European Court of Human Rights

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKIYE - 49484/17 (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security : Second Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 821 (22 October 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/821.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 821

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE

(Applications nos. 49484/17 and 222 others)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

22 October 2024

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Kaplan and Others v. Türkiye,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

          Pauliine Koskelo, President,
          Lorraine Schembri Orland,
          Frédéric Krenc, judges,

and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to:

the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by the applicants listed in the appended table ("the applicants"), on the various dates indicated therein;

the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 5 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of relevant and sufficient reasons when ordering and extending the pre-trial detention, the length of pre-trial detention, the ineffectiveness of the judicial review of the lawfulness of detention and the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation to the Turkish Government ("the Government"), represented by their then Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;

the parties' observations;

the decision to reject the Government's objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;

Having deliberated in private on 1 October 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the "Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure" (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as "FETÖ/PDY"), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (for further background information see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 3-9 and §§ 106-07, 20 July 2021).

2. On various dates, the applicants were arrested and placed in pre-trial detention, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, § 58, 3 March 2020). The detention orders relied principally on the nature of the alleged offence, the state of the evidence and the potential sentence. It was also noted that investigations into the coup attempt were being conducted across the country, that statements had not yet been taken from all the suspects and that the alleged offence was among the "catalogue" offences listed in Article 100 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) (for the text of Article 100 of the CCP, as relevant, see Baş, cited above, § 61). It appears from the initial detention orders and the documents available in the case files that most of the applicants were identified as users of the ByLock messaging system. Moreover, some of the applicants were suspected of being affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY based on witness statements, or of financing the FETÖ/PDY in view of their use of accounts in Bank Asya – a bank allegedly linked to FETÖ/PDY –, possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications and/or United States one-dollar bills with an "F" serial number (denoting the initial of the forename "Fetullah"), sharing social media posts or participating in protests in favour of FETÖ/PDY, having intensive telephone contact with FETÖ/PDY suspects, their suspension or dismissal from office, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. It further appears from the Government's submissions that the detention orders of some applicants were based on their suspension or removal from their positions as judges or prosecutors by the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors (Hakimler ve Savcılar Yüksek Kurulu – "the HSYK") due to their suspected membership of the FETÖ/PDY. The challenges brought by the applicants against their detention, including by reason of the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion of having committed the offence imputed to them, were dismissed, including by the Constitutional Court.

3. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts. It appears that, in some of the applications, the criminal proceedings are still pending before appeal courts or the Constitutional Court.

THE COURT'S ASSESSMENT

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION

5. The applicants complained that there had been no specific evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion, within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, that they had committed a criminal offence necessitating, in particular, their initial pre-trial detention.

6. The Government urged the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible in respect of the applicants who had not made use of the compensatory remedy under Article 141 of the CCP, or whose compensation claims were still pending. They further asked the Court to declare the applications inadmissible for abuse of the right of application to the extent that the applicants had not informed the Court of the developments in their cases following the lodging of their applications.

7. The Court notes that similar objections have already been dismissed in other cases against Türkiye (see, for instance, Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 118-21, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 57-64, 23 November 2021), and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.

8. The Court notes that, when ordering the applicants' initial pre-trial detention, the magistrate's courts sought to justify their decisions by making a general reference to Article 100 of the CCP and the potential sentence, as well as to "the evidence in the file". However, in doing so, they simply cited the wording of the provision in question, without actually specifying what the evidence in question entailed and why it constituted a reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence in question. The Court refers in this connection to its findings in the judgment of Baş (cited above, §§ 190‑95), according to which the vague and general references to the wording of Article 100 of the CCP and to the evidence in the file cannot be regarded as sufficient to justify the "reasonableness" of the suspicion on which the applicants' detention was supposed to have been based, in the absence either of a specific assessment of the individual items of evidence in the file, or of any information available in the file at the material time that could have justified the suspicion against the applicants, or of any other kinds of verifiable material or facts.

9. The Court further notes that the applicants' initial pre-trial detention orders were mainly based on information indicating their use of the ByLock messaging system, banking activities considered as financing the FETÖ/PDY, subscriptions to certain pro-FETÖ/PDY publications, having in their possessions United States one‑dollar bills with an "F" serial number, sharing social media posts or participating in protests in favour of FETÖ/PDY, having intensive telephone contact with FETÖ/PDY suspects, their suspension or dismissal from office, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. To the extent that the detention orders have taken into account the applicants' alleged use of the ByLock messaging system, the Court notes that it has already found that the use of ByLock alone was not of a nature to constitute "reasonable suspicion" within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to the applicants (see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 151-85, 20 July 2021, and Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 208/18, §§ 102-03 and 106-09, 31 May 2022). The Court also notes that as regards some of the applicants, the Government have referred to the existence of witness statements justifying the measures in question. It observes, however, that there are no statements in the case files referring to concrete and specific facts that may have given rise to a reasonable suspicion against the applicants concerned at the material time. The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable of justifying the suspicions in question, benefited from the presumption of legality and cannot reasonably be regarded as constituting a body of evidence demonstrating the applicants' membership of a terrorist organisation (compare Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 104-05 and the cases cited therein).

10. The Court also observes that, to the extent that some applicants' initial pre-trial detention was based on the decisions taken by the HSYK to suspend or remove them from office, the Court has already found that such decisions were not of a nature to constitute "reasonable suspicion" within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to them (see Baş, cited above, §§ 170-195).

11. Since the Government have not provided any other indications, "facts" or "information" capable of satisfying it that the applicants were "reasonably suspected", at the time of their initial detention, of having committed the alleged offence, the Court finds that the requirements of Article 5 § 1 (c) regarding the "reasonableness" of a suspicion justifying detention have not been satisfied (see Baş, cited above, § 195, and Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 114-16). It finally considers that while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare Baş, cited above, §§ 115-16 and §§ 196‑201). It therefore concludes that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.

III. OTHER COMPLAINTS

12. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).

APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

13. The applicants, except for the applicants in applications nos. 61722/17, 69796/17, 20355/18, 33857/18, 33862/18, 36369/18, 37106/18, 37342/18, 37483/18, 38707/18, 38829/18, 39008/18, 43957/18, 18424/19, 21243/19, 36063/19, 36119/19, 53305/19 and 19533/20 requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non‑pecuniary damage within the time-limit allotted. Most of the applicants in question also claimed pecuniary damage, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.

14. The Government contested the applicants' claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.

15. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑07), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 61722/17, 69796/17, 20355/18, 33857/18, 33862/18, 36369/18, 37106/18, 37342/18, 37483/18, 38707/18, 38829/18, 39008/18, 43957/18, 18424/19, 21243/19, 36063/19, 36119/19, 53305/19 and 19533/20, a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants' initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence, admissible;

3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants' initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence;

4. Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants' remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention;

5. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 61722/17, 69796/17, 20355/18, 33857/18, 33862/18, 36369/18, 37106/18, 37342/18, 37483/18, 38707/18, 38829/18, 39008/18, 43957/18, 18424/19, 21243/19, 36063/19, 36119/19, 53305/19 and 19533/20, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

6. Dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 22 October 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Dorothee von Arnim Pauliine Koskelo
Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of cases:

No.	Application no.	Case name	Lodged on	Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality	Represented by
1.	49484/17	Kaplan v. Türkiye	13/04/2017	Ömer KAPLAN 1991 Ludwigsburg Turkish	Sümeyye KAPLAN
2.	61090/17	Karataş v. Türkiye	05/08/2017	Mehmet KARATAŞ 1978 Kilis Turkish	Zernişan KARATAŞ
3.	61722/17	Şeker v. Türkiye	11/05/2017	Serkan ŞEKER 1980 Adana Turkish	Hasan GÜR
4.	69796/17	Taşdemir v. Türkiye	09/08/2017	Ersin TAŞDEMİR 1988 Istanbul Turkish	Budak YILDIRIM
5.	70617/17	Bozkurt v. Türkiye	05/09/2017	Ünal BOZKURT 1981 Konya Turkish	Hilal ZAMBAKCI
6.	74831/17	İleri v. Türkiye	09/10/2017	Ferda İLERİ 1967 Ankara Turkish	Bedia Kübra İLERİ
7.	84563/17	Kaya v. Türkiye	27/11/2017	Nurullah KAYA 1980 Çorum Turkish	Mehmet ÖNCÜ
8.	82/18	Koçyiğit v. Türkiye	28/11/2017	Atilla KOÇYİĞİT 1980 Ankara Turkish	Hakkı KAYNAR
9.	3458/18	Dur v. Türkiye	04/01/2018	Bahattin DUR 1975 Erzurum Turkish	Sebahattin DUR
10.	6946/18	Özkan v. Türkiye	12/01/2018	İlyas ÖZKAN 1969 Eskişehir Turkish	Hüseyin Mahir ERDOĞMUŞ
11.	10288/18	Ertem v. Türkiye	31/01/2018	Yusuf ERTEM 1988 Ankara Turkish	Burak ÇOLAK
12.	10773/18	Ulukapı v. Türkiye	07/02/2018	Ömer ULUKAPI 1962 Konya Turkish	Mehmet Turgay BİLGE
13.	12045/18	Özgür v. Türkiye	02/03/2018	Güray ÖZGÜR 1985 Bursa Turkish
14.	16810/18	Açlan v. Türkiye	30/03/2018	Yener AÇLAN 1974 Adıyaman Turkish	Gülhis YÖRÜK
15.	17289/18	Arslanbay v. Türkiye	29/03/2018	Davut ARSLANBAY 1986 Samsun Turkish	Hatice ARSLANBAY
16.	17687/18	Evgin v. Türkiye	06/04/2018	Coșkun EVGİN 1980 Antalya Turkish	Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ
17.	18046/18	Harmancı v. Türkiye	13/04/2018	Fatih Mehmet HARMANCI 1957 Ankara Turkish
18.	18692/18	Sekizkardeş v. Türkiye	03/04/2018	Ahmet Metin SEKİZKARDEŞ 1967 Istanbul Turkish	Mehmet ÖNCÜ
19.	20355/18	Doğdu v. Türkiye	17/04/2018	Yusuf DOĞDU 1979 Ankara Turkish	Faruk DEMİRKAPI
20.	21909/18	Karayeğen v. Türkiye	02/05/2018	İbrahim KARAYEĞEN 1965 Istanbul Turkish	Mehmet ÖNCÜ
21.	23493/18	Çevik v. Türkiye	30/04/2018	Metin ÇEVİK 1977 Kütahya Turkish	Nurten ÇEVİK
22.	23568/18	Akkuzey v. Türkiye	25/04/2018	Harun AKKUZEY 1980 Keskin / Kırıkkale Turkish
23.	23758/18	Ballı v. Türkiye	07/05/2018	Bahtiyar BALLI 1954 Istanbul Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
24.	23822/18	Özcan v. Türkiye	03/05/2018	Efrahim ÖZCAN 1971 Istanbul Turkish	Büşra KURT KÜÇÜK
25.	23912/18	Özkökeli v. Türkiye	04/05/2018	Hakan ÖZKÖKELİ 1973 Afyonkarahisar Turkish	Rana Nuran ODABAŞI
26.	23919/18	Özdemir v. Türkiye	04/05/2018	İsmail ÖZDEMİR 1975 Kayseri Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
27.	24612/18	Sazil v. Türkiye	15/05/2018	Selami SAZİL 1972 Osmaniye Turkish	Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU
28.	24900/18	Parlak v. Türkiye	18/05/2018	Celil PARLAK 1971 Konya Turkish	Mustafa DEMİR
29.	24919/18	Bozdağ v. Türkiye	17/05/2018	Ertuğrul BOZDAĞ 1970 Ankara Turkish	İsmail Hakkı BAYAR
30.	25066/18	Bayraktar v. Türkiye	15/05/2018	Eyüp BAYRAKTAR 1971 Kütahya Turkish	Engin SEMİN
31.	25241/18	Tekeci v. Türkiye	15/05/2018	Hüseyin TEKECİ 1989 Tekirdağ Turkish	Dilara YILMAZ
32.	25253/18	Mete v. Türkiye	18/05/2018	Cihan METE 1980 Konya Turkish	Özgün METE
33.	25893/18	Eroğlu v. Türkiye	28/05/2018	Muhammet EROĞLU 1987 Çankaya Turkish	Yasemin Berna ASLANBAY
34.	26402/18	Karlı v. Türkiye	26/05/2018	Veli KARLI 1978 Onikişubat / Kahramanmaraş Turkish	Emre KOZANDAĞI
35.	27732/18	Uçkan v. Türkiye	28/05/2018	Murat UÇKAN 1993 Van Turkish	Elif KANDİLLİ
36.	29785/18	Güzel v. Türkiye	08/06/2018	Ebubekir GÜZEL 1987 Osmaniye Turkish	İhsan MAKAS
37.	32458/18	Dağdeviren v. Türkiye	28/06/2018	Ümit DAĞDEVİREN 1976 Denizli Turkish	Ahmet KOCABAŞ
38.	32460/18	Beydoğan v. Türkiye	22/06/2018	Turgut Ayhan BEYDOĞAN 1962 Voorhees Turkish
39.	32462/18	Dalkes v. Türkiye	21/06/2018	Mehmet DALKES 1986 Sakarya Turkish
40.	32465/18	Peker v. Türkiye	22/06/2018	Muhammed Enes PEKER 1985 Mersin Turkish	Seyyit Hasan PEKER
41.	32617/18	Özdemir v. Türkiye	25/06/2018	Kamil ÖZDEMİR 1977 Çanakkale Turkish	Zühal YÜZÜAK ÖZDEMİR
42.	32874/18	Kafa v. Türkiye	22/06/2018	Yusuf KAFA 1985 Afyonkarahisar Turkish
43.	32910/18	Doğan v. Türkiye	02/07/2018	Selami DOĞAN 1984 Kirıkkale Turkish	Mustafa DOĞAN
44.	32949/18	Kalkan v. Türkiye	04/07/2018	Adil KALKAN 1979 Yozgat Turkish	Havva Züleyha ARSLAN
45.	32965/18	Erken v. Türkiye	26/06/2018	Hasan ERKEN 1979 Kırıkkale Turkish	Şükran ERKEN
46.	32970/18	Hasırcı v. Türkiye	04/07/2018	Cengiz HASIRCI 1986 Eskişehir Turkish	Şahin HASIRCI
47.	33003/18	Persil v. Türkiye	26/06/2018	Yıldıray PERSİL 1975 Ankara Turkish	İsmet ÇELİK
48.	33009/18	Sezer v. Türkiye	02/07/2018	Fatih SEZER 1975 Bursa Turkish
49.	33043/18	Harmankaya v. Türkiye	26/06/2018	Recep HARMANKAYA 1972 Konya Turkish	Nazlı HARMANKAYA DİNÇER
50.	33046/18	Erdoğdu v. Türkiye	26/06/2018	Salih ERDOĞDU 1979 Adana Turkish	Leyla MESUTOĞLU
51.	33156/18	Arslan v. Türkiye	18/06/2018	Yılmaz ARSLAN 1967 Ankara Turkish	Furkan ARSLAN
52.	33330/18	Kablan v. Türkiye	11/07/2018	Ali KABLAN 1978 Denizli Turkish	Ahmet KOCABAŞ
53.	33836/18	Demir v. Türkiye	16/03/2018	Mehmet DEMİR 1987 Adana Turkish	Belma KAYRAN
54.	33856/18	Taç v. Türkiye	03/07/2018	Ahmet TAÇ 1987 Kütahya Turkish	Furkan BURHAN
55.	33857/18	Koçlar v. Türkiye	09/07/2018	Mehmet KOÇLAR 1977 Denizli Turkish	Ahmet KOCABAŞ
56.	33862/18	Akbey v. Türkiye	05/07/2018	Mehmet Ümit AKBEY 1971 Istanbul Turkish
57.	33972/18	Erdemir v. Türkiye	28/06/2018	Nesli Zeynep ERDEMİR 1963 İzmir Turkish	Melda ALBUZ
58.	34180/18	Toygar v. Türkiye	07/07/2018	Alperen TOYGAR 1986 Mersin Turkish	Çiğdem DERDİYOK KUBULAN
59.	34184/18	Demir v. Türkiye	07/07/2018	Ahmet DEMİR 1974 Mersin Turkish	Çiğdem DERDİYOK KUBULAN
60.	34190/18	Cebeci v. Türkiye	03/07/2018	Abdullah CEBECİ 1965 Istanbul Turkish	Yavuz YEŞİLYURT
61.	34413/18	Kaplan v. Türkiye	26/02/2018	Yalçın KAPLAN 1970 Ankara Turkish	Lale KARADAŞ
62.	34565/18	Güngör v. Türkiye	17/07/2018	Akif GÜNGÖR 1978 Ankara Turkish	Tuğba Nur KIYMAZ
63.	34765/18	Gülümser v. Türkiye	16/07/2018	Semih GÜLÜMSER 1987 Bursa Turkish	Çiğdem DERDİYOK KUBULAN
64.	35118/18	Uçar v. Türkiye	10/07/2018	Mehmet Emin UÇAR 1974 Osmaniye Turkish
65.	35188/18	Şimşek v. Türkiye	06/07/2018	Taner ŞİMŞEK 1991 Antalya Turkish	Kamile KILDAN
66.	35191/18	Çatal v. Türkiye	07/07/2018	Ümit ÇATAL 1977 Malatya Turkish	Bülent BANAZILI
67.	35293/18	Aktaş v. Türkiye	16/07/2018	Halil AKTAŞ 1986 Mülheim Turkish	Büşra DİNÇER
68.	35427/18	Yapan v. Türkiye	05/07/2018	Murat YAPAN 1974 Zonguldak Turkish	Ahmet ÖZDİN
69.	35446/18	Taşdemir v. Türkiye	03/07/2018	Hüseyin TAŞDEMİR 1975 Şanlıurfa Turkish	Muhammed Mustafa GÜRSOY
70.	35548/18	Danış v. Türkiye	18/07/2018	Bilal DANIŞ 1990 İzmir Turkish
71.	35621/18	Aydın v. Türkiye	12/07/2018	Yavuz AYDIN 1985 Antalya Turkish	İshak IŞIK
72.	35642/18	Yivli v. Türkiye	20/07/2018	Hayati YİVLİ 1972 Ankara Turkish	Halil ŞAHİN
73.	35661/18	Sarıca v. Türkiye	13/07/2018	Ahmet SARICA 1982 Denizli Turkish	Bilal Eren MASKAN
74.	35671/18	Gürler v. Türkiye	09/07/2018	Mücahit GÜRLER 1980 Odunpazarı / ESKİŞEHİR Turkish	Ömer Yasin KORU
75.	35694/18	Karagülmez v. Türkiye	13/07/2018	Fevzi KARAGÜLMEZ 1976 Ankara Turkish	Hidayet KARAGÜLMEZ
76.	35707/18	Tokar v. Türkiye	11/07/2018	Mustafa TOKAR 1990 Van Turkish	Hatice Kübra EKİCİ
77.	35958/18	Sarı v. Türkiye	23/07/2018	Mustafa SARI 1974 Ankara Turkish	Ömer MANTI
78.	36107/18	Bağcı v. Türkiye	24/07/2018	Süleyman BAĞCI 1977 Konya Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
79.	36169/18	Can v. Türkiye	24/07/2018	Engin CAN 1974 Tekirdağ Turkish	Mehmet Ertürk ERDEVİR
80.	36236/18	Tümer v. Türkiye	16/07/2018	Yusuf TÜMER 1986 Ankara Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
81.	36275/18	Kurt v. Türkiye	16/07/2018	Halil KURT 1987 Kütahya Turkish	Enes ÖZTÜRK
82.	36369/18	Gençer v. Türkiye	17/07/2018	Muhammed Fatih GENÇER 1975 Antalya Turkish	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
83.	36636/18	Demir v. Türkiye	11/07/2018	Nevzat DEMİR 1975 Tokat Turkish	Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU
84.	37106/18	Ayık v. Türkiye	06/07/2018	Kağan Serhan AYIK 1979 Ankara Turkish	Süleyman Serdar BALKANLI
85.	37242/18	Avcu v. Türkiye	18/07/2018	Arif AVCU 1976 Çorum Turkish	Kübra KAZANCI TOSUN
86.	37271/18	Erol v. Türkiye	02/08/2018	Mustafa EROL 1973 Ankara Turkish	Ahmet EROL
87.	37342/18	Üzel v. Türkiye	02/08/2018	Ferhat ÜZEL 1972 Ankara Turkish	Özgür KUMAŞ
88.	37483/18	Yılmaz v. Türkiye	26/07/2018	Suat YILMAZ 1973 Ankara Turkish
89.	37723/18	Kambur v. Türkiye	30/07/2018	Vedat KAMBUR 1968 Manisa Turkish	Hüseyin ÖZÇELİK
90.	37838/18	Ulusu v. Türkiye	03/08/2018	Mustafa ULUSU 1973 Manisa Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
91.	38511/18	Gülver v. Türkiye	06/08/2018	Murat GÜLVER 1972 Yalova Turkish	Burhan DEMİRCİ
92.	38636/18	Şahin v. Türkiye	02/08/2018	Ömer ŞAHİN 1974 Eskişehir Turkish	Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ
93.	38707/18	Akbacak v. Türkiye	06/08/2018	Muhammet AKBACAK 1994 Ankara Turkish	Özgür KUMAŞ
94.	38766/18	Mayda v. Türkiye	03/08/2018	Yusuf MAYDA 1964 Ankara Turkish	Veysel MAYDA
95.	38788/18	Akın v. Türkiye	06/08/2018	Nilgün AKIN 1962 Kayseri Turkish	Nilgün ÖĞÜNÇLÜ
96.	38829/18	Yollu v. Türkiye	30/07/2018	Mustafa YOLLU 1971 Çanakkale Turkish	Gökmen İLHAN
97.	38953/18	Karakaş v. Türkiye	09/08/2018	Niyazi KARAKAŞ 1977 Manisa Turkish	Asım Burak GÜNEŞ
98.	38978/18	Aşık v. Türkiye	03/08/2018	Ökkeş AŞIK 1983 Ankara Turkish
99.	39008/18	Çeken v. Türkiye	09/08/2018	Selim ÇEKEN 1988 Kocaeli Turkish
100.	39038/18	Tunç v. Türkiye	03/08/2018	Selami TUNÇ 1981 Kocaeli Turkish	İsmail ÇELİK
101.	39098/18	Ünal v. Türkiye	11/07/2018	Ömer ÜNAL 1980 Zonguldak Turkish	Nazike ÜNAL
102.	41128/18	Yayla v. Türkiye	09/08/2018	Sadık YAYLA 1984 Uşak Turkish	Nihat KILIÇ
103.	42382/18	Çetintaş v. Türkiye	04/09/2018	Ümit ÇETİNTAŞ 1979 Ankara Turkish	Esra GURLAŞ
104.	43239/18	Tümüklü v. Türkiye	08/09/2018	Tayfun TÜMÜKLÜ 1971 Çorum Turkish	Yakup GÖNEN
105.	43957/18	Akpınar v. Türkiye	05/09/2018	Adem AKPINAR 1992 Eskişehir Turkish
106.	44166/18	Karagöz v. Türkiye	11/09/2018	Tevfik KARAGÖZ 1980 İzmir Turkish	Hanifi BAYRI
107.	45288/18	Şahin v. Türkiye	19/09/2018	Kemal ŞAHİN 1972 Istanbul Turkish	Fatih ŞAHİNLER
108.	45911/18	Şeker v. Türkiye	22/09/2018	Emrah ŞEKER 1983 Tokat Turkish	Arzu Sema YALÇIN
109.	50048/18	Demirtaş v. Türkiye	12/10/2018	Şaban DEMİRTAŞ 1970 Düzce Turkish	Betül KAYA
110.	53396/18	Coşkun v. Türkiye	31/10/2018	Ahmet Atilla COŞKUN 1980 Osmaniye Turkish	Ayşe ARAS KÜÇÜKDEVLET
111.	58245/18	Orhan v. Türkiye	22/11/2018	İlhan ORHAN 1974 Malatya Turkish
112.	2270/19	Erdoğuş v. Türkiye	30/11/2018	Şemun ERDOĞUŞ 1961 İzmir Turkish
113.	2275/19	Uludağ v. Türkiye	19/12/2018	Mehmet ULUDAĞ 1985 Istanbul Turkish	Meryem YAŞAR KARAYAZGAN
114.	2514/19	Salman v. Türkiye	17/12/2018	Halit SALMAN 1973 Afyonkarahisar Turkish	Tevfik KARTAL
115.	4188/19	Soytekin v. Türkiye	11/01/2019	Tanju SOYTEKİN 1977 İzmit Turkish	Ahmet EROL
116.	6739/19	Sertkaya v. Türkiye	24/01/2019	Nureda SERTKAYA 1982 Tekirdağ Turkish
117.	6822/19	Çetin v. Türkiye	17/01/2019	İlhan ÇETİN 1974 Afyonkarahisar Turkish	Ahmet Can DEMİRCİ
118.	6904/19	Özçimen v. Türkiye	16/01/2019	İbrahim ÖZÇİMEN 1960 Düzce Turkish	Nezahat ÖZÇİMEN
119.	7441/19	Söker v. Türkiye	16/01/2019	Ğarip SÖKER 1981 Ankara Turkish	İrem GÜNEŞ (DANACIOĞLU)
120.	12039/19	Alaf v. Türkiye	19/02/2019	Bayram ALAF 1975 Ankara Turkish
121.	12470/19	Bulut v. Türkiye	22/02/2019	Mehmet Ali BULUT 1986 İzmir Turkish	Akif Fikri TOMAN
122.	12701/19	Kuş v. Türkiye	20/02/2019	Sebahattin KUŞ 1970 Ankara Turkish	Adem DEMİREL
123.	12712/19	Keskin v. Türkiye	19/02/2019	Halit KESKİN 1979 Ankara Turkish	Elif Nurbanu OR
124.	13014/19	Ekici v. Türkiye	21/02/2019	İkram EKİCİ Antalya Turkish	Suat Erhan DAYIOĞLU
125.	13224/19	Eken v. Türkiye	26/02/2019	Fatih EKEN 1982 Konya Turkish	Muhammed Talha YILMAZ
126.	14154/19	Mert v. Türkiye	02/03/2019	Ramazan MERT 1986 Afyonkarahisar Turkish	Ahmet ZEYBEKOĞLU
127.	14269/19	Yeni v. Türkiye	01/03/2019	Ünsal YENİ 1982 Aydın Turkish	Zeynep Sedef ÖZDOĞAN
128.	14495/19	Çağlı v. Türkiye	11/03/2019	Bilal ÇAĞLI 1991 Denizli Turkish	İsmail KAPLAN
129.	14500/19	Günay v. Türkiye	25/02/2019	Habip GÜNAY 1983 Düzce Turkish	Sema GÜNAY
130.	14949/19	Biçer v. Türkiye	07/03/2019	Osman BİÇER 1990 Çorum Turkish	Selma BİÇER
131.	15202/19	Akdın v. Türkiye	07/03/2019	Murat AKDIN 1984 Aydın Turkish	Büşra KURT KÜÇÜK
132.	15308/19	Kahraman v. Türkiye	25/02/2019	Ferhat KAHRAMAN 1981 Çankırı Turkish	Enes Burak ÖZDEMİR
133.	16007/19	Çelik v. Türkiye	15/03/2019	Mehmet ÇELİK 1985 Ankara Turkish	Ulviye Özge CAZ ÖZKAYA
134.	16290/19	Dalan v. Türkiye	04/03/2019	Mustafa DALAN 1983 Kastamonu Turkish	Ahmet Aykut YILDIZ
135.	16685/19	Sucu v. Türkiye	21/03/2019	Mehmet Alim SUCU 1990 Mersin Turkish	Tuğba Nur KIYMAZ
136.	16909/19	Günerigök v. Türkiye	08/03/2019	Hamza GÜNERİGÖK 1987 Adana Turkish	Arafat SAV
137.	17210/19	Demirağ v. Türkiye	14/03/2019	Mustafa DEMIRAĞ 1984 Bolu Turkish	Merve Vildan DUMAN
138.	17275/19	Karabudak v. Türkiye	15/03/2019	İlhan KARABUDAK 1972 İzmir Turkish	Kadriye Nur AYTAÇ
139.	18420/19	Demirci v. Türkiye	15/03/2019	Yakup DEMİRCİ 1984 Kars Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
140.	18424/19	Köse v. Türkiye	12/03/2019	Hasan KÖSE 1976 İzmir Turkish
141.	18452/19	Soykan v. Türkiye	29/03/2019	Sinan SOYKAN 1978 Antalya Turkish	İshak IŞIK
142.	18475/19	Özer v. Türkiye	26/03/2019	Mustafa ÖZER 1973 İzmir Turkish	Fatma Nur TARAMIŞ
143.	18628/19	Yavuz v. Türkiye	26/03/2019	Zeynal YAVUZ 1982 Mersin Turkish	Neslihan ÖZATLI SOĞUK
144.	18747/19	Sertçe v. Türkiye	25/03/2019	Selahattin SERTÇE 1973 Istanbul Turkish	Lale KARADAŞ
145.	20131/19	Selvi v. Türkiye	01/04/2019	Abdullah SELVİ 1986 Afyon Turkish	Şirin DEMİR
146.	20295/19	Uzekmek v. Türkiye	11/04/2019	Hüseyin UZEKMEK 1965 Sakarya Turkish	Savaş Barış PEKER
147.	20316/19	Kaya v. Türkiye	06/04/2019	Fatih Mehmet KAYA 1970 Ankara Turkish	Cemile Sabine DOĞAN
148.	21147/19	Şener v. Türkiye	26/02/2019	İsmail ŞENER 1976 Istanbul Turkish	Vahide ŞENER
149.	21166/19	Bağlan v. Türkiye	12/04/2019	Süleyman BAĞLAN 1984 Hatay Turkish	Begüm Merve AÇIKGÖZ
150.	21212/19	Koka v. Türkiye	22/03/2019	İhsan KOKA 1981 Antalya Turkish	Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ
151.	21243/19	Kayhan v. Türkiye	11/04/2019	Akın KAYHAN 1965 Uşak Turkish	Hüseyin TÜRKMEN
152.	21537/19	Uzal v. Türkiye	29/03/2019	Muharrem UZAL 1974 Sinop Turkish
153.	21665/19	Yıldırım v. Türkiye	03/04/2019	Mahmut YILDIRIM 1985 Düzce Turkish	Kübra YILDIRIM
154.	21696/19	Çiçek v. Türkiye	16/04/2019	Bedretin ÇİÇEK 1981 Şanlıurfa Turkish	Melek KOÇYİĞİT
155.	22197/19	Taştan v. Türkiye	16/04/2019	Halil TAŞTAN 1985 Şanlıurfa Turkish	Gülistan TAŞTAN
156.	22341/19	Köse v. Türkiye	19/04/2019	Davut KÖSE 1976 Uşak Turkish	Ayşe KÖSE
157.	22882/19	Yiğit v. Türkiye	17/04/2019	Orhan YİĞİT 1990 Samsun Turkish	Fatih İNCELER
158.	23652/19	Arıöz v. Türkiye	12/04/2019	Mahmut İlker ARIÖZ 1973 Niğde Turkish	Ahmet Oğuz ÖZMEN
159.	24558/19	Şener v. Türkiye	25/04/2019	Bülent ŞENER 1974 Samsun Turkish	Mehmet Fatih İÇER
160.	24961/19	Sözen v. Türkiye	30/04/2019	Yusuf SÖZEN 1979 Turkish	Ekrem KAYA
161.	27557/19	Çıtız v. Türkiye	07/05/2019	Nezih ÇITIZ 1977 Elazığ Turkish	Mehmet Sıddık KARAGÖZ
162.	27781/19	L.T. v. Türkiye	10/05/2019	L.T. 1979 İzmir Turkish	Arzu DEMİRCİ
163.	27956/19	Görüşen v. Türkiye	06/05/2019	Hüseyin GÖRÜŞEN 1968 Gaziantep Turkish	Mehmet Fatih İÇER
164.	27979/19	Eroğlu v. Türkiye	14/05/2019	Murat EROĞLU 1985 Ankara Turkish	İrem GÜNEŞ (DANACIOĞLU)
165.	29371/19	Akyol v. Türkiye	24/04/2019	Yusuf AKYOL 1966 Aydın Turkish	Esra Nur AKYOL
166.	30306/19	Özdemir v. Türkiye	27/05/2019	Galip ÖZDEMİR 1962 İzmir Turkish	Mine ÖZTÜRK
167.	30320/19	Demir v. Türkiye	22/05/2019	Hakan DEMİR 1972 İzmir Turkish	Aslıhan EKER
168.	30361/19	Gürsu v. Türkiye	20/05/2019	Emrah GÜRSU 1988 Elazığ Turkish	Abdullah GÜRSU
169.	33066/19	Terzi v. Türkiye	21/05/2019	Murat TERZİ 1971 Ankara Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
170.	33099/19	Çimentepe v. Türkiye	31/05/2019	Mahir ÇİMENTEPE 1973 Ankara Turkish	Utku Coşkuner SAKARYA
171.	33785/19	Demirci v. Türkiye	16/05/2019	Zeki DEMİRCİ 1955 Keçiören Turkish	Mehmet Emin DEMİRCİ
172.	35017/19	Kömürcü v. Türkiye	02/07/2019	Halim KÖMÜRCÜ 1971 Manisa Turkish	Zeyt Enes KÖMÜRCÜ
173.	35208/19	Ayaz v. Türkiye	14/06/2019	Harun AYAZ 1982 Ankara Turkish	Alperen ORAK
174.	35390/19	Kılıç v. Türkiye	21/06/2019	Bekir KILIÇ 1979 Kahramanmaraş Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
175.	36063/19	Gürçay v. Türkiye	22/06/2019	Özcan GÜRÇAY 1983 Istanbul Turkish	Merve GÜRÇAY
176.	36119/19	Gülmez v. Türkiye	29/05/2019	Ömer GÜLMEZ 1981 Yozgat Turkish	Mustafa GÜLMEZ
177.	36167/19	Cevri v. Türkiye	19/06/2019	Adem CEVRİ 1983 Gaziantep Turkish	Mehmet Sıddık KARAGÖZ
178.	36225/19	Acartürk v. Türkiye	03/07/2019	Ertuğrul ACARTÜRK 1971 Aydın Turkish	Bedirhan ACARTÜRK
179.	36532/19	Genç v. Türkiye	25/06/2019	Abdurrahman GENÇ 1973 Denizli Turkish	Hamdi YAKUT
180.	37003/19	Yavuz v. Türkiye	02/07/2019	Serkan YAVUZ 1974 Antalya Turkish	Zaliha VARLI
181.	38657/19	Kayaaltı v. Türkiye	18/07/2019	Yalçın KAYAALTI 1971 Aydın Turkish
182.	40373/19	Kurak v. Türkiye	18/07/2019	Nurevşan KURAK 1994 Malatya Turkish	Gülsüm EKİNCİ
183.	46761/19	Akdemir v. Türkiye	02/09/2019	Tayfur AKDEMİR 1985 Ankara Turkish	Tuğba Nur KIYMAZ
184.	48665/19	Kenan v. Türkiye	13/09/2019	Hayrettin KENAN 1979 Istanbul Turkish	Burak ÇAĞ
185.	50842/19	Çöpcü v. Türkiye	27/08/2019	Selami ÇÖPCÜ 1974 Samsun Turkish	Ünver ÖZGÜL
186.	52327/19	Yeşilbaş v. Türkiye	03/09/2019	Mehmet YEŞİLBAŞ 1975 Ordu Turkish	Nihat KILIÇ
187.	53305/19	Aygün v. Türkiye	27/09/2019	Hulusi AYGÜN 1974 Tekirdağ Turkish	Veysel MALKOÇ
188.	53731/19	Gezgin v. Türkiye	07/10/2019	Mustafa GEZGİN 1971 Denizli Turkish	Gültekin AKKURT
189.	56692/19	Uşan v. Türkiye	16/10/2019	Osman Asım UŞAN 1987 Aydın Turkish	Kadir ÖZTÜRK
190.	59970/19	Karakurt v. Türkiye	07/11/2019	Bilal KARAKURT 1979 Bursa Turkish	Çiğdem DERDİYOK KUBULAN
191.	61190/19	Toparlak v. Türkiye	08/11/2019	Cemcenker TOPARLAK 1972 Samsun Turkish	Yakup GÖNEN
192.	62700/19	Özer v. Türkiye	29/11/2019	Mehmet ÖZER 1974 Istanbul Turkish	Sumru AKTAŞ
193.	1379/20	Kaan v. Türkiye	17/12/2019	İsmail KAAN 1976 İzmir Turkish	İsa KAYA
194.	2913/20	Pala v. Türkiye	26/12/2019	Zeynep PALA 1979 Malatya Turkish	Merve TURAN TÜRKOĞLU
195.	5593/20	Çelik v. Türkiye	15/01/2020	Safa ÇELİK 1974 Istanbul Turkish	Yakup GÖNEN
196.	7005/20	Cuma v. Türkiye	17/01/2020	Ahmet CUMA 1972 Aydın Turkish	Zeynep Sedef ÖZDOĞAN
197.	7583/20	Çetin v. Türkiye	27/01/2020	Emre ÇETİN 1991 Istanbul Turkish	Ahmet EROL
198.	8206/20	Etgül v. Türkiye	24/01/2020	Sezgin ETGÜL 1984 Diyarbakır Turkish	Özcan BARUT
199.	8725/20	Gülümser v. Türkiye	07/02/2020	Ahmet GÜLÜMSER 1974 Istanbul Turkish	Budak YILDIRIM
200.	11513/20	Çelikkaya v. Türkiye	19/02/2020	Ahmet ÇELİKKAYA 1968 Bolu Turkish	Mebruke Şeyma ÇELİKKAYA
201.	19533/20	Ünal v. Türkiye	11/05/2020	Ali ÜNAL 1977 Trabzon Turkish	Hatice YILMAZ
202.	19966/20	Ekinci v. Türkiye	13/08/2020	Harun EKİNCİ 1977 Ankara Turkish	Özcan BARUT
203.	23623/20	Çakır v. Türkiye	15/05/2020	Feyhan ÇAKIR 1980 İzmir Turkish	Levent KAHYA
204.	24400/20	Döşer v. Türkiye	15/06/2020	Taha Murat DÖŞER 1982 Istanbul Turkish	Cahit ÇİFTÇİ
205.	25204/20	Bülbül v. Türkiye	05/06/2020	Yusuf BÜLBÜL 1981 İzmir Turkish	İsa KAYA
206.	26138/20	Trakyalı v. Türkiye	18/06/2020	Halil TRAKYALI 1983 Manisa Turkish	Levent KAHYA
207.	30992/20	Tatoğlu v. Türkiye	06/07/2020	Yakup TATOĞLU 1969 Düzce Turkish	Melda ALBUZ
208.	34736/20	Mercan v. Türkiye	07/08/2020	Yusuf MERCAN 1983 Yozgat Turkish	Kübra KAZANCI TOSUN
209.	36649/20	Karakoç v. Türkiye	07/08/2020	Mustafa KARAKOÇ 1980 Elazığ Turkish	Özcan AKINCI
210.	43535/20	Aydın v. Türkiye	28/09/2020	Fahrittin AYDIN 1977 Bolu Turkish	Mebruke Şeyma ÇELİKKAYA
211.	43956/20	Dündar v. Türkiye	24/09/2020	Caner DÜNDAR 1976 Ankara Turkish	Hasan TOK
212.	46450/20	Kocagümüş v. Türkiye	09/10/2020	Gülsüm KOCAGÜMÜŞ 1972 İzmir Turkish	Kadriye TÜMEN
213.	50838/20	Bukan v. Türkiye	05/11/2020	Mesut BUKAN 1985 Ankara Turkish	Mehmet ÖNCÜ
214.	51282/20	Güçlü v. Türkiye	15/11/2019	Aykut GÜÇLÜ 1977 Ankara Turkish	Okan GÜNEL
215.	51931/20	Altun v. Türkiye	18/08/2020	Harun ALTUN 1979 Ankara Turkish	Yakup GÖNEN
216.	53937/20	Çaputcu v. Türkiye	13/11/2020	Mehmet ÇAPUTCU 1981 Muğla Turkish	Muhammet Taha SEVİLİ
217.	54367/20	Bilgiç v. Türkiye	30/11/2020	Mustafa BİLGİÇ 1986 Kastamonu Turkish	Hamit Serdar YILMAZ
218.	142/21	Deyer v. Türkiye	02/12/2020	Selim DEYER 1989 Eskişehir Turkish	Okan GÜNEL
219.	2607/21	Sevinç v. Türkiye	22/12/2020	Murat SEVİNÇ 1982 İzmir Turkish	Kadriye TÜMEN
220.	14169/21	Demirhan v. Türkiye	10/03/2021	Nazife DEMİRHAN 1974 İzmir Turkish	Kübra GÜLAÇTI
221.	20454/21	Güler v. Türkiye	06/04/2021	Yakup GÜLER 1984 Ankara Turkish	Numan ZEMHERİ
222.	21688/21	Doğan v. Türkiye	08/04/2021	Betül DOĞAN 1990 Gebze Turkish	Tufan YILMAZ
223.	39388/21	Gül v. Türkiye	16/07/2021	Abdulkadir GÜL 1987 Ankara Turkish	Asiye KÜÇÜKBALCI

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010