS OF A GENERAL NATURE AND IS NOT CAPABLE OF IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION; WHEREAS THE DEFENDANT DISPUTES THAT THE LETTERS OF 8 APRIL AND 10 MAY 1963 CONSTITUTE DECISIONS CAPABLE OF IMPLEMENTATION; WHEREAS, WHATEVER THE NATURE OF THE LETTERS REFERRED TO, IT APPEARS CLEARLY FROM THE DEFENDANT'S REPLY THAT THE HIGH AUTHORITY HAS NO INTENTION OF PROCEEDING TO RECOVER THE DISPUTED AMOUNTS BY WAY OF AN ENFORCEABLE DECISION; AND WHEREAS CONSEQUENTLY THE CONDITIONS OF URGENCY OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO JUSTIFY AN ORDER FOR SUSPENSION ARE ABSENT; THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES HEREBY ORDERS : 1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED; 2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .
WHEREAS, THE PLEADINGS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS BEING SUFFICIENTLY CLEAR, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO DECIDE UPON THE APPLICATION WITHOUT SUMMONING THE PARTIES TO APPEAR; WHEREAS DECISION NO 7/63, WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THE REQUEST FOR SUSPENSION, IS OF A GENERAL NATURE AND IS NOT CAPABLE OF IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION; WHEREAS THE DEFENDANT DISPUTES THAT THE LETTERS OF 8 APRIL AND 10 MAY 1963 CONSTITUTE DECISIONS CAPABLE OF IMPLEMENTATION; WHEREAS, WHATEVER THE NATURE OF THE LETTERS REFERRED TO, IT APPEARS CLEARLY FROM THE DEFENDANT'S REPLY THAT THE HIGH AUTHORITY HAS NO INTENTION OF PROCEEDING TO RECOVER THE DISPUTED AMOUNTS BY WAY OF AN ENFORCEABLE DECISION; AND WHEREAS CONSEQUENTLY THE CONDITIONS OF URGENCY OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO JUSTIFY AN ORDER FOR SUSPENSION ARE ABSENT; THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES HEREBY ORDERS : 1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED; 2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .
THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES HEREBY ORDERS : 1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED; 2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .