Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> KOKSHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 45057/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fifth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 582 (27 June 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/582.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 582
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF KOKSHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 45057/21 and 32 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
27 June 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Kokshin and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
María Elósegui, President,
Kateřina Šimáčková,
Stephane Pisani, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 6 June 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
- JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
- JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
- ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
- OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO).
- REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants' complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning alleged restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
- APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
- Decides to join the applications;
- Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
- Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
- Holds that there has been a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
- Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);
- Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 27 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth
| Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
25/08/2021 | Yuriy Sergeyevich KOKSHIN 1995 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Staryy Oskol
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Belgorod Regional Court 15/03/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
02/09/2021 | Yuliya Igorevna SEMAKHINA 1984 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
10/09/2021 | Alena Romanovna SHUVAYEVA 1998 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kuznetsk
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 12,000 | Penza Regional Court 18/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
10/09/2021 | Aleksandr Vasilyevich KIBANOV 1990 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
10/09/2021 | Pavel Grigoryevich ZAMYSHLYAYEV 1988 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 18/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings) | 4,000 | |
15/09/2021 | Andrey Andreyevich LACHUGIN 1998 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 25/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
15/09/2021 | Sergey Vasilyevich SOLOMONOV 1972 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Komsomolsk-on-Amur
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Khabarovsk Regional Court 23/03/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
15/09/2021 | Olga Borisovna MULERIS 1994 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Kaliningrad
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 20,000 | Kaliningrad Regional Court 23/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings) | 4,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Vyacheslav Leonidovich USTENKO 2000 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 30/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention non 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the domestic proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
14/01/2022 | Vladimir Igorevich PANOV 1997 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 15/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
14/01/2022 | Maksim Georgiyevich GEORGIYEV 2002 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 15/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/01/2022 | Pavel Viktorovich TOMAS 1992 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention 10 days | Moscow City Court 19/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/01/2022 | Danila Dmitriyevich YEROFEYEV 1998 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 20/07/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
18/01/2022 | Irina Vladimirovna SIDOROVA 1975 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Pskov
21/04/2021 | article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 3,000 | Pskov Regional Court 19/07/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
18/01/2022 | Albina Alekseyevna LEONOVA 2002 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Pskov
21/04/2021 | article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 3,000 | Pskov Regional Court 19/07/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
18/01/2022 | Kseniya Aleksandrovna NASLEDNIKOVA 1987 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Shopino
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 5,000 | Belgorod Regional Court 19/07/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
31/01/2022 | Aleksandr Mikhaylovich DERREK 1998 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Yaroslavl
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Yaroslavl Regional Court 15/09/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
31/01/2022 | Anna Andreyevna ZNAMENSKAYA 1992 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Perm
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 7,000 | Perm Regional Court 26/08/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
31/01/2022 | Aleksandr Galizhonovich KHAYROV 1991 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Krasnodar
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Krasnodar Regional Court 04/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
31/01/2022 | Svetlana Yuryevna PENDRIKOVA 1976 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Murom
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 11,000 | Vladimir Regional Court 25/08/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
31/01/2022 | Darya Yevgenyevna UTENKOVA 2002 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Bratsk
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Irkutsk Regional Court 12/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
31/01/2022 | Aleksandr Nikolayevich GRAB 1984 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 03/08/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
10/02/2022 | Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BOGDASHEVSKIY 1991 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 23/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
10/02/2022 | Aleksandra Vadimovna KAMKINA 1999 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Yaroslavl
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Yaroslavl Regional Court 25/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
23/02/2022 | Amir Tagirovich KUTYYEV 1999 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 4,000 | Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St Petersburg 09/09/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
23/02/2022 | Aleksey Alekseyevich DYKIN 1985 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
Lipetsk
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Lipetsk Regional Court 07/10/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
20/03/2022 | Andrey Vladimirovich OSECHKIN 1977 | Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 20,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
20/03/2022 | Nikita Yuryevich YELPANOV 1997 | Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 20,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
20/03/2022 | Mariya Viktorovna SOKOL 2000 | Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 20,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
20/03/2022 | Nikolay Aleksandrovich ZAYTSEV 1991 | Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 20,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity) (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
20/03/2022 | Ilya Aleksandrovich SKVORTSOV 1999 | Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich St Petersburg | Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 20,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/02/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
21/10/2022 | Dmitriy Vladimirovich DANILTSEV 1986 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
24/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 21/06/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
27/10/2022 | Kseniya Aleksandrovna KASHTANKINA 1981 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Ulyanovsk
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 10,000 | Ulyanovsk Regional Court 30/06/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 3 p.m. to 8 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.