Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> ARBUZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 9494/20 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fifth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 570 (27 June 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/570.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 570
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF ARBUZOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 9494/20 and 29 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
27 June 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Arbuzov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
María Elósegui, President,
Kateřina Šimáčková,
Stephane Pisani, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 6 June 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
- JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
- JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
- ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
- OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (COA).
- REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the remainder of the applicants' complaints concerning unfairness of the administrative proceedings and effects of the administrative convictions.
- APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
- Decides to join the applications;
- Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
- Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints raised by the applicants;
- Holds that there has been a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
- Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);
- Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 27 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth
| Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
12/02/2020 | Oleg Vladimirovich ARBUZOV 1986 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | "Dopuskay" manifestation (for fair elections)
Trubnaya Square, Moscow
03/08/2019 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 20 hours' compulsory work | Moscow City Court 16/10/2019 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 03/08/2019 from 2.45 p.m. to 9.50 p.m. - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
26/11/2022 | Irina Aleksandrovna SOFONOVA 1997 | Tyurina Kristina Olegovna Nizhniy Novgorod | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Nizhniy Novgorod
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 27/07/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
29/11/2022 | Maret Magomedovna BOCHAYEVA 1996 | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
28/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 05/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - The applicant's arrest and detention from 8.05 p.m. on 28/02/2022 to 3 a.m. on 01/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings | 4,000 | |
19/11/2022 | Olga Sergeyevna SERKOVA 1982 | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
13/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 19/07/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - The applicant was arrested and detained at the police station on 13/03/2022, from 4.30 p.m. to 9.10 p.m. - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings
| 4,000 | |
27/11/2022 | Irina Igorevna ZAMALEYEVA 2001 | Sabirov Rim Faridovich Kazan | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Kazan
27/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 27/07/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Detention took place between 27/02/2022 and 28/02/2022 (exact time unspecified) - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised in the administrative proceedings | 4,000 | |
21/11/2022 | Artem Vyacheslavovich YEPIFANTSEV 1993 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Nizhniy Novgorod
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 04/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised in the administrative proceedings;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
29/11/2022 | Semen Igorevich DENISOV 1981 | Nemanov Vladimir Sergeyevich Moscow | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
02/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 18,000 | Moscow City Court 29/07/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Arrest and detention from 8 p.m. on 02/03/2022 to 2 a.m. on 03/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
24/11/2022 | Oksana Alekseyevna MINOVA 1977 | Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
24/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 27/07/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 24/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
30/11/2022 | Aleksey Valeryevich SHIRSHOV 1980 | Arshinova Valeriya Aleksandrovna Moscow | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
25/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 03/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest on 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/ assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
10/12/2022 | Aleksey Aleksandrovich KALININ 1995 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
24/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 11/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
24/12/2022 | Vladislav Sergeyevich SHIRINKIN 1995 | Makey Yelena Valentinovna Yekaterinburg | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Yekaterinburg
02/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | community service of 25 hours | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 24/08/2022 |
| 3,500 | |
15/12/2022 | Natalya Nikolayevna KULIKOVA 1972 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Yekaterinburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 15,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 18/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 2.45 p.m. to 9 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings | 4,000 | |
24/12/2022 | Aleksey Mikhaylovich LAPTEV 1984 | Baranova Nataliya Andreyevna Moscow | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Puskinskaya Square, Moscow
25/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 25/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Applicant on 25/02/2022 was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
30/11/2022 | Ilya Olegovich ROZHNOV 1993 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
24/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 17/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest on 24/02/2022 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
30/11/2022 | Ivan AVRAMCHUK 1989 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
01/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 05/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Applicant on 01/03/2022 taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
12/12/2022 | Olga Andreyevna STENNIKOVA 1994 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Novosibirsk
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Novosibirsk Regional Court 08/09/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - from 2.05 p.m. to 11.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised on appeal | 4,000 | |
22/12/2022 | Anna Vladimirovna VYALKINA 1992 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
01/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 25/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
28/11/2022 | Nikolay Yuryevich KHRUST 1982 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
13/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 29/07/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity, raised on appeal | 4,000 | |
05/12/2022 | Anton Yuryevich VAKHRANEV 1992 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
03/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 29/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Detention took place between 6.20 p.m. and 8.30 p.m. on 03/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
09/12/2022 | Aleksey Mikhaylovich SHEMYAKIN 1992 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
24/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 09/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 8.47 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 0.35 a.m. on 25/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
03/12/2022 | Aleksandra Vladimirovna LEZINA 1982 | Zinovyev Konstantin Mikhaylovich Nizhniy Novgorod | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Nizhniy Novgorod
01/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 04/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest on 28/03/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised in the administrative proceedings | 4,000 | |
25/11/2022 | Svetlana Antonovna SOLOVYEVA 1999 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Yekaterinburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 15,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 28/07/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
17/12/2022 | Darya Sergeyevna PROSUNTSOVA 1994 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
02/05/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 17/08/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention on 02/05/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; the complaint was raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
20/12/2022 | Aleksey Valeriyevich KONIN 1965 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Pushkinskaya Square, Moscow
25/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 23/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention at the police station form 7.15 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 2.30 a.m. on 26/02/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints raised in the administrative proceedings | 4,000 | |
07/12/2022 | Anna Sergeyevna MALITSKAYA 1988 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Manezhnaya Square, Moscow
02/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 09/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest on 02/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; raised in the administrative proceedings | 4,000 | |
09/12/2022 | Danil Rashidovich SADYKOV 1998 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Yekaterinburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 10/08/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; the complaint raised in the administrative proceedings | 4,000 | |
08/01/2023 | Tatyana Semenovna DRABKINA 1960 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
02/04/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 09/09/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 02/04/2022, from 2.30 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
13/01/2023 | Alina Nailyevna LATYPOVA 1988 | Sabirov Rim Faridovich Kazan | Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Kazan 23/03/2022 | article 20.3.3 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 30,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 14/09/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
| 3,500 | |
28/12/2022 | Nataliya Aleksandrovna TIKHONOVA 1992 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
02/04/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine of RUB 16,000 | Moscow City Court 01/09/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Detention took place between 3 p.m. and 7.30 p.m. on 02/04/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity; Detention on 22/06/2022 from 9.10 a.m. to 6 p.m. - Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); the complaints were raised in the administrative proceedings,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
12/01/2023 | Oksana Alekseyevna MALININA 1993 |
| Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
13/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | administrative fine RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 13/09/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 2.07 p.m. to 10.50 p.m. on 13/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect's identity, Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO); raised on appeal | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.