Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> KULAGA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 31860/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 413 (14 May 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/415.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 413
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF PETROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 2417/22 and 33 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
14 May 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Petrov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Branko Lubarda, President,
Armen Harutyunyan,
Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 11 April 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and its Protocol.
THE LAW
- JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
- JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
- ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
- OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocol, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocol in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; and Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 64-91, 4 July 2023, concerning unjustified processing of the applicant's personal biometric data by using highly intrusive facial recognition technology in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences, in order to identify, locate and arrest the applicant.
- REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
- APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
- Decides to join the applications;
- Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
- Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
- Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
- Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocol thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
- Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 May 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth | Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
06/12/2021 | Daniil Dmitriyevich PETROV 2000 | Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Cheboksary
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 13/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic, 13/07/2021 | 4,000 | |
06/12/2021 | Yevgeniy Borisovich LUKIYANOV 1994 | Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Cheboksary
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 14/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic, 14/07/2021 | 4,000 | |
06/12/2021 | Tamara Ivanovna ROMANOVA 1954 | Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Cheboksary
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 21/09/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic, 21/09/2021 | 3,500 | |
06/12/2021 | Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOROBKOV 1990 | Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich Novocheboksarsk | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Cheboksary
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic 21/09/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 15/07/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic, 21/09/2021 | 4,000 | |
30/12/2021 | Yelena Olegovna BESPALOVA 1998 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Perm
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court 14/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Perm Regional Court, 14/07/2021 | 4,000 | |
30/12/2021 | Oksana Vladimirovna BYCHENKOVA 1974 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Vladimir
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Vladimir Regional Court 29/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Vladimir Regional Court, 29/07/2021 | 4,000 | |
10/01/2022 | Aleksey Veniaminovich SHILYAYEV 1975 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Arkhangelsk
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 11,000 | Arkhangelsk Regional Court 12/08/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 12/08/2021 | 3,500 | |
10/01/2022 | Lidiya Kirsanovna SOROKINA 1997 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | Fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 21/10/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 21/10/2021 | 4,000 | |
10/01/2022 | Vadim Rustamovich SHAGIYEV 1993 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Ufa
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic 18/10/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 1.30 p.m. to 5.41 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic, 18/10/2021 | 4,000 | |
25/12/2021 | Mikhail Mikhaylovich SEMUSHEV 1996 | Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Sochi
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 19,000 | Krasnodar Regional Court 05/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. to 10.50 p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 05/07/2021 | 4,000 | |
29/12/2021 | Sergey Aleksandrovich SEMENOV 1989 | Solovyev Leonid Alekseyevich Moscow | Rally for fair elections
Moscow
22/09/2021 | article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | detention for 25 days | Moscow City Court 28/09/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2 p.m. on 22/09/2021 to 23/09/2021 until the court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 28/09/2021 | 4,000 | |
29/12/2021 | Timofey Dmitriyevich FILIN 2000 | Solovyev Leonid Alekseyevich Moscow | Rally for fair elections
Moscow
22/09/2021 | article 20.1 § 2 | detention for 14 days | Moscow City Court 28/09/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 12.35 p.m. on 22/09/2021 to 23/09/2021 until the court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 28/09/2021 | 4,000 | |
29/12/2021 | Mariya Dmitriyevna PASTUSHKOVA 1998 | Solovyev Leonid Alekseyevich Moscow | Rally for fair elections
Moscow
22/09/2021 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | Moscow City Court 28/09/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2 p.m. on 22/09/2021 to 23/09/2021 until the court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 28/09/2021 | 5,000 | |
24/12/2021 | Olga Yevgenyevna MOROZOVA 1965 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Saratov
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Saratov Regional Court 06/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 17/05/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Saratov Regional Court, 06/07/2021 | 4,000 | |
14/01/2022 | Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich YLYANOV 1985 | Usanova Olimpiada Valentinovna Nizhniy Novgorod | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 19/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 12.15 p.m. to 10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 19/07/2021 | 4,000 | |
27/01/2022 | Polina Sergeyevna BARINOVA 1993 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 03/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 03/08/2021 | 4,000 | |
27/01/2022 | Roman Andreyevich RYBIN 2001 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 09/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3.13 p.m. to 8.54 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 09/08/2021 | 4,000 | |
19/01/2022 | Rodion Olegovich TROYANOVSKIY 2002 | Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Perm
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court 22/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. on 22/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Perm Regional Court, 22/07/2021 | 4,000 | |
10/02/2022 | Aleksey Vladimirovich AFANASYEV 1978 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 05/10/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/10/2021 | 4,000 | |
10/02/2022 | Dmitriy Sergeyevich MAGANOV 1993 | Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 25/10/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 25/10/2021 | 4,000 | |
10/03/2022 | Vladimir Sergeyevich SEVERENKO 1989 | Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 23/09/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 23/09/2021 | 3,500 | |
15/04/2022 | Yevgeniya Mikhaylovna DEVYATILOVA 1994 | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Belgorod
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Belgorod Regional Court 18/10/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Belgorod Regional Court, 18/10/2021,
Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - Use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and her subsequent conviction (raised on appeal) | 5,000 | |
09/02/2022 | Konstantin Yevgenyevich CHEPROV 1999 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
04/11/2020 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 17/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.07 p.m. to 9 p.m. on 04/11/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 17/08/2021 | 4,000 | |
09/02/2022 | Sergey Vasilyevich SPIRIDONOV 1993 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 11/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 12 p.m. to 9.06 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 11/08/2021 | 4,000 | |
06/08/2021 | Pavel Aleksandrovich OVSYANNIKOV 1998 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 13 days | Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 00.05 a.m. to 5 p.m. on 03/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 08/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
18/04/2022 | Aleksandra Aleksandrovna NIKIFOROVA 1956 | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 15/12/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 15/12/2021,
Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - Use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and her subsequent conviction (raised on appeal)
| 5,000 | |
22/04/2022 | Andrey gennadyevich SELEZNEV 1972 | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Meeting with MPs
Moscow
26/06/2021
Meeting with MPs
Moscow
20/09/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 29/11/2021
Moscow District Court 21/12/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. on 26/06/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings - Final decisions: Moscow City Court, 29/11/2021 and 21/12/2021 | 4,000 | |
14/05/2022 | Aleksandr Sergeyevich AGADZHANYAN 1958 | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Rally in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 15/11/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 9.45 p.m. on 26/04/2021 to 3 p.m. on 27/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 15/11/2021
| 4,000 | |
13/05/2022 | Mikhail Alekseyevich YEFREMOV 2003 | Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul | Event in support of political prisoners and against the Federal Penal Authority abusive practices
Perm
07/11/2021 | article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | 40 hours of community work | Perm Regional Court 21/12/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. on 07/11/2021 to 7.55 p.m. on 08/11/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Perm Regional Court, 21/12/2021 | 4,000 | |
13/05/2022 | Anastasiya Valeryevna MARINTSEVA 2000 | Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul | Political protest
Perm
31/07/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court 30/11/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Perm Regional Court, 30/11/2021 | 3,500 | |
20/05/2022 | Aleksandr Vasilyevich OSIPOV 1980 | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war protest
Moscow
27/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | detention for 15 days | Moscow City Court 05/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4.35 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 3 p.m. on 01/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/03/2022,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
17/08/2022 | Albina Khalilevna MIRGASIMOVA 1992 | Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war protest
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 8.25 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 12 p.m. on 28/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 19/04/2022 | 4,000 | |
16/09/2022 | Yelena Olegovna ZYRYANOVA 1988 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Anti-war protest
Krasnoyarsk
06/03/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 18/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 18/05/2022 | 4,000 | |
17/09/2022 | Anton Sergeyevich NAZAROV 1997 | Lapuzin Aleksey Sergeyevich Samara | Anti-war protest
Samara
27/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Samara Regional Court 19/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. to 8.50 p.m. on 27/02/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Samara Regional Court, 19/05/2022 | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.