Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> CHIRKUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 1097/18 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 257 (28 March 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/257.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 257
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF CHIRKUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 1097/18 and 34 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
28 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Chirkunov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Branko Lubarda, President,
Armen Harutyunyan,
Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 7 March 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some of the applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
- JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
- JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
- ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having taken into account the issue of compliance with the six-month time-limit under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Saakashvili v. Georgia (dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022, in which the Court addressed the COVID-related extension of the period in question), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
- OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; and Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 62-65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence.
- REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in the above paragraphs, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
- APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
- Decides to join the applications;
- Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
- Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;
- Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
- Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
- Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth
| Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal charges | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
13/12/2017 | Ivan Igorevich CHIRKUNOV 1996 | Ratnikova Svetlana Sergeyevna St Petersburg | Anti-corruption rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO and article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 32 hours of community service and detention for 14 days | St Peterburg City Court 04/07/2017 (two decisions on the same day) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 12/06/2017 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO) | 5,000 | |
28/12/2017 | Tengiz Petrovich ADAMIYA 1986 |
| Anti-corruption rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO and article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 and fine of RUB 500 | St Petersburg City Court 04/07/2017 (two decisions on the same day) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty- escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report overnight between 12/06/2017 and 13/06/2017;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO) | 4,000 | |
10/12/2017 | Revolt Revoltovich PIMENOV 1964 | Kulakova Yevgeniya Yuryevna St Petersburg | Anti-corruption rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO and article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | detention for 5 days and fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 22/06/2017 (two decisions on the same day) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report for more than 24 hours between 12/06/2017 and 13/06/2017;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO) | 5,000 | |
24/11/2018 | Arkadiy Sergeyevich RUKHLIN 1989 | Olenichev Maksim Vladimirovich St Petersburg | Manifestation against the President's elections
St Petersburg
05/05/2018 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO and article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 and detention for 7 days | St Peterburg City Court 24/05/2018 (two decisions on the same day) | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report for more than 24 hours between 05/05/2018 and 06/05/2018
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO) | 5,000 | |
20/10/2020 | Firaya Khatypovna KASIMOVA 1968 |
| Rally for the protection of the environment
Osinovskoye
16/12/2019 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO and article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 and fine of RUB 500 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 29/01/2020 (two decisions on the same day) | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of the proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant's prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO);
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 16/12/2019 | 4,000 | |
07/08/2021 | Shamil Akhmetovich MUSTAFIN 1964 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | Moscow City Court 08/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 2 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
02/09/2021 | Tatyana Viktorovna KARPOVA 2000 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 04/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.25 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 5 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
07/09/2021 | Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SERGIYENKO 1986 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Rostov-on-Don
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 7 days | Rostov Regional Court 16/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 5,000 | |
16/09/2021 | Maksim Dmitriyevich ZEMTSOV 1996 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
10/09/2021 | Vladimir Vyacheslavovich KAPUSTINSKIY 1988 | Martynova Tatyana Georgiyevna Pskov | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Pskov Regional Court 22/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
16/09/2021 | Semen Andreyevich POPOV 1996 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Komi Supreme Court 17/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty- escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.40 p.m. until 9 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
10/09/2021 | Arseniy Denisovich TIMASHOV 1998 | Martynova Tatyana Georgiyevna Pskov | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Pskov Regional Court 29/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
10/09/2021 | Yekaterina Nikolayevna NOVIKOVA 1984 | Martynova Tatyana Georgiyevna Pskov | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Pskov Regional Court 22/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
09/09/2021 | Yevgeniy Yevgenyevich MALINOVSKIY 1998 | Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 10/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
12/09/2021 | Dmitriy Mikhaylovich FABRIKOV 1964 | Vasilyev Aleksey Alekseyevich Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 12/03/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 3,500 | |
09/09/2021 | Sergey Alekseyevich BAZHENOV 1996 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | detention for 7 days | Voronezh Regional Court 10/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.15 a.m. until 3.35 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 5,000 | |
09/09/2021 | Ivan Aleksandrovich GOLOSOV 1991 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 12/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. until 11 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Mikhail Vladimirovich AFANASYEV 1996 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 7 days | Moscow City Court 26/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.21 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 7.40 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
29/09/2021 | Nazim Sayanovich ZIGAYEV 1992 | Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich Gatchina | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 30/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 5,000 | |
30/09/2021 | Dmitriy Aleksandrovich GRIGORYEV 1982 | Valenkov Andrey Olegovich Nizhniy Novgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 01/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.52 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Sergey Gennadyevich SHMELEV 1986 | Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Sochi
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | Krasnodar Regional Court 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 4 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Dmitriy Eduardovich GRISHIN 1993 | Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.40 p.m. until 6 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Ivan Alekseyevich YUDIN 2001 | Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1 p.m. until 9 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Mikhail Alekseyevich BELYAYEV 2001 | Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.50 p.m. until 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Aleksandra Ivanovna MOISEYEVA 2001 | Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
29/09/2021 | Konstantin Vasilyevich TIMCHENKO 1991 | Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich Gatchina | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 30/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. to 7.52 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 5,000 | |
20/09/2021 | Yegor Igorevich TALANOV 1998 | Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich Yekaterinburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Tagil
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
04/10/2021 | Mikhail Andreyevich LISENKOV 1999 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Pskov Regional Court 05/04/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report | 4,000 | |
20/10/2021 | Artur Rafaelovich KHANOV 1999 | Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
| article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 26/05/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
20/10/2021 | Vadim Igorevich KHRUSHCHEV 2000 | Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 26/05/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
20/10/2021 | Islam Eldarovich SHAIPOV 1994 | Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 26/05/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
20/10/2021 | Veronika Timurovna MUSTAFINA 2000 | Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 09/06/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
14/11/2021 | Tatevik Vladimirovna GISHIYAN 1994 | Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 17/05/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report | 4,000 | |
18/11/2021 | Dmitriy Igorevich SOLOKHIN 1977 | Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/11/2021 | Kseniya Alekseyevna PRIVALOVA 1999 | Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.